Search Results

1. KN v XD Inc [2024] NZDT 131 (4 March 2024) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...the above reasons XD Inc is to pay $395.00 to KN before 4 April 2024, and also to provide him with a parlour case that is in good condition before the same date. Referee: L Thompson Date: 4 March 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

2. BM & OT v OE & DE [2023] NZDT 459 (5 July 2023) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...remained the owners of this property they would have incurred this repair cost themselves. 17. Finally, my apologises to both parties for the time it has taken to issue this decision. Referee: A Hayes Date: 5/7/23 Information for Parties Page 4 of 4 Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you...

3. UI v T Ltd [2025] NZDT 11 (27 January 2025) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...liable to pay the $65.00 fee? Did UI breach the contract by parking without registering for the 90 minutes free parking CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 5 and without paying for the additional 99 minutes? 7. A legally binding contract is formed where both parties agree to contract on agreed terms. For a contract to be enforceable the terms of the contract need to be certain and clear and there must be consideration. Consideration is something of value given to someone in return f...

4. KI v KB [2024] NZDT 467 (5 June 2024) [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...was selling a mechanically unsound vehicle because he stated “only selling as moving overseas”, but he has not moved overseas. KB explained why his family’s plans to move [overseas] had changed after they sold the vehicle, and based on the information I have, I cannot read anything into his stated intention in the ad to move overseas. 8. The key statements to consider in terms of misrepresentation are “regularly serviced” as written in the ad, and, in the questions section ...

5. UN v X Ltd [2024] NZDT 595 (17 July 2024) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...have occurred. 19. The appropriate remedy is therefore the lower of the two quoted amounts for a full re-coat of the joinery, being $18,656.97. Referee Perfect Date: 17 July 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

6. SZ v U Ltd [2025] NZDT 116 (13 February 2025) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...for providing a loan car for 3 days, charging the car’s battery, removing allegedly contaminated fuel and replacing with petrol, replacing 4 spark plugs, scanning the engine for faults, replacing 2 cam sensors, consumables and labour. SZ sought information on the invoice and requested a breakdown of labour costs. No response was received. 4. On 4 January 2024, in order to recover the car Mr F paid the invoice under protest. Mr F has confirmed that there is an arrangement between him...

7. [2017] NZEmpC 97 Nel v ASB Bank [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...cases, there were many examples of conduct which were petty, although obviously disruptive. That conduct needed to be managed and may have required disciplinary action. However, it was not remotely close to that of a senior manager who had formed a romantic attachment to a relatively junior subordinate. A further distinguishing feature was that Mr Nel was a senior manager in charge of Ms A; a manager’s role was to lead by 37...

8. The Trustees of Part Rotomaha Parekarangi 8 Reservation v Cochrane - Part Rotomahana Pakrekarangi 8 Reservation (2020) 247 Waiariki MB 34 (247 WAR 34) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...If further time is needed, then counsel should advise the case manager. [23] The orders for discovery as sought by Mr Harvey in paragraph 73 (f) of his memorandum dated 7 September are granted. Counsel are directed to provide the documents as requested in accordance with the timeframes requested. [24] Mr Fisher is directed to respond to Mr Harvey’s 7 September 2020 memorandum urgently. Failing any satisfactory response, the order as set out in paragraph 73 (g) of Mr Harvey’s m...

9. [2007] NZEmpC WC 29/07 Hawkins v Commissioner of Police [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...discharged under s347 of the Crimes Act 1961 2 years later. Mr Brosnahan then wrote a detailed letter on 7 November 2003 to Russell Gibson, human resources manager, who had taken over from District Commander Lammas, in which he provided the details requested in 2001 and specified the remedies sought including reinstatement. [12] The parties then attended mediation which was unsuccessful and Mr Hawkins commenced proceedings in the Employment Relations Authority. The first...

10. Zhang v Samsung Electronics New Zealand Ltd (Strike Out Application) [2023] NZHRRT 42 [pdf, 175 KB]

    ...Dr NR Swain, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr T Zhang in person Mr J Edwards and Ms BJ Shone for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 27 May 2021 DATE OF DECISION: 20 December 2023 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT THE STATEMENT OF CLAIM1 [1] Mr Zhang alleged that Samsung Electronics New Zealand Ltd (Samsung NZ) discriminated against him in breach of s 44(1)(b) of the Human Rights Act 1993 (HRA) (which relates to the supply of goods or services) on the basis of his rac