Search Results

1. [2025] NZEmpC 44 Mutonhori v Wairoa District Council [pdf, 276 KB]

   ...use and if so, to confirm whether permission had been given by the Chief Executive in advance of any private trips so that she could complete the Council’s Fringe Benefit Tax return correctly. [7] Mr Mutonhori did not supply the information requested. At the hearing, he continued to maintain that he had not been required to fill in an FBT form before and there was nothing in his employment agreement that required him to do so. [8] After he had not answered the Senior Financial...

2. XT Ltd v N [2017] NZDT 1458 (6 March 2017) [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...entitled to recover the actual cost of the repairs, as proved by the invoices provided and approved by the B assessor. The sum payable is therefore $4,923.07. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 6 March 2017 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to...

3. DX v E Ltd & ET [2022] NZDT 170 (30 September 2022) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...amount that he has paid to a company that does not exist. 12. For the above reasons, ET is to pay $19,665.00 to DX before 30 October 2022. Referee: L Thompson Date: 30 September 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

4. LN v HN & FN [2024] NZDT 271 (4 April 2024) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 271 APPLICANT LN RESPONDENT HN SECOND RESPONDENT FN The Tribunal orders: 1. FN shall, by no later than 15 May 2024, update the NAIT information on the 23 calves that he tagged, to show that ownership of the calves is transferred / reverted to LN. 2. If this is not completed by 15 May 2024, FN must pay LN $9,200.00 immediately. Reasons 1. LN and FN are brothers. HN

5. LC & NS v O Ltd [2024] NZDT 462 (13 June 2024) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...headboard at no cost to them. Failure to do so will result in O Ltd being liable to pay to LC and NS the retail value of the headboard which M said was $500.00. Referee: R Merrett Date: 13 June 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

6. C Ltd v HQ [2024] NZDT 602 (4 July 2024) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...any of the alleged deductions from the unpaid amount are valid deductions. As a result, HQ is required to pay the full remaining amount of the invoice, $19,901.86. Referee: M Wilson Date: 4 July 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

7. TU v CI [2025] NZDT 58 (4 March 2025) [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...director to reimburse him for that loss. 7. It is unnecessary to consider the remaining issues. The director must pay $30,000.00 to the client. E Paton-Simpson Disputes Tribunal Referee 04 March 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

8. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Hamilton [2012] NZHRRT 24 [pdf, 120 KB]

   ...husband and wife trading in partnership) sought access to the personal information held about them by Mr Hamilton. He concedes that with the exception of a “token gesture” which saw him release “peripheral” documents in December 2011, the requested access has not yet been given by him. The primary issue in these proceedings is whether Mr Hamilton has a proper basis for not complying with the request and if not, the nature of the remedies to be granted. 2 Preliminary matt...

9. [2019] NZEmpC 151 Zhang v Telco Asset Management Ltd [pdf, 537 KB]

   ...employment relationship problem it was required to resolve. It stated Mr Zhang had been employed by Telco at its Wellington office for almost five and a half years until 14 April 2017 when his position was disestablished. Summary of relevant information [10] The Authority then referred to three particular topics. [11] First, it noted that Telco was one of a group of seven companies; and that, between August 2015 and early 2017, three of these were divested from the group.

10. A Nair v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 32 (19 March 2014 ) [pdf, 147 KB]

    ...residence visa. [2] The adviser was acting for him; she did not lodge the application until his current visa had expired. The result was Immigration New Zealand could not consider his application. [3] The complainant says he provided all the information requested. In addition, a staff member in the adviser’s practice told him the adviser had a relationship with Immigration New Zealand that guaranteed his application would be successful. [4] The adviser says the complainant failed to...