Search Results

1. TQ v UM & Ors [2023] NZDT 369 (2 August 2023) [pdf, 116 KB]

   ...done by N Ltd. He said he had been advised that as he did not have a contract with N Ltd, he could only bring a claim against UM. He asked the Tribunal to add N Ltd as a respondent, as well as CM and HT. 5. Those parties were added at TQ’s request. In addition, HT considered that he had a claim against N Ltd for work done on the jetski. He filed a separate claim, which was heard at the same time as this claim. 6. The issues I have to consider are: Page 2 of 5 a....

2. WT Te Manutukutuku Issue 70 [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...Judge Isaac, the presiding officers, and members of the Tribunal to ensure the work of our unit meets their requirements. Finally, I would also like to acknowledge and thank my colleague Julie Tangaere who, over the past three years, has per­ formed the role of Acting Director for the Unit while also working as Director of the Māori Land Court. Thank you Julie for your leadership of the unit over this time. Kia ora rā. Grace Smit Director  This issue of Te Manu tukutuku...

3. Bennett v Proprietors of the Waipiro A22B3 Incorporation (2014) 39 Tairawhiti MB 257 (39 TRW 257) [pdf, 257 KB]

   ...was received on 13 November 2013. The matter was adjourned to chambers for a reserved decision. Evidence for the Applicant [9] In support of the application, an affidavit dated 20 May 2013 was filed for Deanna Bennett detailing the matters that form the grounds for filing the application. Subsequently a more detailed affidavit dated 27 August 2013 was filed. [10] In that affidavit Mrs Bennett acknowledged that she resigned as Chairperson at the AGM held on 17 March 2012, but she...

4. UH v KT [2017] NZDT 1500 (12 April 2017) [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...more easily done from [Redacted], the builders are authorised to go onto that property during working hours, for the purpose of doing the work set out in the order. Referee: K Rendall Date: 12 April 2017 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to app...

5. ER Ors v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 580 (15 November 2023) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...2]. This leg of the journey was with [Airline 2] . The family was rebooked on another flight later that day and landed in [City 2] on 11 December 2022. 6. ER explained that in January, they became concerned that they had not received any information from the airline about check-in and when they contacted the airline they were told that their tickets had been cancelled. The family had been marked as “no shows” after they missed their original connection in [Country 2] in Decem...

6. BF v SF [2025] NZDT 177 (21 May 2025) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...him. 13. In any event, there is insufficient evidence for me to conclude that the vehicle had been in a collision. BF relied on repair paperwork in the dashboard of the vehicle that said the original front subframe was badly cracked due to some form of heavy impact. FS said the car had never been in a collision, apart from a minor bumper collision at the supermarket, but thought that because the car was low slung, this damage might have occurred when driving it on rough roads in [Coun...

7. Form-35_Family-Invoice_Relationship-Property.pdf [pdf, 225 KB]

   Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 35 Tax Invoice Family Legal Aid Fixed Fees Relationship Property Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from to Interim invoice Final invoice P...

8. Form-38_ACC.pdf [pdf, 223 KB]

   Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 38 Tax Invoice ACC Legal Aid Fixed Fees Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from to Interim invoice Final invoice Forum Category 1 2 N...

9. [2011] NZEmpC 97 Quan Enterprises Ltd v Fair [pdf, 65 KB]

   ...Ms Wickes, on behalf of the plaintiff, stated: 2. It appears from the affidavit sworn by the Defendant, she received that statement of claim on 18 January 2011 yet took no steps to file a defence at that stage. [10] Subsequently, the Court requested a further affidavit clarifying certain factual matters and it was not until that affidavit from Mr Fair was received on 7 July 2011 that it became clear that all Mrs Fair had received on 18 January 2011 had been the determination of...

10. Doria v Diamond Laser Medispa Taupo Ltd (Stay) [2019] NZHRRT 20 [pdf, 171 KB]

    ...the hearing. [7] A procedural teleconference was scheduled to take place on 7 February 2019. Prior to the teleconference, Mr Brant filed a memorandum confirming his instructions to take review proceedings in respect of the strike-out decision and requesting that the teleconference be adjourned for two weeks, by which time the proceedings would have been filed and served. This adjournment application was granted, and the teleconference was rescheduled to 21 February 2019. 3 [8]...