Search Results

1. Review of the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004 Post Consultation Decisions [pdf, 993 KB]

   ...foreshore and seabed. 2. This is the second RIS prepared in relation to the Review of the 2004 Act. The first RIS analysed the preliminary policy options for replacing the 2004 Act as one possible outcome of the Review. Its purpose was to inform Ministerial decisions on the Government’s preferred policy option which was set out in a public discussion document. This RIS only briefly addresses the status quo, problem definition and objective of the Review, which were covered in mor...

2. UB v KL [2020] NZDT 1372 (13 November 2020) [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...offering instead for him to use her kitchen and to get Sky installed (which UB would have to pay for and which he did not want). 3. UB stayed two nights and moved out on the third day, notifying KL in writing of this intention and his reasons, and requesting a refund of his bond and rent in advance. KL declined any refund and UB claims $900.00. 4. The issues to determine are: • Did KL misrepresent what was being offered in terms of accommodation for rent? • If so, what are U...

3. DL-Fact-Sheet-v4.pdf [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...court or national scheduling team has advised your duty lawyer attendance is cancelled. - You are on-call and the court has advised you are not required to attend court for the day. Examples of when minimum payment is not available: - You have requested to finish early due to personal reasons or other commitments. - You have taken time away from duty lawyer work for private work or personal time (e.g., lunch) and the actual duty lawyer work hours are less than the minimum payment...

4. Review of the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004 Analysis of Replacement Regimes [pdf, 465 KB]

   ...the 2004 Act will be repealed and replaced by a new regime: Cabinet has not made this decision. It is possible to retain or amend the 2004 Act or repeal it and not replace it; is written with a particular purpose in mind: its purpose is to inform preliminary decisions in order for a preferred option to be taken out for public consultation. This consultation will ask fundamental policy questions (e.g. should customary interests be tested?). A final decision on the preferred option...

5. Ching v Regmi & Ors [2014] NZWHT Auckland 4 [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...He stated that there is a lack of fall to the top surface balcony balustrade which consequently allows moisture to pond and ingress at any cracks or pinhole penetrations in the texture coating and paint finish. He also stated that gaps have formed between the fibre cement sheet to the balustrade and the timber facing which provides paths for moisture ingress. [11] The second major defect concerns the deck cladding which is in contact with the deck tiles. [12] The instal...

6. Flutey - Papatupu 2A No 2 (2017) 363 Aotea MB 258 (363 AOT 258) [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...discussed at the last hearing. If they wish to make submissions on what if any deductions should be made for the costs of planting and maintaining the forest then they should do so within the timeframe specified, noting the earlier adjournment and the request for submissions then. Evidence in support of any alternative position should also be filed within one month. … [32] Should no response to this direction be received from Mr Parker or his clients then I give notice now that...

7. [2018] NZEmpC 159 X v The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 365 KB]

   ...immediately. [14] The defendant considers that the costs it incurred after making the settlement offer were unnecessarily incurred. In February and March 2018, the defendant incurred an additional $29,980.91 in legal fees. The $15,000 uplift requested is, therefore, slightly more than 50 per cent of those fees. [15] The plaintiff acknowledged a settlement offer was made, but disputed the appropriateness of an uplift, because he maintained he was justified in rejecting the offe...

8. What happens next

   ...papers’.   ‘On the papers’ means the tribunal will make its decision based on the documents the parties have provided. That means parties don’t attend a hearing. The hearing The tribunal can decide whether or not a case should go to a formal hearing or if it can be heard on the papers. If the tribunal decides your case should have a formal hearing, we’ll contact you to let you know what the next steps will be. At a hearing, the people involved (every party) can attend and be...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Copyright >
   3. File sharing infringements

9. Auckland District Law Society v Parlane [2010] NZLCDT 26 [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...position, and advised the parties that it anticipated being able to make a decision later that day, and would deliver its decision to the parties, in writing, as soon as it could. The Tribunal retired, and after deliberation made its decision and requested the Chair to deliver the decision in writing to the parties. This is the Tribunal‟s decision of 13 September, 2010, now delivered in writing by the Chair pursuant to R.34 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Disciplinary Tribunal) Reg...

10. Auckland District Law Society v Parlane [2010] NZLCDT 26 [pdf, 110 KB]

    ...position, and advised the parties that it anticipated being able to make a decision later that day, and would deliver its decision to the parties, in writing, as soon as it could. The Tribunal retired, and after deliberation made its decision and requested the Chair to deliver the decision in writing to the parties. This is the Tribunal’s decision of 13 September, 2010, now delivered in writing by the Chair pursuant to R.34 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Disciplinary Tribunal) Reg...