Search Results

1. [2021] NZACC 170 - Keys v ACC (5 November 2021) [pdf, 371 KB]

   ...injury. Background [2] At the relevant time the appellant worked as a process operator at Fonterra, Takanini. She had worked in that role since 1994. [3] On 25 May 2016, the appellant consulted her GP, Dr Adams, who that day lodged a claim on her behalf with the respondent. The claim form noted the accident occurred on 19 May 2016 at 10.00 am while she was operating “micro 3” working on a machine. [4] The doctor recorded she was unable to continue normal work fo...

2. DL v Accident Compensation Corporation (Work Related Mental Injury) [2022] NZACC 178 [pdf, 395 KB]

   ...ACC dated 7 May 2019, the appellant referred to “repeated rape and abuse [her elder son] has suffered at the hands of ACC approved providers” and that she “had to witness daily assaults on [my younger son] from 1993 while ACC accepted his claim”. [8] On 8 October 2004, the appellant was diagnosed with a major depressive episode with the Victoria Clinic notes recording: Disorganised, tearful, and highly distressed. In essence – multiple stressors – last seven years...

3. BORA Prisoners’ and Victims’ Claims (Continuation and Reform) Amendment Bill [pdf, 425 KB]

   Prisoners’ and Victims’ Claims (Continuation and Reform) Amendment Bill 3 December 2012 Attorney-General Prisoners’ and Victims’ Claims (Continuation and Reform) Amendment Bill (PCO 16948/1.7) Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 Our Ref: ATT395/140 1. We have examined the Prisoners’ and Victims’ Claims (Continuation and Reform) Amendment Bill (PCO 16948/1.7) for consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. We have concluded tha...

4. [2012] NZEmpC 124 Allen v C3 Ltd [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...lieu, noting this on his timesheet. Unbeknownst to Mr Allen his immediate manager went to see Mr Payne (the Manager of Stevedoring and General Cargo at Mt Maunganui wharves). Mr Payne instructed the payroll officer to twink out the half hour claimed for, and to disallow the day in lieu request. None of this was discussed with Mr Allen or otherwise communicated to him. Mr Payne accepted that, in hindsight, it may have been preferable to have done so. [11] It became apparent t...

5. Maruera v Te Runanga o Ngati Maru Taranaki Trust [2020] Chief Judge's MB 965 (2020 CJ 965) [pdf, 500 KB]

   ...continuing inability of Ngāti Maru to establish a more permanent representative entity for the iwi. [3] At the last hearing of these matters the chairman of the trust, Mr Jan Matuku, on behalf of himself and the majority of the trustees of the trust requested that I appoint counsel to assist them prosecute an application for the establishment of a whenua tōpu trust as a representative entity for the tribe. [4] I now appoint Nathan Milner, solicitor of Wellington, per sections...

6. Hohepa v Cassidy - Waima C30A and Waima Topu B (2018) 182 Taitokerau MB 166 (182 TTK 166) [pdf, 337 KB]

   ...Sam Lee of Thomson Survey Limited. It shows that Pihema’s 3 30 Whangarei MB 112 (30 WH 112). 4 77 South Island MB 18 (77 SI 18). 5 That application was amended on 14 November 2016 to include a claim for damages. 6 38 Taitokerau MB 132 (38 TTK 132). 182 Taitokerau MB 169 house, along with water tanks, a clothes line, a septic tank and soakage fields, are located almost entirely on C30A. [13] On 19 September 2014, Deputy...

7. Review of the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004 Analysis of Replacement Regimes [pdf, 465 KB]

   ...the 2004 Act will be repealed and replaced by a new regime: Cabinet has not made this decision. It is possible to retain or amend the 2004 Act or repeal it and not replace it; is written with a particular purpose in mind: its purpose is to inform preliminary decisions in order for a preferred option to be taken out for public consultation. This consultation will ask fundamental policy questions (e.g. should customary interests be tested?). A final decision on the preferred option...

8. [2015] NZEmpC 220 Wellington Free Ambulance Service Inc v Austing costs [pdf, 67 KB]

   ...there was only the one set of proceedings and submissions for both defendants, for costs purposes, the case should properly be viewed as one. [4] The defendants had sought interim reinstatement pending an investigation by the Authority into their claim that they had been unjustifiably dismissed from their employment with the plaintiff. The investigation is scheduled to commence on 19 February 2016. In its determination (the Authority had ordered interim reinstatement under "w...

9. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Sensible Sentencing Group Trust [2014] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...information about his convictions for sexual offending the SSGT had no reasonable grounds for believing that any of the exceptions in Principle 11 applied to the disclosure. 3 [5.3] On 5 November 2009 the aggrieved person, by his legal adviser, requested personal information from the SSGT being the court documents held by the SSGT and the identity of the person who provided the documents to the SSGT (Principle 6). A decision on that request was not made within 20 working days aft...

10. File a challenge

    ...written determination issued by the Employment Relations Authority.1 This is also called challenging a determination. You will be called the plaintiff and the person or organisation you are making the claim against will be called the defendant. Note: The information contained in the graphic below is also available in a text only format for those who have difficulty viewing the graphic: Alternative text for File a challenge graphic Form 1: Challenge to determination of the Authority Form 2A:...

    Located in:

    1. Employment Court >
    2. Apply to the Employment Court