Search Results

1. KD v LT [2023] NZDT 317 (9 August 2023) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...work, rather than proceeding to have repairs done without first contacting him. He said that some weeks had passed between the date he sold the unit and when he had first learned of KD’s concerns, and he had offered a refund as soon as he had been informed of the problems with the unit. The issue [6] I must decide whether the fridge-freezer was accurately described by LT as “good working” and, if it was not, what reasonable compensation LT must pay. The law CI0301_CIV_DCD...

2. SB v UC Ltd [2023] NZDT 454 (31 August 2023) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...date of the order. I consider that interest should be paid from 9 June 2022, which comes to $818.63. The total sum payable is therefore $18,797.27. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 31 August 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

3. A Nair v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 32 (19 March 2014 ) [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...residence visa. [2] The adviser was acting for him; she did not lodge the application until his current visa had expired. The result was Immigration New Zealand could not consider his application. [3] The complainant says he provided all the information requested. In addition, a staff member in the adviser’s practice told him the adviser had a relationship with Immigration New Zealand that guaranteed his application would be successful. [4] The adviser says the complainant failed to...

4. [2018] NZSSAA 54 (19 October 2018) [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...income, which may be far more than he claims. The quantum of misstatement could not be established on the evidence available to us; the necessary information has been in the appellant’s control, and he refused to provide the information when requested. We would conclude that the appellant was probably not entitled to any support, as he would have provided the information when requested if it supported his claim. A final opportunity [17] The evidence points to potential dishone...

5. [2023] NZIACDT 9 - WS v Lawlor (23 March 2023) [pdf, 318 KB]

   ...for that. They just needed to add the assessment. The complainant then asked on 17 January whether there was any update from NZQA. He replied on 17 January to say, “Not yet”, noting a response time of three days. He said he had made three requests. [29] The complainant asked Mr Lawlor again on 20 January 2020 about an update from NZQA. He said he would let her know in the morning. She asked again on 21 January. He said he was waiting for a call back. She repeated the r...

6. [2017] EmpC 41 Cronin-Lampe and anor v BOT of Melville High School [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...This is a de novo challenge by Mr and Mrs Cronin- Lampe to a determination of the Authority dated 12 June 2013. 1 That determination dealt with the personal grievances that Mr and Mrs Cronin-Lampe commenced against the BoT and which they had formally raised on 26 January 2012. The grievances were not settled at mediation. The determination followed a four-day investigation meeting conducted by the Authority. The claims were dismissed in

7. [2018] NZEmpC 8 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) v LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 8 [23 February 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 8 ARC 98/13 ARC 22/14 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED First Defendant

8. Bisschoff v Yerman [2015] NZIACDT 101 (11 December 2015) [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...wished to migrate to New Zealand and approached her. They say: [1.1] Ms Yerman agreed to provide immigration services for a fee, payable before they left South Africa for New Zealand. [1.2] Ms Yerman assessed their eligibility to migrate from a form they completed. They then met with Mr Yerman, Ms Yerman’s husband; he is not a licensed immigration adviser. He advised the Bisschoffs that Mr Bisschoff’s occupation was not on the list of qualifications that allow migration to New Zeal...

9. Far North District Council v Maihi – Maungakawakawa 5G (2013) 52 Taitokerau MB 138 (52 TTK 138) [pdf, 132 KB]

   ...Act 1967. However, the status of the land was returned to Māori freehold land by order of the Court on 18 August 2010, which was registered against the title on 2 August 2011. [3] The Council made a previous attempt to pursue Mr Maihi for the claimed unpaid rates. On 1 September 2011 the Council filed proceedings in the District Court at Kaikohe seeking judgment and a charging order. The Council was unaware at the time that the land was by then Māori freehold land and pursued the...

10. XT Ltd v N [2017] NZDT 1458 (6 March 2017) [pdf, 181 KB]

    ...entitled to recover the actual cost of the repairs, as proved by the invoices provided and approved by the B assessor. The sum payable is therefore $4,923.07. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 6 March 2017 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to...