Search Results

1. [2016] NZSSAA 030 (20 April 2016) [pdf, 26 KB]

   ...was a greater availability was wrong in law. • A criteria of exceptional circumstances was incorrectly considered in determining the appellant’s application for a food grant. • The Ministry did not adequately investigate the appellant’s claim. • Food grants should include an allowance for non-food items such as toothpaste, toilet paper and dishwashing liquid. [7] Despite the claim that the Ministry’s investigation of the appellant’s request for assistance was inadequ...

2. ST v Council [2022] NZDT 9 (24 March 2022) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...unreasonable. The relative council officer (its arborist) had no reason to suspect at that time that there was a problem with the tree, or since then. Referee: G.P.Rossiter Date: 24 March 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

3. ZY v BT [2023] NZDT 784 (13 December 2023) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...specialising in repairs of this type of vehicle. 11. As I have found that BT caused the collision then he is liable to J Ltd for the cost of repairs of $9003.96. Referee: T Prowse Date: 13 December 2023. Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

4. KM v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 209 (14 February 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...$5,600.00 purchase price that KM paid for the car is the approximate market value of the car, so KM is entitled to recover $5,600.00 in damages for the conversion from N Ltd. Referee: Kaho Date: 14 February 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...

5. U Ltd v DI & SI [2023] NZDT 576 (20 November 2023) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...accordingly her final invoice of $2050.45 was reasonable in line with the requirements of CGA. 18. Accordingly, I order DI and SI to pay the balance of $900.45. Referee: S Malaviya Date: 20 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply...

6. E Ltd v I Ltd [2023] NZDT 430 (31 August 2023) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...required to pay commission of 20% on all the money collected by E Ltd. Therefore, I Ltd is to pay E Ltd the sum of $12,831.33 by the date stated in the order. Referee: K Rendall Date: 31 August 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

7. [2022] NZIACDT 27 - ZK v Li (8 November 2022) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...the residence application on 1 February 2019. [21] Mr Li sent an email to Immigration NZ on 20 March 2019 to advise changes to the complainant’s employment. [22] On 1 August 2019, Mr Li sent an email to the complainant, replying to her request of the same date, stating that he had contacted Immigration NZ but no officer had been assigned. [23] Ms X advised the complainant on 19 August 2019 by email (copied to Mr Li) that the application had been received by Immigration N...

8. Hide v Official Assignee (Discovery) [2018] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...These proceedings will be heard at Christchurch on 30 April 2018. Three days have been set aside. Mr Hide has now applied for further and better discovery. Background [2] The current pleadings filed by Mr Hide comprise an amended statement of claim dated 19 July 2017 and two statements of evidence. Mr Hide alleges that as a consequence of a breach of information privacy principles 1, 2, 4 and 6 there has been an interference with his privacy by the Official Assignee: [2.1] Prin...

9. [2022] NZACC 125 – Williams v ACC (28 June 2022) [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...when he noticed a pull in the heel of his left foot. He says that this made him stop running and return home. ACR 134/21 [3] On 8 May 2020, Mr Williams saw Physiotherapist Andrew Baunton via Telehealth. This consultation resulted in a claim being made for a left foot sprain (“probable plantar fascia strain”). On 26 May 2020, the claim was granted. [4] On 24 July 2020, an X-ray and ultrasound was undertaken by Radiologist, Mr Davies, who concluding “prominent parti...

10. [2012] NZEmpC 202 Cruickshank v CE of Unitec Institute of Technology [pdf, 446 KB]

    ...Unitec really began on 30 June 2009 when John Berridge, General Manager of ATT, emailed Dr Ede, advising him that Mr Berridge and the CEO of the ITO, Ian Elliott, wished to meet confidentially with Dr Ede and Mr Richardson. The purpose of the requested meeting was to both advise Unitec of the ATT’s new initiatives and directions and to discuss the involvement of Unitec in an industry training development that the ITO and ATT proposed. Mr Cruickshank was, deliberately, not inv...