Search Results

1. Enviro Waste Services Ltd v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claim for Work Related Injury) [2024] NZACC 28 [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...Held at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau Appearances: S Cook and M Smith for the Appellant K Anderson for the Accident Compensation Corporation (“the Corporation”) Judgment: 14 February 2024 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for deemed decision - ss 135, 146; claim for work-related personal injury – ss 28 and 30, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 28 February 2023....

2. [2022] NZEmpC 58 GF v Comptroller of the New Zealand Customs Service [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...Kynaston and H Khan, counsel for defendant Judgment: 30 March 2022 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 4) OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS (Application for further and better particulars) Introduction [1] The plaintiff has filed a statement of claim challenging a determination of the Employment Relations Authority.1 The claim follows the plaintiff’s dismissal from 1 GF v New Zealand Customs Service [2021] NZERA 382 (Member Beck). An amended statement of claim was subs...

3. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 57 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 571 KB]

   ...Hapü within six months of the signing of the media- tion agreement. It is expected the governing body, Te Röpü Matua, will have the robust mandate required by the claims process to effectively par- ticipate throughout. The hapü have also formed a new claims committee Te Röpü Whenua, comprising three members from both former claims. They will ensure their claims are particularised and filed as required by the Tribunal under the new approach. This agreement is of importance...

4. AS v YC Ltd [2022] NZDT 75 (9 June 2022) [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...teleconference. As calls made to the number provided went unanswered, the hearing proceeded in their absence. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 Referee: K. Edwards Date: 9 June 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

5. MD v EQ [2024] NZDT 592 (5 September 2024) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...crossing and also riding further from his car (eg 1.5m) the collision would not have occurred, and he would not have sustained damage to his vehicle. 9. Rule 7.2 is a legally bound duty that drivers must follow. The [International driving website] information and the [NZ driving website] information is provided for cyclists to ride more safely but they are not New Zealand law. One might argue it was prudent for MD to be taking account of these safe riding guides, but they are not legall...

6. [2015] NZEmpC 24 Lowe v Director-General of Health, Ministry of Health & Ors [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...many days per year it has allocated to a full-time carer for support. Once the Ministry receives notification, it sends out the Carer Support form to the full-time carer for the full- time carer and support carer to complete and return when they claim for payment of Carer Support. 2. Payment of Carer Support is through Sector Operations, a shared payment agency that administers payments on behalf of the Ministry and all District Health Boards (DHBs). Generally, if a client is un...

7. Gray v Ministry for Children (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...following terms: Commissioner’s opinion: • application of principle(s) • adverse consequences • interference with privacy No opinion, complaint withdrawn – section 71(1)(d). Principle 6 and Principle 7 – No final view formed. N/A No final view formed. Mr Gray’s claim [7] In these proceedings filed with the Tribunal on 30 November 2017 Mr Gray alleges the Ministry for Children breached information privacy principles 6 and 7. Mr Gray also allege...

8. EI v SB & HS [2015] NZDT 1437 (28 October 2015) [pdf, 300 KB]

   ...consisting of “approximately sixty current customers who are on month to month hosting agreements.” 3. The applicant company (EI), who was represented by QU, expressed an interest in submitting a tender for the assets and sought further information from HS. In furtherance of this HS sent to EI a confidentiality agreement and the terms and conditions for the tender. 4. QU, on behalf of EI, signed the confidentiality agreement on 8 December 2014. The other party to the agreemen...

9. CP Ltd v ES [2022] NZDT 193 (20 September 2022) [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...failed to do so in a reasonable time, ES is entitled to pay a third party to supply and install doors and windows for her cabin and recover that cost from CP Ltd under section 32(a)(ii)(A). 13. At the second hearing, ES provided evidence in the form of a written quotation from a joinery supplier to show that the cost of supply and installation of doors and windows for the cabin will be $5554.50 (that was the lowest of three quotations presented). Was the cabin of acceptable quality...

10. SP v GC Ltd [2024] NZDT 500 (17 June 2024) [pdf, 202 KB]

    ...costs to remedy the problems with SP’s roof were $3,029.00 ($529.00 plus $2,500.00). For these reasons I order that GC Ltd is liable to pay SP $3,029.00. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 17 June 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...