11135 items matching your search terms
...to a refund of the ‘filing fee’. 21. For these reasons the claim by JX against SB is proved. 22. For these reasons SB is to pay JX $455.00. Referee: K Johnson Date: 06 June 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...
...in a manner similar to appeals in the High Court. Both appellant and respondents were represented by counsel. The respondents attempted to seek further clarification on points on appeal and although documentation was filed in response to that request that did not lessen the number of points to be answered nor the scope of matters to be considered on appeal. [10] We are also concerned that one of the major planks of the appellant’s case, that being an assessment of support or oth...
...and Service Coordinator (NASC), the Accident Compensation Corporation, the Police and the Psychologists Board. [9] Yet Mr Marshall consistently refused to engage with IDEA Services regarding his complaints despite a multiplicity of apologies and requests to meet with him to address and resolve the issues in dispute. See the HDCA decision at [32]. [10] In that decision the Tribunal at [54] found that without exception, the apologies tendered by IDEA Services were genuine: [54] In the...
...those provisions apply in this Court. Regulation 6 provides that: 6 Procedure (1) Every matter that comes before the court must be disposed of as nearly as may be in accordance with these regulations. (2) If any case arises for which no form of procedure has been provided by the Act or these regulations …, the court must, subject to section 212(2) of the Act, dispose of the case— (a) as nearly as may be practicable in accordance with— (i) … (ii) the provisions of...
...the matter was appealed to the Māori Appellate Court and subsequently dismissed by that Court in 2013.2 The application then returned before me to address the remaining matters. I issued orders for the production of all relevant financial information from the bank and accountants regarding the Oamaru Bay Holiday Park, followed by discovery orders against the respondents.3 [3] On 25 June 2015, the Court engaged Jefferies Nock & Associates, chartered accountants, to carry out...
...Waka Ama Championships were held at Rotorua. Mr Taiapa’s domestic partner, Cath Deacon, sought the defendant’s approval to Mr Taiapa taking five days’ leave from Monday 28 March to Friday 1 April 2011. The reason for the lateness of this request (made two working days before the start of the leave requested) was said by Ms Deacon to have been because CYFS had required Mr Taiapa and Ms Deacon to take a week’s leave before the end of March 2011 from running their CYFS home....
...overcharged. [41] With specific reference to Mr Hakaoro’s statement in response to the complaint: [41.1] Mr Hakaoro claimed he could not have known of the complaint with the Ombudsmen, and had no reason to inquire. That was wrong, as he should have requested the disclosure of the file from Immigration New Zealand. The electronic file that was readily available would have been “flagged” with the status due to the pending Ombudsmen’s complaint. [41.2] Mr Hakaoro was required to...
...This raised issues for the company from an operational perspective. Mr Ward’s mental health had, by this stage, begun to suffer. His health impacted on his work, including his ability to concentrate and be in charge of heavy equipment. A performance review dated 12 March 2016 notes: ACHIEVEMENTS FOR THE YEAR: NONE 1 Ward v Concrete Structures (NZ) Ltd [2018] NZERA Auckland 350 (Member Trotman). AREAS WHERE IMPROVEMENT IS REQUIRED: NEEDS TO GET ON TOP OF HEALTH I...
...considered average in the Employment Court. Category 3 concerns proceedings that, because of their complexity or significance, require a representative to have special skill or experience in the Employment Court. [22] I note that the Court was not requested to fix cost classifications at any pre- hearing stage. 15 Victoria University of Wellington v Alton-Lee [2001] ERNZ 305 (CA) at [48]. 16 “Employment Court of New Zealand Practice Directions” <www.employmentcourt.govt.n...
...suite because the items came together initially as one suite, that is, the same contract. Conclusion 16. For the reasons above, BH Ltd must pay LO $2,700.00. Referee: Ms G Jaduram Date: 5 August 2019 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to ap...