Search Results

1. Meek v Ministry of Social Development [2013] NZHRRT 28 [pdf, 53 KB]

   ...accommodation expenses. [6] Mr Meek arranged for his modest household effects to be packed and moved from Christchurch to Wellington where they were placed in temporary storage. On 6 March 2011 he attended the Ministry’s Christchurch Service Centre to request assistance with his relocation expenses and the anticipated travel and accommodation expenses for his trip from Christchurch to Wellington. He was told to wait until he heard from his insurance company before applying for assist...

2. Watson v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2024] NZACC 110 (2 July 2024) [pdf, 276 KB]

   ...April 2010, Dr McHardy GP listed CRPS as a complication which was repeatedly confirmed by other GPs. [9] In June 2010, the Corporation referred Ms Watson to Dr Waite, Occupational Physician, for assessment, noting it required further medical information on cover and to provide recommendations for rehabilitation. 1 Watson v Accident Compensation Corporation [2024] NZACC 002. 3 [10] On 21 June 2010, Dr Waite provided a medical assessment of Ms Watson. Dr Waite provided a re...

3. Mane-Waihou A8C1B1 (2018) 169 Taitokerau MB 108 (169 TTK 108) [pdf, 602 KB]

   ...Town and Coastal Limited. I note in this regard that Mr Carson’s draft survey plan shows two severances in favour of Barney, being an area of 1550m² and a separate severance of 300m². Judge Spencer did not consider the 300m² area should form part of an occupation order. The larger area approximates to the 2001 occupation order site. 15 31 Taitokerau MB 183 (31 TTK 183). 169 Taitokerau MB 116 A20100007072 – s 19(1)(a...

4. ABY v ZYF [2013] NZDT 125 (17 September 2013) [pdf, 47 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 125 BETWEEN ABY APPLICANT AND ZYF Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 17 September 2013 Referee: Referee Hannan ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Respondent, ZYF Ltd, pay directly to the Applicant, ABY, the sum of $610.00 on or before 17 August 2011. The Respondent is entitled to retain possession of the Acer computer in question. Facts [1] The Applicant

5. ADI v ZWR Ltd [2011] NZDT 168 (8 April 2011) [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...a 24 hour 7 day Pay and Display car park.” [4] I accept that ADI’s children did not see the signs at the entry/exit displaying the closing time for the car park and that on the basis of the sign they saw at the ticket machine that they formed the view that the car park was open 24/7. [5] ADI’s children had paid for parking until 8:00 am the following day. This was prominently displayed on the parking receipt obtained by ADI’s children. The terms and conditions disp...

6. ACB v ZYC and ZYB [2010] NZDT 77 (9 November 2010) [pdf, 79 KB]

   ...Date of Order: 9 November 2010 Referee: Referee C Smith ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Respondents pay the Applicant the sum of $2,534.37 directly within 21 days of today’s date. The counterclaim is dismissed due to failure of proof. Facts [1] The material facts are that the parties are neighbours. The Applicant, ACB, has brought a claim under the Fencing Act 1978 requesting that the boundary fence between her and the...

7. CEIT practice notes: COVID-19 [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...court of law; • require the applicant or another party to provide documents or other information relating to the application within any reasonable period that the Chair may, from time to time, specify; • make the indicative ruling without the requested documents should they not be supplied within the specified time; • issue directions to accompany the indicative ruling setting the claim down for hearing; or • assign the hearing of the claim to any other member who has not...

8. [2021] NZACC 121 - Kemp v ACC (3 August 2021) [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...Respondent Hearing: 13 July 2021 Held at: Hamilton/Kirikiriroa Appearances: The appellant is self-represented A Miller for the Accident Compensation Corporation Judgment: 3 August 2021 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for treatment injury, s 32, Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 18 July 2016. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review declining treatment injury cover...

9. LCRO 174/2017 DN v CI [pdf, 328 KB]

   ...made an error by not obtaining the School’s consent to the assignment of the Cleaning Contract before the conditions in the Agreement were satisfied; (b) did not give him clear information and advice; and (c) by not contacting the Broker to request the return of the deposit Ms CI did not protect his interests. Standards Committee decision [10] The Committee delivered its decision on 16 August 2017 and determined, pursuant to s 138(2) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (t...

10. Otimi v Fa'uhiva - Hauhungaroa 1A3 (2019) 401 Aotea MB 102 (401 AOT 102) [pdf, 382 KB]

    ...announcement of the results at the marae, several submissions from concerned beneficiaries have been filed as to the conduct of the meeting by Court staff. In summary, two specific concerns were raised. First, that there were insufficient voting forms which resulted in hand written forms being used thereby raising questions as to the integrity of the vote. 1 Otimi v Fa'uhiva - Hauhungaroa 1A3 (Poukura Pā) (2018) 394 A...