Search Results

1. LCRO 174/2017 DN v CI [pdf, 328 KB]

   ...made an error by not obtaining the School’s consent to the assignment of the Cleaning Contract before the conditions in the Agreement were satisfied; (b) did not give him clear information and advice; and (c) by not contacting the Broker to request the return of the deposit Ms CI did not protect his interests. Standards Committee decision [10] The Committee delivered its decision on 16 August 2017 and determined, pursuant to s 138(2) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (t...

2. Otimi v Fa'uhiva - Hauhungaroa 1A3 (2019) 401 Aotea MB 102 (401 AOT 102) [pdf, 382 KB]

   ...announcement of the results at the marae, several submissions from concerned beneficiaries have been filed as to the conduct of the meeting by Court staff. In summary, two specific concerns were raised. First, that there were insufficient voting forms which resulted in hand written forms being used thereby raising questions as to the integrity of the vote. 1 Otimi v Fa'uhiva - Hauhungaroa 1A3 (Poukura Pā) (2018) 394 A...

3. Young v Accident Compensation Corporation (leave to appeal to High Court) [2022] NZACC 248 [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...requirements of paragraph (a) above, this Court will reconsider the latter and come to a concluded view. (c) Should Ms Young not comply with the requirements of paragraph (a) above, this application will stand dismissed. [4] On 10 August 2022, Ms Young requested an extension of time to file her memorandum, and an extension was granted to 6 September 2022. [5] On 2 September 2022, Ms Young filed a statement with the Registry, in which she made the following submissions. In 1995,...

4. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee v Parlane [2010] NZLCDT 26 [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...position, and advised the parties that it anticipated being able to make a decision later that day, and would deliver its decision to the parties, in writing, as soon as it could. The Tribunal retired, and after deliberation made its decision and requested the Chair to deliver the decision in writing to the parties. This is the Tribunal’s decision of 13 September, 2010, now delivered in writing by the Chair pursuant to R.34 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Disciplinary Tribunal) Reg...

5. What happens next

   ...papers’.   ‘On the papers’ means the tribunal will make its decision based on the documents the parties have provided. That means parties don’t attend a hearing. The hearing The tribunal can decide whether or not a case should go to a formal hearing or if it can be heard on the papers. If the tribunal decides your case should have a formal hearing, we’ll contact you to let you know what the next steps will be. At a hearing, the people involved (every party) can attend and be...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Copyright >
   3. File sharing infringements

6. Review of the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004 Post Consultation Decisions [pdf, 993 KB]

   ...foreshore and seabed. 2. This is the second RIS prepared in relation to the Review of the 2004 Act. The first RIS analysed the preliminary policy options for replacing the 2004 Act as one possible outcome of the Review. Its purpose was to inform Ministerial decisions on the Government’s preferred policy option which was set out in a public discussion document. This RIS only briefly addresses the status quo, problem definition and objective of the Review, which were covered in mor...

7. AJE, CDE, and JPS as Trustees of the EE Family Trust v Vero Insurance New Zealand Ltd [2020] CEIT-2020-0009 [pdf, 348 KB]

   ...I accept, was that he was talking to Vero representatives on site before the landslip, that Mr E advised Vero representatives of the overspill, and that Vero agreed to fix the spouting. 10 [46] If as Ms Matheson says all meetings were formalised in writing, then it is surprising that no minutes were taken of the all-important meeting held on site on 18 March 2014 when Mr E’s evidence is that he says Vero agreed there must have been over spilling and agreed to engage GE Co...

8. Paerau v Trustees of Te Komiti 1B2B2 Ahu Whenua Trust (2017) 147 Taitokerau MB 241 (147 TTK 241) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...substantive application (“the rehearing application”). 10 The rehearing application was set down to be heard on 1 December 2016. [10] On 28 November 2016, counsel for Mr Paerau, Mr Tupara, sought an adjournment of the rehearing application. The request for an adjournment was opposed by the trustees. On 29 November 2016, I granted the adjournment and set the rehearing application down for a new hearing date. 11 [11] The rehearing application was then heard on 13 December 2...

9. [2021] NZACC 10 - Monk v ACC (12 January 2021) [pdf, 281 KB]

   ...painter and sand blaster for some twenty-seven years. In this appeal, Mr Monk claims he suffered occupational diseases due to his employment involving exposure to toxic solvents and toxic metals and seeks cover as a result. [2] The injury claim form filed by Dr Wojcik in May 2016 records diagnosis of toxic effects of lead/ lead compounds and petroleum solvents and notes: From 1987 to 2014[Mr Monk] was exposed to a large number of toxic solvents and toxic metals includi...

10. [2025] NZEmpC 215 Scott v Damar Industries Limited [pdf, 248 KB]

    ...consider Ms Scott’s responses and explanations given at the disciplinary meeting. It simply records that the CEO did not consider that there were any mitigating factors or circumstances that justified Ms Scott’s conduct towards NI. Damar then requested that Ms Scott return all company property. [63] Around the time of Ms Scott’s termination, an employee at Damar believed he was subjected to bullying, intimidating and threatening behaviour in the workplace by a colleague. H...