Search Results

1. [2010] NZEmpC 6 Ora Ltd v Kirkley [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...submissions did not address the quantum of the costs he was seeking in either jurisdiction. From the exchange I had with counsel, Mr Brant sought to have costs reserved so there would be a final opportunity for the plaintiff to respond to Mrs Kirkley’s claims in that regard. There was a further complication in that costs were awarded against Mrs Kirkley in the High Court, a matter with which I cannot deal, but that may be addressed in the submissions. These submissions shoul...

2. [2012] NZEmpC 165 Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 68 KB]

   ...have had to have been canvassed. [10] In my judgment of 24 June 2011 I noted, for example, that there were 675 pages of “will say” statements on behalf of two chartered accounts and 598 pages in the two briefs of evidence of a forensic information technology analyst and accountant, filed on behalf of the plaintiff. There was considerable more material than that for counsel for the defendant to peruse. [11] Although not addressed in the memorandum, because of presumably the...

3. White v Rodney District Council [pdf, 24 KB]

   ...meaningful and sensible attempts to settle the claim. 9. The claimants then replied by stating that the second respondent misstates factual events and that essentially there is nothing in Mrs Kerkin’s response to deflect the claimants’ request that the Tribunal order an award of costs under section 91. 10. The claimants’ submissions expand on their allegation that Mrs Kerkin’s defence to the liability for breach of the vendor warranty claim lacked substantial...

4. O'Connor v MacDee McLennan Construction Limited [2011] NZWHT Auckland 67 [pdf, 156 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-101-000030 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 67 BETWEEN KAREN & IAN O’CONNOR Claimants AND MACDEE MCLENNAN CONSTRUCTION LIMITED First Respondent AND DUNCAN MCLENNAN Second Respondent AND PORIRUA CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND G KNOL Fourth Respondent Hearing: 23 June 2011 Appearances: P Robertson for the claimant Reeves for the first and second respondent P Robertson for the third respondent G Knol

5. Complaints Management Policy [pdf, 624 KB]

   ...recommended action involves cancellation of a provider’s approval. • A decision is made • any appropriate action is taken • the provider is notified • the complainant is notified, and • the provider is advised of the opportunity to request a review of the decision. After 10 working days of CI notifying the provider of the decision. If a review is not requested, the complainant (if any) is advised of the decision and the reasons for the decision. The compla...

6. Legal Aid Complaints Management Policy [pdf, 633 KB]

   ...recommended action involves cancellation of a provider’s approval. • A decision is made • any appropriate action is taken • the provider is notified • the complainant is notified, and • the provider is advised of the opportunity to request a review of the decision. After 10 working days of CI notifying the provider of the decision. If a review is not requested, the complainant (if any) is advised of the decision and the reasons for the decision. The compla...

7. Waitangi Tribunal - Part IV Te Urewera [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   ...value of the land to the owners, and the amount of other comparable land retained by them ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 385 (b) Did the Crown give proper consideration to taking other lands instead, or to non-permanent forms of alienation ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 386 (c) Was the national interest sufficient to outweigh the interests of the landowners in retaining their land ? . . . . . . ....

8. Waitangi Tribunal - Part 6 Te Urewera [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   ...value of the land to the owners, and the amount of other comparable land retained by them ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 385 (b) Did the Crown give proper consideration to taking other lands instead, or to non-permanent forms of alienation ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 386 (c) Was the national interest sufficient to outweigh the interests of the landowners in retaining their land ? . . . . . . ....

9. Tucker v Accident Compensation Corporation (Personal Injury and Social Rehabilitation) [2024] NZACC 78 [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...substantial benefit in proceeding with a psychiatric assessment. [28] On 15 March 2020, Ms Tucker provided the Corporation with a selection of historical clinical records which she had obtained from her GP. On 24 March 2020, ACC wrote to Ms Tucker requesting more time to continue investigating the claim. Ms Tucker did not agree to an extension of time. [29] On 31 March 2020, the Corporation issued a decision declining cover for CRPS. The Corporation noted that it had only recent...

10. Goode v CAC 20002 & Ors [2014] NZREADT 64 [pdf, 135 KB]

    ...and his partner eventually purchased the property on 28 November 2011 for $425,000. [4] A summary of the complaint against the licensee in respect of this transaction is as follows: [a] The complainant alleges that the licensee provided false information about an EQC assessment of the property by saying that the EQC had not assessed the property when, in fact, an assessment had taken place on 20 October 2011. The complainant is of the view that the licensee, GLE, and Ms Collier joine...