CAC 20004 v Kolich & Anor [2014] NZREADT 66 [pdf, 124 KB]
...he and his colleague (a Mr Vasan) had met with Mr Vithal after the contract was signed but denied telling Mr Vithal that he did not need to reply to correspondence. [10] It is the assertion by Mr Vithal that Mr Kolich was to receive payment that forms the basis of the charge against Mr Kolich. [11] The Tribunal heard a great deal of evidence about the dissent at the Society and the factions which had formed, some were pro Mr Kolich and some were against him. Each party appeared to...