Search Results

Search results for claim form.

11362 items matching your search terms

  1. Legal aid ACC consultation analysis report [pdf, 492 KB]

    ...response and final decisions April 2012 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully exclude...

  2. [2021] NZEmpC 167 UXK v Talent Propeller Ltd [pdf, 379 KB]

    ...referred to the District Court proceeding. [12] On 9 March 2020, UXK filed a memorandum in the Authority asserting, amongst other things, TPL had breached that court’s suppression order by referring to the District Court proceeding. She requested that TPL be directed to file a revised statement of problem. Attached to the memorandum was a redacted version of the front page of the District Court judgment. [13] On 10 March 2020, the Authority acknowledged receipt of U...

  3. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 47 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 1.1 MB]

    T E R Ö P Ü WH A K A M A N A I T E T I R I T I O WA I T A N G I TE MA N U T U K U T U K U T he Tribunal has concluded its inquiry into the Wänanga Mäori Education Funding claim (Wai 718) with a one-day sitting in December, which heard the closing submissions of Te Whare Wänanga o Awanuiarangi, Te Wänanga o Raukawa, Te Wänanga o Aotearoa, and the Crown. The Tribunal granted the claim ur- gency on the basis that there appeared to be ‘grave risks that the wänanga programme...

  4. LCRO 45/2020 MN v RK (22 December 2020) [pdf, 249 KB]

    ...that task. [8] Sale of the property did not proceed smoothly. The parties were unable to agree on a number of issues. [9] Eventually the parties reached agreement that Mr GS would purchase Ms RK’s interest in the property. Mr MN was not informed of this proposal. [10] Mr MN rendered fees in the sum of $9,162.63 (GST inclusive). [11] On 25 January 2019, Ms RK filed a complaint against Mr MN with the Lawyers Complaints Service. [12] On 7 February 2019, Mr MN lodged a caveat ag...

  5. NE & LE v IN & KC & CN [2020 NZDT 1537 (20 July 2020) [pdf, 93 KB]

    ...and CN, jointly and severally, are to pay the sum of $368.75 to NE and LE on or before Monday 3 August 2020. Reasons: 1. On 30 July 2019, NE and LE entered into a sale and purchase agreement to buy the respondents’ house using the standard form ADLS/REINZ Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Real Estate (ninth edition 2012(8)). Settlement was on 8 November 2019. In early December 2019, the purchasers had the heat pump inspected by [Company], which reported that the remote control wa...

  6. KT & TE v B Ltd [2021] NZDT 1650 (12 November 2021) [pdf, 91 KB]

    ...retention in the terms of the contract, which override the statutory provisions (CCLA s 67), so the respondent must refund the full sum of $457.00. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 12 November 2021 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

  7. SB v IK [2024] NZDT 255 (26 March 2024) [pdf, 94 KB]

    ...make a decision on the evidence place before me at the hearing. Did the respondent breach the contract with the applicant when he failed to supply the replacement sensory? 7. The general law of contract applies. A legally binding contract is formed when both parties intend to contract on agreed terms and intend for those terms to be legally binding. The terms of a CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 contract are formed at the beginning, not at the end. What was agreed is looked a...

  8. TE v M Ltd [2023] NZDT 602 (2 November 2023) [pdf, 177 KB]

    ...as to which door lock would be placed upon and her claim must fail. 16. M Ltd has sought payment of the outstanding sum for its final invoice. Beyond the allegations about the lock error, TE has not challenged to the invoice, which is, I am informed, largely for doorstops provided outside of the contract. Therefore, I make orders that this invoice for $649.37 is to be paid. Referee: C D Boys Date: 2 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Informati...

  9. HT Ltd v HW Ltd [2024] NZDT 556 (15 July 2024) [pdf, 172 KB]

    ...$23,162.54. 9. There were no terms and conditions regarding late fees or interest made in the settlement agreement, so the order is limited to the amount of the agreement. Referee: K Rendall Date: 15 July 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply...

  10. ID v SN [2024] NZDT 171 (18 April 2024) [pdf, 215 KB]

    ...crumbling rust. SN said that section of the car was not repaired when the rust work was done by him as it was not deemed to be necessary at the time the repairs were carried out. ID was told that the car would need work to make it a daily car. All this information was available to ID at the time of purchase, and it was open to him to ask more questions if he wished. 20. In relation to the claim that the car was drivable, SN denies saying that the car could be driven from [location 2]...