Search Results

1. [2015] NZEmpC 157 Labour Inspector v Cypress Villas Ltd full court [pdf, 515 KB]

   ...her minimum holiday pay requirements. It required CVL to pay these sums to the Labour Inspector for the use of Ms Northcroft, together with ongoing interest, but the Authority declined to award a penalty against CVL as the Labour Inspector had requested. [17] At the same investigation meeting, the Authority then turned its attention to the Labour Inspector’s application for authorisation to bring a s 234 proceeding against Mr Brill. The Authority was satisfied that, pursuant to...

2. Waitangi Tribunal - He Whiritaunoka (Whanganui) chapter 28 [pdf, 857 KB]

   1457 Chapter 28 Findings and Recommendations 28.1 Introduction here, we set out in digest form the tribunal’s findings and recommendations, with rele­ vant Crown concessions. We reproduce our findings here in summary form for ease of reference. Not all chapters had findings. For some, there are findings but no recommendations. This depends on the subject matter. We make no findings or recommendations about events before 1840. We make findings but no specific recommendations about nine...

3. LLC v ICQ [2012] NZIACDT 10 (28 March 2012) [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...the papers before the Tribunal. [17] The written agreement accurately identified the difficulties with a section 35A application. It is unsurprising that Ms ICQ would have a further oral discussion regarding the difficulties Ms LLC faced, as she claims. The record is not consistent with an adviser who was acting in ignorance, under a mistake, or misleading her client. [18] Ms LLC’s assertion that she was not informed finds no support in the contemporaneous record. [19] The fee cha...

4. [2015] NZEmpC 77 Adams t/a Untouchable hair & Skin v Brown [pdf, 281 KB]

   ...do so, and that she had also booked in another client for insufficient time. Mr Adams understood Ms X had questioned Ms Brown as to why this had occurred. [36] He said that he then asked Ms Brown whether she had called the client as requested; her response was that she had attempted to do so four or five times. However he said that a check of the outward calls on the salon phone did not support Ms Brown’s assertion. He also telephoned the client who confirmed he had not...

5. Insley v Butler - Awanui Haparapara no 2B no 1B sec 2 (2022) 227 Waiariki MB 35 (227 WAR 35) [pdf, 404 KB]

   ...which likely increased as each repayment was made and the outstanding amount of the BMA loan reduced. [40] It was submitted that the subsequent agreement flowing from the owners meeting in 1954 had the effect of affirming the equitable trust formed in 1945, whereby the curtilage remained exclusive to the Butlers. It also provided that the other owners relinquished any ownership of the house in favour of the Butlers, subject only to the condition that the Butlers repay the BMA loa...

6. [2018] NZEnvC 220 Middleton Family Trust v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 4.1 MB]

   ...Tucker Beach Road, Hansen Road and State Highway 6 via the fourth leg of the Hawthorne Drive roundabout 3 The Trust's proposed plan submission and related appeal [5] The Trust's Proposed Plan submission' explains that part of its requested relief pertains to three blocks of land shown on an attached map labelled Attachment A ('the Site'): (a) its own land, highlighted yellow on the map;2 (b) land owned by Walter John Rutherford , William Thomas Cooney...

7. [2018] NZEmpC 128 Blue Water Hotel Ltd v VBS [pdf, 435 KB]

   ...1 VBS v FCL [2018] NZERA Wellington 8 at [42]. 2 At [60]. Key provisions [7] Part 9 of the Act contains the provisions relating to the raising of a personal grievance which an employee may have against his or her employer or former employer. The key sections within that part are now set out. [8] Section 102 is the anchor provision, allowing an employee to pursue a grievance. It states: 102 Employee may pursue personal grievance under this Act An employee

8. Start New Zealand court proceedings against a person in Australia

   ...issues, such as divorce or the enforcement of spousal maintenance or child support court proceedings against property rather than a person (these are called actions in rem). Step 1: Follow the New Zealand process for the proceeding You should fill in the forms and file the documents with the New Zealand court by following the normal process for a New Zealand proceeding. For example, if you want to start a general proceeding, you should follow the process for general proceedings. You also have...

   Located in:

   1. Courts >
   2. Civil >
   3. Disputes with someone in Australia

9. Big Hill Station Ltd v Hemana - Awarua o Hinemanu Trust (2015) 43 Takitimu MB 218 (43 TKT 218 ) [pdf, 328 KB]

   ...receipt of a joint memorandum further timetabling directions were issued on 18 January 2012 for the filing of evidence and submissions with a view to a hearing being held in or around April or May 2012. [19] On 14 March 2012 counsel for the trust requested an extension for the filing of evidence and it was agreed that BHS would file their evidence a month later. BHS asked the Court to amend its timetabling directions accordingly. Then on 30 April 2012, following my assignment to...

10. Chittock v ACC [2014] NZACA 4 [pdf, 157 KB]

    ...November 1983 and has cover under the Accident Compensation Act 1982. The appeal concerns ACC’s decision of 9 May 2007 by which it accepted that Mr Chittock remained entitled to receive entitlements under s 80(3) of the 1982 Act, but declined his request for backdated and ongoing payments under s 80(3), to be paid from 11 September 1995. [2] I regret the delay in issuing this decision, but I have had an inordinate amount of difficulty obtaining evidence to enable me to determine the...