Search Results

1. U Ltd v DI & SI [2023] NZDT 576 (20 November 2023) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...accordingly her final invoice of $2050.45 was reasonable in line with the requirements of CGA. 18. Accordingly, I order DI and SI to pay the balance of $900.45. Referee: S Malaviya Date: 20 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply...

2. E Ltd v I Ltd [2023] NZDT 430 (31 August 2023) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...required to pay commission of 20% on all the money collected by E Ltd. Therefore, I Ltd is to pay E Ltd the sum of $12,831.33 by the date stated in the order. Referee: K Rendall Date: 31 August 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

3. Cabinet paper - Initial scope of Crown/Māori Relations portfolio [pdf, 462 KB]

   ...however, that excessive land loss (as well as a wide range of Treaty breaches like the loss of autonomy and control of and access to resources) has harmed Māori social, cultural, environmental and economic development. 4. These historical events form the basis of the claims that the Crown and Māori negotiate to settle. Restoration of the Crown/Māori relationship is one of the Crown’s Treaty settlement negotiating principles. The Crown/Māori relationship is, however, broader than ju...

4. [2017] EmpC 154 Sawyer v Victoria University [pdf, 330 KB]

   ...the matter” referring to the record of settlement. She agreed to temporarily restrict or halt preparing for her cases while he found out if negotiations over the record of settlement were possible. [12] Dr Sawyer wrote to Mr Lloyd, at his request, confirming he could speak to Mr Davenport. She said: “What I said did not amount to a consent to anything more than an interim arrangement not to pursue an adversarial process while Greg Lloyd and Geoff Davenport found out whether...

5. [2017] NZEmpC 45 Ports of Auckland Ltd v Findlay [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...pause to note that Mr Gibson disputes having elevated the original complaint to a “death threat”. Nor is his original letter setting out the allegations crafted in this way. [19] I return to the “death threat” allegation below, as it formed a significant part of the case before the Authority and the company’s position in respect of it developed before this Court; and because it is relevant to an assessment of the application on the de novo challenge. [20] The 21 De...

6. LCRO 152/2017 CS v GB (22 May 2018) [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...to comply may result in a finding of unsatisfactory conduct against the lawyer concerned.15 (b) Discussion [54] The question is whether Mr GB was required to provide Mr CS with a letter of engagement, and if so, whether he did? [55] Mr CS claims that Mr GB did not provide him with “procedures for handling complaints” or terms of engagement. Mr GB did not respond to this allegation. The Committee did not consider this issue. [56] As noted above, Mr CS first met with Mr G...

7. Jukes v Accident Compensation Corporation (Personal Injury) [2024] NZACC 175 (4 November 2024) [pdf, 258 KB]

   ...physiotherapy with Ms Tracey Walker, Physiotherapist. Her notes recorded Mr Jukes’ discomfort in his neck, thoracic and lower back, and right ankle. [9] On 13 October 2016, a claim for cover for Mr Jukes was lodged by Ms Walker. Cover was requested for lumbar, ankle and right neck sprains. The date of accident was recorded as 10 October 2016. On 17 October 2016, the Corporation accepted cover. [10] On 9 November 2016, x-rays were taken of Mr Jukes’ neck and lower back....

8. Midlane v Woodberg [2013] NZIACDT 31 (27 May 2013) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...point of contact in New Zealand, which was the company he had engaged. [17] The importance of this instruction was made clear to Ms Anderson. [18] Ms Anderson advised on the appropriate investor category under which Mr A should apply and the information required to prepare and lodge an “Expression of Interest” form. Mr Midlane explained there may be some delay due to Mr A’s commitments. Ms Anderson said the Expression of Interest could be lodged with copies of the relevant documen...

9. Hide v Official Assignee (Discovery) [2018] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...These proceedings will be heard at Christchurch on 30 April 2018. Three days have been set aside. Mr Hide has now applied for further and better discovery. Background [2] The current pleadings filed by Mr Hide comprise an amended statement of claim dated 19 July 2017 and two statements of evidence. Mr Hide alleges that as a consequence of a breach of information privacy principles 1, 2, 4 and 6 there has been an interference with his privacy by the Official Assignee: [2.1] Prin...

10. [2022] NZACC 125 – Williams v ACC (28 June 2022) [pdf, 242 KB]

    ...when he noticed a pull in the heel of his left foot. He says that this made him stop running and return home. ACR 134/21 [3] On 8 May 2020, Mr Williams saw Physiotherapist Andrew Baunton via Telehealth. This consultation resulted in a claim being made for a left foot sprain (“probable plantar fascia strain”). On 26 May 2020, the claim was granted. [4] On 24 July 2020, an X-ray and ultrasound was undertaken by Radiologist, Mr Davies, who concluding “prominent parti...