Search Results

1. MD & IL v F Ltd [2023] NZDT 201 (2 May 2023) [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...the hassle-factor, I consider that is already included in the setting of a percentage amount for damages, so the final amount F Ltd is liable to pay is $1700.00. Referee Perfect Date: 2 May 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

2. MD & IL v F Ltd [2023] NZDT 201 (2 May 2023) [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...the hassle-factor, I consider that is already included in the setting of a percentage amount for damages, so the final amount F Ltd is liable to pay is $1700.00. Referee Perfect Date: 2 May 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

3. KV v FT [2023] NZDT 481 (23 August 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...accepted that these costs were reasonable. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary I find that the costs of the repair are reasonable. FT owes KV $2000.00. Referee: K O’Shea Date: 23 August 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...

4. KI v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 520 (30 July 2024) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...recovery costs being $710.94. The Tribunal has limited discretion in awarding costs. In the present case, I do not consider it appropriate to award such costs. Referee: A Chand Date: 30th July 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...

5. WU v QD [2021] NZDT 1613 (27 July 2021) [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...seeks damages of $14,500.00. [2] The issues to be determined are: a. Was this an “as is” sale. How was this term agreed? Can there be an “as is” sale where representations are made about the goods being sold? b. Was there incorrect information provided to WU prior to his purchasing the caravan? Do the objective meanings of the alleged misrepresentations reasonably convey incorrect information? c. Can there be misrepresentations about matters which QD would not have be...

6. KK v HL [2023] NZDT 290 (20 July 2023) [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...and her friends prior to the sale. He said he was not trying to conceal anything about the car. 33. I am satisfied that the people helping KK looked at the I Ltd report and should have been aware of the issues referred to in that report. That information was made available to KK at the time of test drive and sale and HL was not asked any question specifically about that report. 34. KK said her uncle asked specifically about the brakes and if there were any oil leaks. She said HL...

7. FC v QK [2024] NZDT 415 (14 May 2024) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...for them to be collected by 31 July 2024, particularly as he has a brother in [Town 1]. FC is to make the goods available for QK or his agent to collect. Referee: JF Tunnicliffe Date: 14 May 2024 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

8. Wernham v Accident Compensation Corporation (Work Related Gradual Process Injury) [2023] NZACC 022 [pdf, 315 KB]

   ...recommended that an Occupational Physician obtain further exposure details, for example, the frequency of potential exposure to solvent such as toluene, the nature of the exposure, how these substances were handled, removed and stored, and who performed these activities. 9 [22] On 19 September 2021, Dr Walls provided a further report, after undertaking more research and discussing Mr Wernham’s case with colleagues. These included, in particular, Professor Andrea ‘t Mannetj...

9. AEL Ltd v ZVL [2012] NZDT 310 (17 April 2012) [pdf, 43 KB]

   ...Referee: Referee Reuvecamp ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Respondent, ZVL, pay the amount of $312.57 to the Applicant, AEL Ltd, on or before 27 April 2012. Facts [1] The Applicant claims $506.93 in respect of plumbing services rendered to the Respondent at its request and invoiced under invoice #60437 (including administration and interest charges at $158.06). The Respondent takes the view that its insurer should...

10. [2020] NZEmpC 175 O’Boyle v McCue [pdf, 612 KB]

    ...exchanges in writing Ms McCue and Ms O’Boyle met which resulted in a stormy discussion following which Ms McCue left her place of work. Then followed a succession of emails and letters. Ms McCue remained absent from work. Ms O’Boyle issued a formal warning to Ms McCue, asserting she was taking unauthorised leave. Soon after, Ms McCue’s lawyers wrote to Ms O’Boyle providing a medical certificate which said Ms McCue was experiencing work-related stress, but that she should...