Search Results

1. Sidhu v Tan [2016] NZIACDT 62 (29 September 2016) [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...part, to challenge the way the Registrar has investigated the complaint, and criticise Ms Sidhu. He apparently disputed the facts, but his focus on criticising the Registrar obscured those elements of his response. [11] Accordingly, the Tribunal requested Mr Tan, pursuant to section 49(4)(a), to file an affidavit setting out: [11.1] What he did to comply with the 2010 Code’s requirements for commencing his professional relationship with Ms Sidhu (with specific reference to clauses...

2. [2017] NZEnvC 033 Brownlie Brothers Limited v Far North District Council [pdf, 332 KB]

   ...before it was due to serve its evidence in chief and eight weeks before Brownlie Brothers Ltd was due to serve its evidence, the NRC as the proponent of the scheme advised that it could no longer proceed with the scheme as originally proposed and requested that the hearing be cancelled. It advised that it would surrender the resource consents granted to it and withdraw its notices of requirement. By way of explanation, the NRC stated that the design work for the scheme had been base...

3. [2017] NZEmpC 100 Lyttelton Port Company Ltd v Arthurs [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...Lyttelton Port’s application. [9] On 27 June 2017, Mr Arthurs gave notice to Lyttelton Port that he required disclosure by it of documents identified or described in six numbered paragraphs. The company objected because it considered the requests were too broad, vague, the documents requested did not exist, or what was asked for was not relevant. [10] Lyttelton Port’s objection was supported by an affidavit sworn by its industrial relations manager, Ms Sally Williams. Her...

4. ST v B Ltd [2025] NZDT 193 (20 May 2025) [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...reasonable care and skill? 8. Section 28 of the CGA guarantees that services provided to a consumer must be carried out with reasonable care and skill. B Ltd's workmanship should therefore meet the standard expected of a competent builder performing similar work. 9. ST provided a timeline of issues, summarised as follows: a. 21 June 2022: Washbasin installed on the wrong wall. Rectified on 23 June 2022. No financial loss, but cited as an example of poor project oversight.

5. Brightwell - Estate of Roera Rangi or Rangi Roera or Roera Te Heke-tanga [2019] Chief Judge's MB 1457 [pdf, 607 KB]

   ...Statement of the subdivisions and allocations of land at Taranaki. viii. Copy of Māori Land Court Minute Book Index – Record No. 22351 ix. Copy of Management Structure Details Report for Kaipakopako 4A1B (Muru Raupatu Pa) -and trustee consent forms. x. Copy of Management Structure Details Report for Kaipakopako 2D (Urupa). xi. Copy of 95 Aotea MB 225 dated 16 December 1999 – relating to Kaipakopako 2D (Urupa). xii. Copy of untitled minute book entry relating to success...

6. [2022] NZEmpC 183 Butt v Attorney-General [pdf, 372 KB]

   ...train the carers and be paid to do so. [14] I also accept that the Ministry informed the Butts that it could not bind Access or settle on its behalf. However, it was not disputed that, as funder, the Ministry had substantial power when making requests of Access. [15] After lengthy discussions, the parties caucused. Ms Wilson prepared a draft Record of Settlement which included at cl 1(c): … the Ministry of Health will cover training costs for two weeks for Mrs Sushila B...

7. HM v XD & KT [2023] NZDT 623 (13 November 2023) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...the New Zealand Companion Animals Register (NZACR) be amended to reflect that HM is the owner of E. The applicant also sought $2,000.00 from the respondents and clarified at the Tribunal that this was because she was required to enter a sum into the form, but that E was priceless. HM also clarified that she has relinquished the ownership of B to XD and KT. Therefore, this hearing was solely about E. 3. XD has filed a counterclaim in an amount of $1,999.00 and requested that the Tribuna...

8. [2025] NZEmpC 210 Harte v Midwifery Employee Representation and Advisory Service Inc [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...submissions is to be filed and served by the plaintiff no later than 4 pm Monday, 29 September 2025; the defendant no later than 4 pm Monday, 6 October 2025. The Registrar is to schedule a submissions only hearing via AVL, reflective of counsels’ request that they have the opportunity to address the Court orally on their closing submissions. 2 Faitala v The Pacific Island Business Development Trust [2025] NZEmpC 113. 3 Above n 2. [11] Costs are reserved....

9. [2014] NZEmpC 230 D'Arcy-Smith v Natural Habitats Ltd [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...Blanchard, any other NH staff on site & all First Call Staff for the period 16 th to 20 th Sept 2013. 8 Records for Mr Stevenson, Mr Oertel & Ms Curtis for both landline & cellular from 16 June 2013 till 30 th July 2013. 9 All performance reviews for Mr Stevenson, Mr Oertel & Mr Blanchard from June 2013 till August 2014. 10 Any & all reports Mr Oertel wrote on Mr Blanchard regarding his activities including walking off site & returning to Auckland durin...

10. CX & EB v TK [2023] NZDT 342 (31 May 2023) [pdf, 205 KB]

    ...purlin replacement. What remedy, if any, is available to CX and EB? 16. For the reasons above, no remedy is available to CX and EB and the claim is dismissed. Referee Perfect Date: 31 May 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...