Search Results

1. [2014] NZEmpC 170 Hagfish NZ Limited v Choi [pdf, 66 KB]

   ...Authority’s investigation of the matter in a manner that was designed to resolve the issues involved. [7] The Authority reported that Hagfish did not facilitate its investigation. It said that despite reminders from the Authority and being requested specifically by an Authority Member to do so, Hagfish failed to file a statement in reply to Mr Choi’s statement of problem. The Authority said that although Mr Coleman had previously communicated with it using an email address wh...

2. WD v HT [2023] NZDT 674 (1 November 2023) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...to be made by HT to put the caravan into the condition he stated it was, without betterment, is 70% of the repair quote, being $4,935.00. Referee: L. Mueller Date: 1 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

3. KI v CT [2023] NZDT 125 (13 June 2023) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...Tribunal orders: CT is ordered to pay KI the sum of $4,473.50. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 30 June 2023. Reasons: 1) In January this year the applicant bought a caravan from the respondent. This was via ‘[online selling platform].’ The price paid was $26,902.00. 2) The advertisement placed by the respondent for the caravan included the following: “It is sold as is with the following comments: Upholstery/cabinetry, carpets are in very good condition- looks m...

4. TG v N Ltd & EX [2024] NZDT 785 (4 November 2024) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...standard because the supermarket does not operate under the RMP. So, it can be sold locally. 9. For the reasons above EX must pay TG $30,000.00. Referee: Ms Gayatri Jaduram Date: 4 November 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...

5. KD v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 315 (16 May 2024) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...that he had not checked in. He pushed a button to confirm “I didn’t stay at the property” and says a text box appeared in which he wrote that he intended to check in the following day, on the 23 January. He submitted that, and expected that information to be made available to D Ltd. 3. D Ltd says it was not provided any notification by [booking website] about KD’s intention to check in and it is agreed by all that KD did not contact D Ltd directly. D Ltd charged the full amo...

6. BN v LG Ltd [2024] NZDT 611 (10 September 2024) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...the delays and it does not make up for the fact that BN got no benefit from the $1,499.00 paid. Therefore, I find that a full refund is appropriate. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 10 September 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

7. DW v H Ltd [2024] NZDT 618 (6 September 2024) [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...[website] had not given that semi-reassurance, I’m sure DW would have thought to contact [accommodation] directly and this situation could have been avoided. Referee: J Perfect Date: 6 September 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

8. CQ Ltd v CE [2024] NZDT 473 (12 June 2024) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...photos, invoices and assessor’s report. I find that that the costs of repair are reasonable and consistent with the damage done and ought to be paid by CE. Referee: LK Whineray Date: 12 June 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

9. Q Ltd v LE [2024] NZDT 827 (14 October 2024) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...However, I find that LE is liable to pay the first invoice of $208.28, as the tap was fitted properly, and the fault was not related to the Q Ltd work. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 14 October 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

10. SH v B Ltd [2025] NZDT 91 (1 May 2025) [pdf, 165 KB]

    ...insurance. The applicant has provided evidence to the respondent and the Tribunal proving his loss and I order it paid. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Hannan DTR Disputes Tribunal Referee 01 May 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply...