Search Results

1. KI v X Ltd [2023] NZDT 584 (20 November 2023) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...lower of the two quotes to be fair and reasonable compensation for costs to be incurred to remedy the failed wall and order X Ltd pay KI the sum of $29,953.29. Referee: K. Edwards Date: 20 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

2. OL v TV [2022] NZDT 268 (23 December 2022) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...the motorcycle at his own expense and give OL 48 hours’ notice of when it is to be collected. OL is to make it available for collection, on 48 hours’ notice. Referee: K Rendall Date: 23 December 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

3. MC v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 103 (2 March 2023) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...Having found that the defect is of a substantial character, the Applicant is entitled to reject the goods and is entitled to a full refund of the purchase price. Referee: T Prowse Date: 2 March 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

4. TB & UB v HF [2023] NZDT 307 (8 June 2023) [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...sums is in excess of the claim of $2,000.00. The respondent will be ordered to pay $2,000.00 to the applicants. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 Referee: G.P.Rossiter Date: 8 June 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

5. O Ltd v NT [2023] NZDT 193 (13 April 2023) [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...event that NT terminated the contract without earning sufficient commission to repay the debt, then I find that it was reasonably implied that he would repay the balance of the advance paid to him. I find that an objective bystander observing the formation of the contract would conclude that the parties did not write that term into their agreement because it was obvious to them both. I therefore find that NT is liable to refund O Ltd the full amount of the balance of the advance he receive...

6. ME v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 149 (23 June 2023) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...if she had been told that a credit note would fundamentally alter her position. 12. For the reasons above, I find that B Ltd is liable to pay $8513.60 to ME. Referee Perfect Date: 23 June 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

7. C Ltd v HL [2025] NZDT 61 (12 February 2025) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...Accordingly, I find HL must pay the commission claimed of $21,337.57 being the amount based on the commission percentage recorded in the agency agreement. Referee: Ms Gayatri Jaduram Date: 12 February 2025 Page 3 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply f...

8. Tan v New Zealand Police [2016] NZHRRT 32 [pdf, 327 KB]

   ...Health Board (CCDHB). Following an allegation she had possibly accessed health records to locate the whereabouts of a relative, the New Zealand Police in September 2014 asked the CCDHB to advise whether Ms Tan had in fact accessed such records. That request was made under the Privacy Act 1993. [2] Ms Tan alleges that in making this request the Police breached information privacy principles 1 to 4 and 11. The allegations are denied by the Police. The recusal issue [3] When Ms Tan ma...

9. Welsh - Taiharuru 4C3 (2012) 2012 Chief Judges MB 398 (2012 CJ 398) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...(ii) The applicant did not consent to the gift to Mr Neal; and (iii) The applicant’s father was not present in Court when the gifting was made. [3] Taiharuru 4C3 has since been partitioned. Mr Neal’s shares, received from Milton Welsh, now form part of Taiharuru 4C3C. Background [4] The Case Manager delivered an initial report to me on 11 June 2004. This was distributed to the parties on the same date. On 30 June 2004, Mr Neal sent a letter of objection to the application....

10. LCRO 118/2023 TC v GS (13 December 2023) [pdf, 213 KB]

    ...Firm rendered an invoice to the Trust for the legal work undertaken between January 2019 and termination of the retainer in March 2020. The invoice was for a total of $3,620.00. 4 [20] On 2 April 2020, the applicant sent an email to the Firm requesting an explanation, in the following terms: Would you please email me why you guys did not settle the [purchase] on Monday? and why your boss called the bank on [the following] Tuesday so I am looking for answer? because you told me o...