Search Results

1. LCRO 168/2017 AH v OS and VI (21 December 2018) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...the firm about Mr OS. [15] He stated because the firm had favoured Mr T, it would not be possible for the firm to act on the administration of Mrs C’s estate, or accept appointment as executors and trustees. Mrs C’s will [16] Mr AH claimed that Mrs C, without saying “why”, told him she “wanted to see” the lawyer who “handled her will”, and requested Mr AH to ask that lawyer to contact her. He stated that on 3 November 2016, he and Mrs HR telephoned Mr OS to ma...

2. [2010] NZEmpC 32 Maritime Union of NZ v Ports of Auckland [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...employees, a number of them will be converted to full time “permanent” employees. The purpose of this provision is to ensure that where the company has sufficient work for more full time permanent employees, it does not continue to have that performed by part time employees. [22] The final category of employees whose employment is covered in Schedule 8 to the collective agreement, are casuals for whom each period of engagement in work is a separate employment albei...

3. S B v Atia [2018] NZIACDT 4 (19 February 2018) [pdf, 310 KB]

   ...her health. She sought not to disclose that part of the information to the complainant. Procedure [34] The Tribunal hears complaints on the papers under s 49 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act), but may in its discretion request information or request that persons appear before the Authority. [35] In this case the parties did not seek an oral hearing. 12 Discussion The standard of proof [36] The Tribunal determines facts on the balance of pro...

4. OIA-101731.pdf [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...Lawyer Instructions ............................................................................. .....17 Appendix 4: Performance Monitoring Process ............................................................. ... .19 2. Appendix Two: Duty Lawyer Claim Form. ................................................... ...........21 3. Appendix Three: Concerns Raised By Design Partners. .................... ... .. ...........23 3.1 Remuneration.......................................................

5. To-Report-or-Not-to-Report_Report.pdf [pdf, 838 KB]

   To Report or Not to Report? Understanding the impacts of reporting decisions for family and sexual violence in Aotearoa New Zealand Dr Jacinta Cording1, Dr Apriel Jolliffe Simpson2,3 & Professor Devon Polaschek2,3 1Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha | University of Canterbury 2Te Puna Haumaru New Zealand Institute for Security and Crime Science 3Te Whare Wānanga o Waikato | The University of Waikato 2 Ackn

6. Ngati Porou Deed to Amend the Deed of Agreement 9 Aug 2017 [pdf, 8.8 MB]

   ...31 October 2008 Deed of Agreement on the relationship of- nga hapO o Ngat i -Porou with the environment in the territorial customary rights area. In addition, nga hapu-o-Ngati Porou- wi-ll have the -right to approve, or withhold approval for, any request by a person in response to a regional-eouoci I invitation- under the Resource Management-Aet-4-991 to change a-regional coastal plan to establish an aquaculture management area in a-territorial customafy rights-afea-(permission-right; pa...

7. Form 45 Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 584 KB]

   Templates V12 – August 2017 page 1 08/17 form 45 Amendment to Grant Civil Legal Aid Fixed Fee/Fixed Fee Plus Employment (Employment Relations Authority) Legal aid file no. Lead provider’s ref. Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Applicable fee schedule(s) Amendment sought: To replace fixed fee (start at A below) For additional work required when fixed fee has already been claimed (start at A below)...

8. [2020] NZEmpC 182 FVB v XEY [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...for defendant T Oldfield, counsel for intervener Judgment: 5 November 2020 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE J HOLDEN [1] In November 2019 the defendant lodged a claim with the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority). The defendant claims they were sexually harassed by the plaintiff, who is their colleague. Their claim in the Authority is a personal grievance against their employer, the intervener, and seeks various remedies against it. They also seek a penalty again...

9. FQQ Ltd v TJ [2017] NZDT 1044 (11 April 2017) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...because he knew Mr YN had no money. Mr TJ, in giving an example, said he had noticed that when Mr YN first started he had not had any lunch to eat, because he said he had no money. Mr TJ also said he had given Mr YN an advance on his wages in the form of groceries in his first fortnight. (f) Mr QF of FQF gave evidence that when he approached Mr YN, after Mr QF had discussed the invoices with Mr TJ, Mr YN assured him that he accepted the invoices were his, and that he had paid...

10. [2019] NZEmpC 189 McCook v Chief Executive of the Inland Revenue Department [pdf, 217 KB]

    ...application. [7] Mr Cranney, counsel for the plaintiffs, submitted in summary: a) The plaintiffs’ case is that the real employer is IR; Madison’s only role was to send persons that were recruited to IR, to pay them as directed by IR, and to perform certain other limited functions as IR’s agent. b) There is a clear and appropriate procedure by which IR could advance its position that Madison is the employer, and not it; that would occur by IR issuing third party proceedings...