Search Results

1. Murray v Parker - Paihia 3B9B Residue [2018] Chief Judges MB 707 (2018 CJ 707) [pdf, 346 KB]

   ...determine the status of the land to be Maori freehold land (and providing further protection upon registration of the instrument of title with LINZ) A current search of Land Information New Zealand shows no current certificate of title exists. A request for a new certificate of title is to be sought from Land Information New Zealand. 8. At 28 Kaitaia MB 24 (24 March 2009) the Court determined the status of the Paihia block to be Māori freehold land. 9. On 17 August 2009 Land Inf...

2. LCRO 71/2016 ZB v YA (23 August 2018) [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...incorporated on 10 April 2015 (the company). [3] The company rented a residential property (the property) from another company (the landlord), of which Mr ZB was a director. [4] Mr and Mrs WD are specified as the occupiers on the application form, which also bore the name of the company with Mr YA as its director, as applicants. Mr YA appears to have signed the application form, although there seem to be differences between the handwriting that suggest the form was completed by...

3. TZ & AS v TQ [2024] NZDT 220 (8 March 2024) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...if no time was set a reasonable time? c. If so, what is the remedy including any reasonably foreseeable consequential loss, were the Applicants entitled to cancel the contract and if so, is TQ entitled to any relief for any value of the work performed? What was the agreed scope of the work and any timeframe? 4. There was no dispute and I accept that the parties signed a written contact on 18th of August to repair their house, for $23,300.00 plus GST ($26,795.00) or that the Ap...

4. IN & UI v C Ltd [2023] NZDT 394 (31 August 2023) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...and so it is unlikely that a finding could have been made that UI and IN breached the contract. 38. For these reasons the counterclaim by C Ltd is dismissed. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 31 August 2023 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

5. [2024] NZEmpC 109 LDJ v EZC [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...or defence brought in the alternative. This can be illustrated by the Oxford English Dictionary’s primary definition of “incidental”: “Occurring or liable to occur in fortuitous or subordinate conjunction with something else of which it forms no essential part”; thus the question must relate to some essential part of the pleadings for it to be not incidental.5 [12] It is not necessary for the applicant to prove that the question of law will fall for determination in the c...

6. Form 51 Criminal amendment to grant.pdf [pdf, 114 KB]

   Templates V16 – March 2019  page 1  03/19 form 51  Amendment to Grant  Criminal Legal Aid  Legal aid file no.    Lead provider’s ref.        Customer    Provider    Court        Amendment sought    Replace fixed fee    High Cost Case    Additional work when fixed fee has been claimed    Disbursements    Estimate          Applicable fee schedule    A‐C    D    E    F    G    H‐I    J    Ple...

7. Form 51 Criminal legal aid [pdf, 114 KB]

   Templates V16 – March 2019  page 1  03/19 form 51  Amendment to Grant  Criminal Legal Aid  Legal aid file no.    Lead provider’s ref.        Customer    Provider    Court        Amendment sought    Replace fixed fee    High Cost Case    Additional work when fixed fee has been claimed    Disbursements    Estimate          Applicable fee schedule    A‐C    D    E    F    G    H‐I    J    Ple...

8. Form 51a Criminal Amendment High Cost [pdf, 194 KB]

   Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 09/22 form 51a Amendment to Grant Criminal Legal Aid HIGH COST CASE Legal aid file no. Lead provider’s ref. Customer Provider Court Amendment sought Replace fixed fee High Cost Case Additional work when fixed fee has been claimed Disbursements Estimate Applicable fee schedule A-C D-F G H & I J Please tick the following criteria that is specific to your case. Fixed fee...

9. Owen v Hauiti - Kiwinui A (2016) 57 Tairawhiti MB 70 (57 TRW 70) [pdf, 290 KB]

   ...Tairawhiti MB 182-186 (43 TRW 182-186) 57 Tairawhiti MB 80 [32] Counsel contends that the Court should have regard to the Māori Appellate Court decision of Tohu – Te Horo 2B2B2B Residue where the Court determined that the homestead formerly owned by Haami and Te Ani Tohu on Te Horo 2B2B2B block together with the skyline garage built by Matthew Tohu were the property of Sebastian Matthew Tohu. Counsel submits this case is persuasive and in favour of the Owen whānau as the...

10. Goher v Hammadieh [2016] NZIACDT 1 (14 January 2016) [pdf, 184 KB]

    ...Zealand Immigration Advice (Level 7); and [42.2] Complied in full with the orders in this decision, Yasin & Nawaz v Hammadieh [2015] NZIACDT 4, and Ikbarieh v Hammadieh [2014] NZIACDT 111. 7 Further direction [43] The Tribunal requests that the Registrar deliver a copy of this decision, and the substantive decision on this complaint, to the office of the Australian Migration Agents Registration Authority. DATED at WELLINGTON this 14 th day of January 2016...