LCRO 16/2020 PF v VJ (22 September 2020) [pdf, 243 KB]
...therefore “incumbent on” Mr VJ to advise any “change of position”. [72] In Ms FB’s view, because Mr PF’s absence from the conference was a “minor matter”, the notice of breach was unnecessary. Instead, Ms FB said DEF could have requested payment of its expenses incurred for Mr PF to attend the conference. [73] Ms FB said any notice of termination would be contested, the dispute resolution provisions in clause 81.1 of the franchise agreement invoked, and costs soug...