EP v UK LTD & UKU LTD 2016 NZDT 893 (7 December 2016) [pdf, 137 KB]
...[4] EP says that the original gear issue has not been resolved and the car is not driveable as well as being in a considerably worse state cosmetically than when she delivered it to UK Ltd. She questions how it obtained a WOF in December 2014 and requests a refund of the amount paid as well as a declaration of non-liability for the balance of the amount invoiced by UK Ltd, plus compensation for tow costs, registration and insurance and remedy to the cosmetic issues evident on the car...