Search Results

1. Morrison - Te Kaha No.2C Block (2014) 105 Waiariki MB 183 (105 WAR 183) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...hectares, with the balance of 1.62 hectares to be allocated to the balance owners. 1 TN 12233, NZG 120/2664. Te Puni Kōkiri were prepared to release the land from their administration once the owners requested it. Brian Morrison 10.16667 Dardanelle Morehu Tukaki 0.4 Ereti Patuwai 0.66667 Evelyn O’Brien 10.16667 Herbert Leslie Teddy (Life interest) 10 remainder interests 0.4 Kathleen Morrison 10.16667 Leslie Teddy 0.4

2. Queensell-Logan v Accident Compensation Corporation (Interlocutory application for orders for proposed witnesses to attend hearing in person) [2024] NZACC 099 (12 June 2024) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...witnesses are Megan Main, the Chief Executive of the Accident Compensation Corporation, and Jo Hinds Brown, another senior employee of the Corporation, whose role includes housing modifications. [7] Timetable directions were made for the filing of a formal application and affidavit in support and for the respondent’s opposition. [8] The application was to identify the proposed witnesses, the relevance of their proposed evidence, how an affidavit or written brief of evidence would...

3. ABY v ZYF [2013] NZDT 125 (17 September 2013) [pdf, 47 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 125 BETWEEN ABY APPLICANT AND ZYF Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 17 September 2013 Referee: Referee Hannan ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Respondent, ZYF Ltd, pay directly to the Applicant, ABY, the sum of $610.00 on or before 17 August 2011. The Respondent is entitled to retain possession of the Acer computer in question. Facts [1] The Applicant

4. ADI v ZWR Ltd [2011] NZDT 168 (8 April 2011) [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...a 24 hour 7 day Pay and Display car park.” [4] I accept that ADI’s children did not see the signs at the entry/exit displaying the closing time for the car park and that on the basis of the sign they saw at the ticket machine that they formed the view that the car park was open 24/7. [5] ADI’s children had paid for parking until 8:00 am the following day. This was prominently displayed on the parking receipt obtained by ADI’s children. The terms and conditions disp...

5. ACB v ZYC and ZYB [2010] NZDT 77 (9 November 2010) [pdf, 79 KB]

   ...Date of Order: 9 November 2010 Referee: Referee C Smith ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Respondents pay the Applicant the sum of $2,534.37 directly within 21 days of today’s date. The counterclaim is dismissed due to failure of proof. Facts [1] The material facts are that the parties are neighbours. The Applicant, ACB, has brought a claim under the Fencing Act 1978 requesting that the boundary fence between her and the...

6. CEIT practice notes: COVID-19 [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...court of law; • require the applicant or another party to provide documents or other information relating to the application within any reasonable period that the Chair may, from time to time, specify; • make the indicative ruling without the requested documents should they not be supplied within the specified time; • issue directions to accompany the indicative ruling setting the claim down for hearing; or • assign the hearing of the claim to any other member who has not...

7. [2008] NZEmpC AC 14/08 Board of Trustees of Te Kura Kaupapa Motuhake O Tawhiuau v Edmonds [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...reasonable time and opportunity to provide an explanation; • an employer, before making a final decision, may need to make further inquiries to be satisfied of the facts of a matter causing concern; • an employee must be advised of the right to request representation at any stage; • where there is a requirement to advise of any corrective action, there be a reasonable opportunity to amend conduct; • if an allegation is sufficiently serious, an employee may be suspended...

8. X Ltd v GN [2023] NZDT 446 (4 September 2023) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...are not enforceable. 20% compounding monthly penalty interest is usury and $950.00 in costs for a $7.50 debt is unconscionable and unenforceable. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 10. The Tribunal finds that the terms and conditions did not form part of the contract as they were not made known to the Respondent prior to contracting. Even if they had been, the Tribunal would not have enforced such harsh terms. 11. Accordingly, the Tribunal finds that The Respondent only owes t...

9. [2007] NZEmpC CC 13A/07 Abernethy v Dynea NZ Ltd [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...Labour to provide mediation services under the Employment Relations Act 2000; and (b) I hold a current general authority from the Chief Executive to sign, for the purposes of s.149 of the Act, agreed terms of settlement; and (c) I have been requested by the parties to sign the attached agreed terms of settlement; and (d) Before I signed the agreed terms of settlement I explained to them the effect of s.149(3); and (e) I am satisfied that the parties understood the effect of tha...

10. [2020] NZREADT 04 - Singh - Ruling regarding release of file (20 February 2020) [pdf, 166 KB]

    ...could get a copy of your file so that I may augment and/or review our record in view of oral argument on July 23, 2019. Thank you in advance for your assistance. [12] The Tribunal advised counsel for the Committee and Mr Singh of Mr Edmondson’s request. Counsel for the Committee advised that it did not wish to comment on it, and would abide the decision of the Tribunal. Counsel for Mr Singh opposed the request. [13] On 31 July 2019, Mr Edmondson advised the Tribunal that: Th...