Search Results

1. [2021] NZACC 122 - Nelson v ACC (3 August 2021) [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...pelvic discomfort, and tests showed decreased compliance and possible detrusor overactivity at end fill. [47] On 9 May 2017, Dr Sarwar noted Mr Nelson’s report of erectile dysfunction, and his request for a neurology referral. Dr Sarwar also requested the Corporation to assess Mr Nelson for podiatry, to improve his pelvic instability which resulted from 10 his injuries. She reported that he had numerous symptoms including a foot drop and nerve damage to his legs as a resu...

2. [2023] NZEnvC 148 Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga [pdf, 338 KB]

   ...High Court.2 Poutama also referred to a potential application for judicial review in relation to its first ground of appeal in this proceeding,3 which it considered should be determined prior to a hearing of this proceeding. Additionally, Poutama requested that service be directed upon the New Zealand Māori Council in accordance with s 18 of the Māori Community Development Act 1962. The Court accepted that the works proposed to be undertaken are urgent repair works. The Court...

3. [2007] NZEmpC AC 10A/07 Harvey White (formerly X) v Auckland DHB [pdf, 57 KB]

   HARVEY DOUGLAS WHITE (FORMERLY "X") V AUCKLAND DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD AK AC 10A/07 [15 October 2007] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 10A/07 ARC 52/05 IN THE MATTER OF personal grievances removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN HARVEY DOUGLAS WHITE (FORMERLY "X") Plaintiff AND AUCKLAND DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on

4. [2009] NZEmpC AC 28/09 Filta Vacuum Products Ltd v Dolan [pdf, 43 KB]

   ...of between $8,000 and $20,000. [30] Mr Harrison analysed the progress of the case and alleged the plaintiff had intentionally set out to increase costs for the defendant. He relied on the Authority’s findings concerning the view Mr Black formed as to the defendant being guilty of fraud and pursuing this conclusion without giving proper attention to the defendant’s responses. He submitted this was recognised by the Authority’s substantial award of compensation to the defe...

5. Zagorski v Wilkinson Building and Construction Limited [2012] NZWHT Auckland 47 [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...readings was lacking substantial merit or made in bad faith. The application was made in the context of an upcoming experts’ conference on remedial scope. Although extensive testing and moisture readings had been carried out already, the request to take updated readings falls short of the standard set by s 91. Application to strike out Mr Angell’s report [23] Some three months after the final determination on liability was issued, Hitex/Mr Holyoake made an applicat...

6. [2020] NZIACDT 14 - Singh v Ryan - Sanctions (27 February 2020) [pdf, 123 KB]

   ...Ryan’s wrongdoing. Mr Singh his claimed $147,500, of which some items are in the nature of refunds and are considered above. I have already observed that the arithmetic is inaccurate. Few of the items are supported by documentary evidence, as requested by the Tribunal, and many of the figures in those documents do not correspond with the figures used by Mr Singh in his claim.9 [48] One of the items claimed is for the repayments in salary said to have been made to Mr Ryan. Acco...

7. Civil enforcement fees

   ...judgment order has more than one debtor, the creditor must file an application form and pay fees for each debtor individually. Creditors and Debtors applying for civil enforcement must pay the fees at the time of application. What fees/costs can I claim? For more information on what costs can be claimed, please refer to the forms available on: Civil enforcement forms. File and Pay Civil Enforcement fees can be paid through the File and Pay service. You will find them under the Civil Distr...

   Located in:

   1. Fines & payments >
   2. About civil debt

8. Adlam v Savage - Lot 39 A Sec. 2A Parish of Matatā and Lot 39 A Sec. 2B No.2B No.2A Parish of Matatā [2015] Māori Appellate Court MB 59 (2015 APPEAL 59) [pdf, 342 KB]

   2015 Māori Appellate Court MB 59 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIĀRIKI DISTRICT A20140005924 APPEAL 2014/1 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal against orders of the Māori Land Court made on 17 April 2014 at 95 Waiariki MB 176-229 in relation to Lot 39A Sec. 2A Parish of Matatā and Lot 39A Sec. 2B No. 2B No. 2A Parish of Matatā blocks BETWEEN RAE BEVERLY ADLAM Appellant AND H

9. Khan v Accident Compensation Corporation (Personal Injury) [2022] NZACC 225 [pdf, 330 KB]

   ...25 Accident Compensation Act 2001] ____________________________________________________________________ [1] At issue on this appeal is ACC’s letter of 10 June 2019 in which the Corporation said that it was unable to approve the appellant’s request for a driving assessment and home help. The decision noted that cover for pain in lumbar spine “has now been revoked”. [2] The decision letter went on to say: The medical reports and scans available do not support your incapacit...

10. Triennial-Legal-Aid-Discussion-document [pdf, 489 KB]

    ...aid cases granted in the 2024 calendar year. Ethnicity and gender data is based on data recorded in legal aid cases granted in the 2017 calendar year. This is because ethnicity and gender information are no longer collected on legal aid application forms, so more recent data is not available. The civil data in the tables above exclude Waitangi Tribunal legal aid grants. 7 In 2022, the New Zealand Law Society’s Access to Justice report noted that Māori, Pacific, women, and low...