Search Results

1. [2011] NZEmpC 143 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v CMP Rangitikei Ltd [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...resorted to locking out union members since 19 October 2011. It has been able to maintain production, or at least a temporarily sufficient level of production, using existing non-union labour and by using a growing number of employees who were formerly union members but have decided, in the circumstances, to sign individual employment agreements with CMPRL under which they are now working. [7] It is really only the current and prospective lockouts of union members with which t...

2. [2012] NZEmpC 38 Munro v Hibiscus Coast Security [pdf, 112 KB]

   WAYNE DESMOND MUNRO V NS SECURITY LIMITED, FORMERLY KNOWN AS HIBISCUS COAST SECURITY LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 38 [2 March 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 38 ARC 30/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN WAYNE DESMOND MUNRO Plaintiff AND NS SECURITY LIMITED, FORMERLY KNOWN AS HIBISCUS COAST SECURITY LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 10 November 2011 (Heard at Auck

3. McCarthy & Anor v CAC 20007 & Anor [2014] NZREADT 94 [pdf, 53 KB]

   ...that the buyers had to beware and instead imposed a positive duty on the agents to disclose. He submitted that the doctrine of caveat emptor has no application under Rule 6.5. • He submitted that the Complaints Assessment Committee incorrectly formed the view that the decision to exclude the due diligence provisions in the agreement with the sale and purchase was relevant to Mr Matutinovich’s obligations. He submitted that the Complaints Assessment Committee seriously failed to c...

4. [2018] NZEmpC 143 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd [pdf, 316 KB]

   ...[4] On 24 September 2018, Infinity’s lawyers sent an email to Mr Lorigan, requesting him to comply with the Court’s costs judgment and pay the sum of $14,495 for costs without delay. Advice as to when payment could be expected was also requested. The evidence suggests there was no response. [5] Mr Lorigan applied to the Court of Appeal for leave to appeal against this Court’s judgments declining Mr Lorigan’s application for joinder,21 and his application for a stay o...

5. Mostafa v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 155 [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...outlined below. 1 Mostafa v Accident Compensation Corporation [2023] NZACC 79. 2 Background [2] At the time of his injury on 8 February 2018, Mr Mostafa was a truck driver for Carter Holt Harvey. [3] According to the ACC injury claim form dated 1 March 2018, the description of Mr Mostafa’s injury was “Throwing strop over truck and felt pain in arm”. The diagnosis was “sprained elbow/forearm – right side”. The claim form included a referral to a physi...

6. Nixon v Attorney-General [2018] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 301 KB]

   ...caregivers of children prior to a separation. He says that this is because from birth, until the age of approximately 18 months, most of a child’s care will be provided by the mother as a “biological necessity” because of breastfeeding. Mr Nixon claims that s 70B(3) indirectly discriminates against him as a male because, as such, he cannot conceive, give birth to, or breastfeed a child. [5] Mr Nixon complains that s 70B(3) of the SSA breaches Part 1A of the Human Rights Act...

7. [2025] NZEmpC 186 Menzies v Corrigan [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...there was no formal application to join him as a party. [18] On 20 May 2025, Ms Stewart filed a memorandum in response, addressing the issue of joinder and seeking leave to file a reply. Leave was also sought to file an affidavit in response to claims Mr Anderson made about a third party in his 15 May 2025 affidavit. [19] By minute dated 21 May 2025, the Court addressed the application for costs against Mr Anderson. It determined that there was no necessity for a fresh or separ...

8. [2015] NZEmpC 77 Adams t/a Untouchable hair & Skin v Brown [pdf, 281 KB]

   ...do so, and that she had also booked in another client for insufficient time. Mr Adams understood Ms X had questioned Ms Brown as to why this had occurred. [36] He said that he then asked Ms Brown whether she had called the client as requested; her response was that she had attempted to do so four or five times. However he said that a check of the outward calls on the salon phone did not support Ms Brown’s assertion. He also telephoned the client who confirmed he had not...

9. OIA-122815.pdf [pdf, 721 KB]

   8 July 2025 Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz Ref: OIA 122815 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Christchurch Justice and Emergency Services Precinct security gates Thank you for your email of 7 June 2025 requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information on the costs for the Christchurch Justice and Emergency Services Precinct building'...

10. Big Hill Station Ltd v Hemana - Awarua o Hinemanu Trust (2015) 43 Takitimu MB 218 (43 TKT 218 ) [pdf, 328 KB]

    ...receipt of a joint memorandum further timetabling directions were issued on 18 January 2012 for the filing of evidence and submissions with a view to a hearing being held in or around April or May 2012. [19] On 14 March 2012 counsel for the trust requested an extension for the filing of evidence and it was agreed that BHS would file their evidence a month later. BHS asked the Court to amend its timetabling directions accordingly. Then on 30 April 2012, following my assignment to...