Search Results

1. Xu v Noon [2014] NZIACDT 46 (08 April 2014) [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...conditions and the like. [12] The complainant’s Statement of Reply contained an additional allegation that the adviser failed to comply with the Code of Conduct in relation to written agreements (clause 1.5). The Tribunal in its interim decision informed the adviser that he was at risk of an adverse finding on that issue also. 3 Opportunity to respond [13] The interim decision noted the adviser disputed the alleged facts. [14] As matters stood, it was not possible to...

2. LCRO 255/2016 WR v VB (4 March 2019) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...the grounds that these were the invoices considered by the Employment Court which found them to be reasonable.13 However, they too, were calculated on the basis of the time expended only. [28] The Committee did not call for Mr VB’s files or request a formal costs assessment by an independent costs assessor. However, it is assumed members of the Committee included lawyers who practice in an area of law similar to, if not the same as, the areas of law under consideration here. The...

3. CS & KS v H Ltd [2023] NZDT 605 (13 November 2023) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...bracket/cabinet which is attached to the house by tek-screws, and into which the cabling is mounted, and the Inverter itself, which hinges into the bracket at the top. 6. The Inverter has internal sensors which allow for errors or issues with its performance to be monitored online. The log of the sensors shows that there were isolation errors, (code 475) which occurred on 10, 11, and 13 June 2022, 27 July 2022, and on 12 and 13 September 2022. Code 475 is a code which relates to th...

4. DN v TT & CB [2024] NZDT 880 (28 August 2024) [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...Tribunal orders: 1. TT trading as R Ltd is to pay $6,016.21 to DN on or before 5.00pm on 23 September 2024 2. The claim against CB is dismissed. Reasons 1. DN saw a [Car] (registration [redacted]) advertised for sale on [an online sales platform]. She and her husband arranged with CB, who answered the telephone number in the advertisement, to view the car at [an address] on 26 November 2023. TT’s car yard, R Ltd1 is located at this address. CB was looking after the car y...

5. Carley (INZ) v B [2015] NZIACDT 96 (17 November 2015) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...Complaint identified two potential breaches of the 2010 Code, and one arising under the Act. In essence they were: [7.1] Ms B breached clause 1.1(a) and (b) of the Licensed Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2010 (the 2010 Code) in that she did not perform her services, and carry out her instructions with due care, diligence and professionalism. The particulars were: 3 [7.1.1] She was the sole licensee in the practice where she worked since March 2009, and was responsible...

6. [2019] NZEmpC 86 Lyttleton Port Company Ltd v Pender [pdf, 325 KB]

   ...within Mr Pender’s group. Mr Pender viewed this as a vacancy to which he should be appointed. The company did not view things in this way. Mr Pender surmised that this was because he was pursuing a personal grievance. The April 2018 issue formed the basis for a second claim of unjustifiable disadvantage. [4] The Authority upheld Mr Pender’s claim, awarded him $800 by way of reimbursement for lost wages and $12,500 compensation under s 123(1)(c)(i) of the Employment Relations...

7. 2024-07-22-Notice-of-Hearing-QAC-v-RPL.pdf [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...Management (Forms, Fees and Procedure) Regulations 2003. The time allocated by the Court provides an indication of your potential liability for Court hearing fees in this case. 2 PROCEDURES At the start of the hearing, the Court will consider any requests to: (a) Withdraw proceedings (b) Adjourn (postpone) hearings to a later date (c) Approve settlements agreed to all by the parties The Court will then decide the order in which the proceedings will be heard during the hearing...

8. Beauchamp v B & T Co (2011) Ltd [2022] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...does not hire pregnant women. [69] Mr Tan denied Ms Du cared about how Ms Beauchamp looked when she was pregnant. He said they would have supported her to work until February if she wanted to. He said she could have come back but that she never requested to come back to work, and he didn’t understand what that was about. Ms Rijal [70] Ms Rijal waitressed at Adzuki Café from 2016 to 2019. She started in August 2016 shortly after she arrived in New Zealand from Nepal and was very...

9. [2025] NZEmpC 157 Allied Investments Ltd v Jones [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...the event, Mr Jones did not receive his commission payments as expected in the middle of January, with Mr Black advising Ms Hunt that Mr Jones would have to wait because the information was “not forthcoming from those from whom it was requested, in particular the employment agreement”. Mr Black offered to make a $5,000 payment from Allied Security to Mr Jones towards the end of January 2022 while the amount due to him was finalised. Mr Jones accepted that arrangement a...

10. APB Ltd v VW LCRO 133 / 2010 (3 August 2011) [pdf, 126 KB]

    ...Practitioner had perceived that the fund was intended to protect the developer rather than as a comfort fund for the Applicant. He said that being aware of the terms of the Deed, prior to authorising the payment he discussed the developer‟s request with a senior lawyer in the firm, and notwithstanding their awareness of the terms and conditions of the Deed, it was perceived by them that the payment requested by their client in the particular circumstances that the request had been...