Search Results

Search results for claim form.

11129 items matching your search terms

  1. Gower v KPH Construction Ltd [2010] NZWHT Auckland 2 [pdf, 85 KB]

    IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-100-000080 [2010] NZWHT AUCKLAND 2 BETWEEN KEVIN GOWER Claimant AND KPH CONSTRUCTION LIMITED First Respondent Hearing: 17 February 2010 Appearances: Claimant in person C Patterson, for the first respondent Decision: 25 February 2010 FINAL DETERMINATION Adjudicator: P J Andrew Page | 2 INTRODUCTION [1] The claimant, Mr Gower, owns a house on the Kari Kari Peninsula in Northland

  2. [2021] NZEmpC 150 Ututaonga v North Western Farms Ltd [pdf, 183 KB]

    ...on behalf of Mr Ututaonga describe in detail Mr Ututaonga’s substantive claim. They include serious allegations about North Western Farms, Mr Smith and counsel. Mrs Henare’s submissions conclude that Mrs Henare was unaware that she could request an extension of time for filing a challenge until advised by the Employment Court. The Court considers various matters in such an application [14] Where a person applies for the exercise of the Court’s discretion to extend time f...

  3. Andrews v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2025] NZACC 17 (29 January 2025) [pdf, 208 KB]

    ...[18] Meanwhile, Mr Andrews sought advice from Mr Boyle, Orthopaedic Surgeon. Mr Boyle filed an assessment report and treatment plan (ARTP) requesting surgery funding in January 2021. The ARTP referenced the March 2005 accident. [19] The surgery requested was considered by Dr Fong, Principal Clinical Advisor. Ultimately the Corporation accepted liability and approved surgery funding on 4 February 2021. At that stage cover was updated to cover biceps tendinitis, a glenoid labrum tea...

  4. Deeming v Whangarei District Council [2015] NZHRRT 55 [pdf, 121 KB]

    ...proving one of the exceptions in Principle 11, the Tribunal must then determine whether the disclosure constituted an interference with the individual’s privacy as defined in s 66 of the Privacy Act. That is, has the plaintiff established one of the forms of actual or potential harm contemplated by [s 66(1)]. The burden of proof reverts to the plaintiff at this stage. [190.4] Fourth, if the Tribunal is satisfied to this stage, then its final task is to determine whether, in its disc...

  5. Reekie v Corrections (Extension of Time) [2018] NZHRRT 15 [pdf, 73 KB]

    ...Corrections (Extension of Time) [2018] NZHRRT 15] 2 [3] By memorandum dated 13 April 2018 the Chief Executive, Department of Corrections has sought an extension of time for filing his statement of reply until 30 May 2018. The grounds of the request are: [3.1] This claim relates to events that occurred between March 2012 and April 2015. It is proving time-consuming and difficult for Corrections to isolate the documents that may be relevant to this claim and which will enable...

  6. [2023] NZEmpC 160 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment v Airways Corp of New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 113 KB]

    ...Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: G La Hood, counsel for plaintiff G Davenport, counsel for defendants Judgment: 25 September 2023 CONSENT JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL [1] In the statement of claim filed by the plaintiff in this case, it sought declarations under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act) in respect of three individuals, one of whom was Stuart Balchin. It was alleged he was an employee of either or bot...

  7. Online manual HCC Policy and procedures v3.2 [pdf, 359 KB]

    High Cost Case Management (HCC) Policy and procedure Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely upon the informatio

  8. [2019] NZEmpC 132 Chief Executive of Manukau Institute of Technology v Zivaljevic [pdf, 300 KB]

    ...[2010] NZEmpC 142, [2010] ERNZ 468. [20] He says his understanding was that the obligation MIT had to put the best candidates into roles applied only after the redeployment avenues were exhausted. [21] He couches his comments as a request for MIT’s view and asks Mr Bhimy to consult MIT’s legal team. He says: I expect your comment on this as this is one of the important points that contributed to my personal grievance. [22] Mr Zivaljevic also asked for informat...

  9. [2015] NZEmpC 44 Mana Coach Services Ltd v the New Zealand Tramways and Public Transport Employees Union [pdf, 401 KB]

    ...number 17 on a particular day. This run number would determine the driver’s start and finish times as well as the routes to be driven. The matrix roster was constructed taking account of known or anticipated need for passenger bus services, requests for leave, adherence to maximum statutory driving hours and other such factors. [12] Variables, which resulted in alterations to the matrix roster arising within the period between its posting and particular days of duty, might inclu...

  10. [2010] NZEmpC 53 Mars NZ Ltd v MCWU & anor [pdf, 15 KB]

    ...at short notice. The application did not, however, proceed with further discussion between the parties being facilitated which resulted in an interim solution being reached pending a substantive hearing. These arrangements were recorded in the form of undertakings set out in the Court’s oral judgment of 1 March 2010.1 [4] The defendants claim $2,000 towards costs, being 16 hours of executive time for three separate union officers at the rate of $120 per hour plus stationery, tel...