Search Results

1. KD v D Ltd [2024] NZDT 315 (16 May 2024) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...that he had not checked in. He pushed a button to confirm “I didn’t stay at the property” and says a text box appeared in which he wrote that he intended to check in the following day, on the 23 January. He submitted that, and expected that information to be made available to D Ltd. 3. D Ltd says it was not provided any notification by [booking website] about KD’s intention to check in and it is agreed by all that KD did not contact D Ltd directly. D Ltd charged the full amo...

2. BN v LG Ltd [2024] NZDT 611 (10 September 2024) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...the delays and it does not make up for the fact that BN got no benefit from the $1,499.00 paid. Therefore, I find that a full refund is appropriate. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 10 September 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

3. DW v H Ltd [2024] NZDT 618 (6 September 2024) [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...[website] had not given that semi-reassurance, I’m sure DW would have thought to contact [accommodation] directly and this situation could have been avoided. Referee: J Perfect Date: 6 September 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

4. CQ Ltd v CE [2024] NZDT 473 (12 June 2024) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...photos, invoices and assessor’s report. I find that that the costs of repair are reasonable and consistent with the damage done and ought to be paid by CE. Referee: LK Whineray Date: 12 June 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

5. SH v B Ltd [2025] NZDT 91 (1 May 2025) [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...insurance. The applicant has provided evidence to the respondent and the Tribunal proving his loss and I order it paid. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Hannan DTR Disputes Tribunal Referee 01 May 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply...

6. Q Ltd v LE [2024] NZDT 827 (14 October 2024) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...However, I find that LE is liable to pay the first invoice of $208.28, as the tap was fitted properly, and the fault was not related to the Q Ltd work. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 14 October 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

7. MacDonald v MacDonald - Wairau Block XII Section 6C 2C (2021) 69 Te Waipounamu MB 251 (69 TWP 251) [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...exclusion of the other is beyond the existing right of ownership and would require the creation of new rights, which is beyond the jurisdiction of s 18(1)(a). [37] Therefore, I decline to make the order sought under s 18(1)(a) as what is being requested is beyond the jurisdiction of the Court. [38] There is an existing jurisdiction for the Court to allow occupation of land to the exclusion of others in the form of an occupation order under s 328 of the Act. This appears to be more...

8. LCRO 38/2025 XYZ Inc. v VNR and QBL (30 July 2025) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...[16] The two complaints were referred to the Committee for consideration. What did the Committee decide? [17] The Committee gave initial consideration to the complaints under s 137(1) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act). It formed the view that the issues to consider were whether the respondents had: (a) used a legal process for the purpose of causing unnecessary embarrassment, distress or inconvenience to another person’s reputation, interests, or occupation;2

9. [2010] NZEmpC 150 Williams v Chesterton Group Ltd (In Liquidation) [pdf, 35 KB]

   ...that it was “coming”. One of the reasons for her request was that it appeared to her that she was being paid in cash without reference to a pay slip or other time records and there were no references to holiday pay or sick leave. Repeated requests for an employment agreement were met with the same response that it was “coming”. Eventually, in March 2009, Ms Williams joined the Service and Food Workers Union Nga Ringa Tota Inc and met with an organiser, Lynette Slade....

10. Muneez v Deng [2013] NZIACDT 33 (27 May 2013) [pdf, 108 KB]

    ...these issues and the need for further documentation. The decline letter observed: “We confirm that we have not received any response from you/your Immigration advisor ...” [18] Even earlier, Immigration New Zealand had sent Ms Deng an email requesting information. This request was dated 15 February 2011 and it too had no response. [19] Mr Muneez’s complaint is that: [19.1] Ms Deng was tardy in informing Mr Muneez that Immigration New Zealand had declined his application. Ms...