Search Results

1. [2024] NZEmpC 183 Auckland Trotting Club Inc v Payne [pdf, 343 KB]

   ...These proceedings involve a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority, where it was determined that Graham Payne was entitled to be paid commission from 14 April 2016 to 21 August 2021 in accordance with the commission formula in his 2013 individual employment agreement (IEA).1 [2] The proceedings were initially filed as a de novo challenge but were later amended to a non-de novo challenge. The issues were narrowed by agreement. 1 Payne v Auckland Trot...

2. A Q v Mudaliar [2015] NZIACDT 76 (23 June 2015) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...enough to require the police clearance. Mr Mudaliar did not raise this point with Immigration New Zealand. [1.5] Mr Mudaliar decided to proceed to obtain a police clearance. Because, the complainant had become unlawful in New Zealand, he lodged a request under section 61 of the Immigration Act 2009. It is a discretionary provision. He submitted the police clearance, but resubmitted the same job description that Immigration New Zealand rejected earlier. He did not provide reasons why Immi...

3. [2013] NZEmpC 82 Tan v Morningstar Institute of Education Ltd t/a Morningstar Preschool [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...could be made by the defendant. 1 [2012] NZERA Auckland 208. 2 [2012] NZERA Auckland 303. [2] At the conclusion of the hearing I gave an informal indication of the preliminary views I had formed and invited parties to endeavour to settle the matter. I was advised by memoranda on 11 December 2012 that the parties had not discussed the possibility of settlement, as I had contemplated in the indications I gave in open Court....

4. D (D G Family Trust) v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2019] CEIT-2019-0037 [pdf, 605 KB]

   IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEIT-0037-2019 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN C F D, R D G AND D R S (AS TRUSTEES OF THE D G FAMILY TRUST Applicants AND IAG NEW ZEALAND LIMITED First Respondent AND MAX CONTRACTS LIMITED Second Respondent AND MAX EQ LIMITED Third Respondent AND ORANGE H MANAGEMENT LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP AND IN LIQUIDATION) Fourt

5. Cabinet paper - Tyson Gregory Redman application for compensation for wrongful conviction and imprisonment: next steps [pdf, 4.4 MB]

   ...convictions and imprisonment, s 9(2)(a) 9. In respect of compensation for pecuniary loss , Dr Stevens also recommended that the amounts referred to in paragraph 7 be augmented by payment of: 9.1. Mr Redman's legal costs in bringing the compensation claim (once the amount is finalised); and 9.2. Mr Redman's costs of receiving counselling and therapy s 9(2)(a) over two years and up to a maximum of $21 ,700 including GST, to treat the mental and emotional harm caused by the...

6. Hopps v Accident Compensation Corporation (Treatment Injury) [2025] NZACC 014 (28 January 2025) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...AVL Appearances: The Appellant is self-represented (attended with her husband B Hopps) L Hansen for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 28 January 2025 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for treatment injury - ss 32-33, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 23 January 2024. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review of the Corp...

7. BO v YL [2015] NZDT 773 (13 April 2015) [pdf, 16 KB]

   ...product. [9] It is of note BB asked BO to provide him with further evidence - two boards (once removed) - to assist him to identify the proximate cause and determine whether the claim can be accepted or declined. I take from this request that BB could not conclude there had been a product failure on the evidence available to him and his report provided interim findings that were subject to further investigation. [10] AA stated that had the product failed he would have...

8. Stanimirovic v Levarko [2018] NZIACDT 3 (7 February 2018) [pdf, 350 KB]

   ...adviser, lawyer or included in certain other specific categories of persons. There are some limited exceptions to the general principle, but the restriction applies everywhere in the world. [3] The regime requires licensed immigration advisers to perform the services personally. They are different from other professionals who can usually allow non-qualified staff to provide many services under the supervision of a qualified professional. [4] Unfortunately, there have been a series...

9. Waitangi Tribunal - Part 1 The alienation of Māori land in Rohe Potae [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...Theme Q: The Foreshore, R P Boast © Copyright Waitangi Tribunal 1996 FOREWORD The research report that follows is one of a series of historical surveys commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal as part of its Rangahaua Whanui programme. In its present form, it has the status of a working paper: first release. It is published now so that claimants and other interested parties can be aware of its contents and, should they so wish, comment on them and add further information and insights. The pu...

10. Savage v Adlam – Lot 39A Sec 2A Parish of Matatā (2014) 95 Waiariki MB 176 (95 WAR 176) [pdf, 561 KB]

    ...called TG2. The second was commissioned in September 2008 by Geothermal Developments Limited (“GDL”). [4] TG2 was undertaken by Ms Adlam in conjunction with her co-trustees and the second power station development proceeded with was the formation of the company Onepu Geothermal Energy Limited (“OGEL”) which was intended to be the vehicle for the development of the KA24 well which is situated on the Farm block land. [5] Prior to the establishment of either power station Ms...