Search Results

1. [2022] NZEmpC 48 E Tu Inc v Mount Cook Airline Ltd [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...particular day as a guaranteed day off; 1 E Tū Incorporated v Mount Cook Airline Ltd 3053012, 30 August 2019 (Minute of Member van Keulen). (b) bid for duties to be rostered, or for days off, using a bid system where 90 per cent of requests are granted; (c) make ad hoc requests for a specific day or days free of duty which are granted wherever possible; (d) swap duties with another employee; and (e) request annual leave dates using a leave ballot system. [10]...

2. LCRO 8/2014 HTO v AG [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...any unfortunate misunderstanding if HTO had taken the fax as a threat, expressed the hope resolution of the matter could be achieved “amicably through clearer communication and cooperation”, and invited further discussion. [12] HTO replied requesting payment of $3,920 by 13 February 2012. Mr AG did not pay. Complaint [13] In July 2013, Ms J laid a complaint on behalf of HTO alleging Mr AG had contravened r 2.7 of the Rules by making a threat for an improper purpose. In he...

3. LCRO 105/2018 SW v NL (23 August 2019) [pdf, 292 KB]

   ...basis the bank loan was “discharged” on the sale of the property. Mr NL proposed a payment of $140,000 without mentioning the bank loan. [12] On [date] 2017 Mr NL informed the bank that Mr RA, for whom he acted, had sold the property. Mr NL requested a release of the bank’s mortgage over the property. He stated that until resolution of the relationship property differences the mortgage over the company’s property would “remain”. [13] On [date] 2017 Ms SW’s lawye...

4. [2011] NZEmpC 84 NZ Air Line Pilots Assn Inc v Air Nelson Ltd [pdf, 67 KB]

   ...(Air Nelson) satisfying the requirement in the collective agreement for it to provide its pilots with two days off on a weekend in every 28 day roster. Air Nelson had attempted to satisfy that requirement by using a Saturday, when a pilot had requested that day as an alternative day for the purposes of the Holidays Act 2003, plus the Sunday of the following additional two days off, which it was also required to provide by the collective agreement. [2] At the conclusion of the jud...

5. ZT v I Ltd [2025] NZDT 42 (26 February 2025) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...liability to him. [10] Thus, ZT has proved that I Ltd was not entitled to deduct the sum of $200.00 from him as it did, and his claim is allowed. Referee: C Hawes Date: 26 February 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

6. HNL v SEC [2013] NZIACDT 11 (19 March 2013) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...There is an email dated 9 March 2011 which Mr SEC sent to Mr HNL. This preceded their meeting. It contains the representation: “My success rate for new applicants applying under any category is 100%” [41] The Minute observed that whether the claim was correct or not, and it was only likely to be accurate if Mr SEC had dealt with a small number of cases, it created a gravely misleading impression. Immigration applications are never certain and clients are entitled to measured prof...

7. [2022] NZACC 112-Dixon v Accident Compensation Corporation (14 June 2022) [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 3 June 2022 Held at: Auckland/Tāmaki Makaurau BY AVL Appearances: J Pietras for the Appellant F Becroft for the respondent Judgment: 14 June 2022 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Claim for personal injury - ss 25-26, and suspension of entitlements – s 107, Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 14 May 2021. The Reviewer dismissed an applicatio...

8. [2023] NZEmpC 136 Wiles v The Vice-Chancellor of the University of Auckland [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...and providing public commentary”, dated from the date that is five years prior to the date that the scope of the claim ends, being 24 August 2017. [5] The University objected to disclosure of the documents sought on the grounds that the information is irrelevant to the proceedings; disclosure of the documents would be injurious to the public interest; and that some of the documents are subject to legal professional privilege. [6] That led to Associate Professor Wiles challen...

9. Z v D LCRO 4 / 2008 (23 April 2009) [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...The Auckland Standards Committee 2 provided its file to this office. Lawyer D was informed of the application and given an opportunity to respond on 8 December 2008. The files and time cost records in respect of the two invoices in issue were requested from Lawyer D. Lawyer D provided to this office not only the files in respect of the invoices in issue, but also numerous other files which he considered were relevant, as well as copious electronic documents both in relation to the...

10. [2020] NZIACDT 51 - NMS v Mercardo (3 December 2020) [pdf, 261 KB]

    ...further documents. She states that she would not have hired a lawyer if Horizons had done its job properly. Too much trust had ruined the family’s future in New Zealand. Additional documents were also sent on 2 November 2020. [29] Following a request from the Tribunal, further documents were sent by the complainant on 18 November 2020. She also sent a note (dated 17 November 2020) responding to Mr Laurent’s email of 10 November 2020 to the Tribunal. She repeats her conten...