Search Results

Search results for claim form.

5259 items matching your search terms

  1. Reweti - Part Waikoukou No 406 (2015) 96 Taitokerau MB 231 (96 TTK 231) [pdf, 259 KB]

    ...Native Land Court awarded the Waikoukou block to Paora Tuhaere and Wiremu Reweti Te Whenua. [3] Between 1884 and 1908, parts of the Waikoukou block were gifted to (and later taken by) the Crown for railway purposes. This includes the land now forming Lot 1 and 2. Following the corporatisation of New Zealand Railways, Lot 1 and 2 were declared to be surplus Crown land. In 2001 Lot 1 and 2 were vested back into Paora and Wiremu as the original owners. [4] Applications have now bee...

  2. [2012] NZEmpC 207 Hutton and Others v Provencocadamus Ltd (in receivership) [pdf, 252 KB]

    ...advising that Ms Makaea (payroll administrator) had taken over responsibility for “processing the 11 Emphasis added. Payroll for all ProvencoCadmus staff effective from 11th August”, and requesting receipt of leave application and Inland Revenue forms (amongst other things). Mr Corrick sent out a further email later that day, having first passed a draft through Mr Gibson. 12 It emphasised that the “ProvencoCadmus” payr...

  3. Austin & Ors v Houghton & Ors [2014] NZWHT Auckland 6 [pdf, 72 KB]

    ...that allowed water ingress and that, as a result, the house required extensive remedial work. One of these defects was attributable to the original roofing work. The “kick out” to the ends of the apron flashings 4 were inadequately formed which allowed moisture to drain in behind the cladding. [12] After receiving the assessor’s report, the Austins obtained a report from another building expert, Barry Gill. Mr Gill commented that the inadequately formed kick ou...

  4. Miller-Hard v Stewart [pdf, 277 KB]

    ...moment. Therefore, I will issue this Determination which decides all other matters in this adjudication except for these two non-party claims for costs. 1.15 Mr Morrison, who was cited as the Fifth Respondent in this adjudication, made an informal application at the Hearing for recovery of his costs incurred when he was a party in the adjudication. He was struck out as a party in my Procedural Order No 6 on 11 March 2004. A formal claim for costs was made Claim No 0076...

  5. WHT - Chair's directions as to service [pdf, 34 KB]

    ...email. 13. When filing such an email application or request, or responding to it, the party filing or responding is required to copy the email communication to all other parties. If there is no email address for any party the Tribunal can be requested to arrange service on that party Hearing Documents 14. Each party is required to file electronic and hard copies of all their hearing documents with the Tribunal and either serve all other parties with hardcopies or provide...

  6. Legal aid criminal procedure simplication project - proceeding steps [pdf, 256 KB]

    ...matter adjourned to another day for sentence) Actual hours For: Attending hearing – including waiting time (see Granting Notes) If a guilty plea is entered at or before the hearing, then only the following guideline hours may be claimed: Activity Guideline Hours Tasks normally covered by Guideline Hours Guilty Plea entered before Hearing up to 3 hours plus the Fee for the appropriate Guilty Plea /Sentencing option - Step 1 For Preparing for defended h...

  7. Algie & Others v ACC [2013] NZACA 6 [pdf, 56 KB]

    ...claimed. [10] The appeal was founded on there being no financial outlay, but the services had to be “actual” to have any chance of coming within ss 121(1) and 80(1). There was no evidence whatsoever to suggest that the Corporation had ever formed the view that the services and attendances were not performed, and the wording of the standard form decision letters and the payment of attendant care by the same 3 caregivers for 18 of the appellants under the later legisl...

  8. NOP TUV v MBIE [2014] NZHRRT 16 [pdf, 156 KB]

    ...steps had been taken to ensure that having regard to the purpose for which the information was proposed to be used, the information was accurate, up to date, complete, relevant and not misleading. [4] The secondary issue is whether, in a subsequent request by the plaintiffs for access to personal information held by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, the Ministry had proper grounds for withholding certain information under s 27(1)(c) of the Privacy Act 1993. The Minist...

  9. Phon v Waitakere City Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 24 [pdf, 78 KB]

    ...situation is not comparable to the design. He implicitly acknowledges a causative link between the defects and the design could well be lacking. In addition, as in the other report, he confirms that details that were lacking from the plans (which formed the basis of the claim against the Council and Mr Kaill) were provided for in the Harditex technical information.

  10. LCRO 19/2016 OW v PG (29 September 2017) [pdf, 292 KB]

    ...inconvenience and costs. 3. As discussed at the meeting, we will need from each owner their conveyancing file. This is the file from your solicitor who acted for you when you purchased your unit. To that end, would you please fill in the enclosed form and return it to [TP] of this office. Her email address is [tp@ar.co.nz]. Once we have the form completed by you, we will send it to you[r] solicitor and obtain your conveyancing file. You need simply fill in your unit number, the...