Search Results

1. O'Rorke v Hohaia - Pukekohatu (2006) 173 Aotea MB 114 (173 AOT 114) [pdf, 599 KB]

   ...resolution. He recorded that the purpose of adjourning the applications to Chambers was to enable the Court to summarise for the benefit of the owners what had preceded the "agreement" of 9 December 2002. That agreement provided for the formalising of areas of occupation rather than partition whereby a waahi tapu on the area occupied by the applicant would not be identified on a plan, but Mr O'Rorke would take steps to protect the site. The judge further recorded that (...

2. Wall v Karaitiana - Tauhara Middle 15 Trust (2007) 85 Taupo MB 225 (85 TPO 225) [pdf, 370 KB]

   ...purchase of ancestral lands of the beneficiaries Hom Landcorp Fanning Limited; The loan to be secured by the mOltgage is able to be repaid Hom existing income; Mr Karaitiana has been advised in wn·ting ofthe decision of the owners and trustees and requested to execute mOltgage documents but has refused; The execution olthe mortgage and release ofloan funds is urgently required in order to fulfil the Trust's undertaking to HHLT and HHLT's obligations to Landcorp; The remova...

3. Redruth v Dereham LCRO 154 / 2010 (10 November 2010) [pdf, 132 KB]

   ...by either of the lawyers acting for him or his former partner. The Applicant sought legal advice as to its enforceability. [3] In January 2008 an opinion obtained from WH provided an overall scoping of the legal landscape concerning potential claims. [4] In late March 2008 a further opinion was sought from Mr H; he considered potential liability against three lawyers who had been involved with the Agreement. The potential 2 liability of F was discussed only in the conte...

4. [2021] NZEmpC 120 Lye v ISO Ltd [pdf, 285 KB]

   ...Maritime Union of New Zealand Inc (MUNZ), were and are bargaining for a collective agreement. [21] It was common ground that, if MUNZ and ISO had succeeded in reaching agreement, the resulting collective agreement would have covered the work performed by Mr Lye and, consequently, resolved this proceeding. The proceeding was adjourned to provide an opportunity for the bargaining to continue.20 [22] Unfortunately, no agreement was reached. ISO and MUNZ have not entered into a...

5. OIA-109631.pdf [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   Justice Centre I 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 I Wellington T 04 918 8800 I F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz I www.justice.govt.nz 8 April 2024 S9(2)(a) S9(2)(a) Ref: OIA 109631 Official Information Act request: Correspondence relating to section 27 reports. Thank you for your email of 9 February 2024, to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) requesting, under the Official Information Ac11982 (the Act), documents regarding section 27 reports. Specifically, you requested...

6. McKinney v Cassidy [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...Mr Mark Miller, a building inspector and consultant, called by the Council; • Mr Greg Cassidy, the first respondent. 1.7 A brief of evidence was filed by Mr Clint Smith, a building consultant called by the Council. Whilst Mr Smith did not formally give his evidence on oath (due to an oversight of mine) he participated in the experts’ conferences and made useful comments on quantum with the consent of all parties present. 1.8 In the morning on the first day of the hearing...

7. Audit Summary Report 2016-2017 [pdf, 433 KB]

   ...parties, Police, Crown, Court and Ministry often led to a good outcome for the client and securing additional funding where appropriate. “These letters were unusually helpful and comprehensive and were on each file. This resulted in there being no requests by Legal Services being necessary to obtain further information or clarification.” 6 Acceptable results Audits rated acceptable sometimes had incomplete or patchy client care documentation or no final reporting letters o...

8. Waitangi Tribunal - Te Paparahi o Te Raki - statement of issues for stage 2 [pdf, 595 KB]

   ...this impact on the ability of Te Raki Māori to exercise their tino rangatiratanga? e. In what ways has the Crown asserted their kāwanatanga over Te Raki Māori and what was the response of Te Raki Māori to this? f. What was the nature of any forms of autonomy sought by Te Raki Māori, such as within rūnanga or movements such as Kotahitanga? g. How did the Crown engage with any such proposals or entities? By what other means did Te Raki Māori attempt to engage politically with th...

9. [2019] NZEnvC 184 Ngati Whatua Orakei Whai Maia Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 25 MB]

   ...the Principal Environment Judge directed that the application for declarations be adjourned, and the preliminary question proceed to hearing. Counsel were directed to endeavour to agree questions for determination and a factual matrix as a platform. The question before the Court [9] The parties agreed the following question: Does the Environment Court.3 have jurisdiction to determine whether any tribe holds primary mana whenua over an area the subject of a resource consent applica...

10. [2013] NZEmpC 240 Fox v Hereworth School Trust Board Second Interlocutory [pdf, 212 KB]

    ...against three named Hereworth staff and the mandatory reporting of the plaintiff’s dismissal under the Education Act. Ms Lee’s evidence is that all of this has previously been provided to Mrs Fox pursuant to an Official Information Act 1982 request by the plaintiff to the New Zealand Teachers Council. [25] Mrs Fox’s response concedes that although she has had some documentation from the New Zealand Teachers Council pursuant to an Official Information Act request, she does n...