Search Results

1. TU v TN Ltd [2023] NZDT 484 (26 September 2023) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...a replacement or refund. It refused to do so. Therefore, TU is entitled to cancel the contract and obtain a full refund of the original purchase price. Referee: J P Smith Date: 26 September 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

2. NH v NC & KC [2024] NZDT 816 (25 November 2024) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...view, personally caused [the dog]’s [health condition]. What happened with this dog was, as I see it, an unfortunate accident of fate. Referee: G.P.Rossiter Date: 25 November 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

3. LCRO 136/2023 QT v MZ (8 January 2024) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...outcomes of the meeting. [9] VN and QT prepared a “Memo” dated 25 October 2022. The memo was stated to be “private and confidential to the Trustees only” as well as “without prejudice”. Its subject was “[VN and QT] In Reply to [TL’s] Requests Re: [the Property] For The Pending Christmas Period.” [10] On 31 October 2022, the respondent wrote to VN and QT, with a copy to Mr LG. In her letter, she: (a) recorded her instructions from TL; (b) stated her understandi...

4. Cook v Manawatu Community Law Centre [2021] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 261 KB]

   ...Law Centre [2021] NZHRRT 10.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2021] NZHRRT 10 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] Against this backdrop Ms Abraham, who was employed by MCLC as its Work and Income New Zealand (WINZ) advocate, made two requests to WINZ for Ms Cook’s personal information. [3] The first request was made on 8 July 2016, immediately after an acrimonious performance review of Ms Cook by Ms Herbert, the Manager of MCLC. The request to WINZ asked whether Ms Cook...

5. LCRO 149/2020 WM v VE and DP (14 December 2021) [pdf, 361 KB]

   ...to 1 or more of the clients". 4 [17] He said it was “inappropriate” for Mr VE and Mr DP to advise the company on the restructure proposal, and they ought to have referred the four [Z] shareholders/directors for independent advice if requested to act for them on that matter. [18] Dr WM stated the firm no longer acted for the company, but “despite having acted” for the company and him personally, “continues to act” for the four [Z] shareholders/directors and their...

6. Tangi v ACC [2013] NZACA 9 [pdf, 35 KB]

   ...settled law that the contended point of law must be capable of bona fide and serious argument to qualify for the grant of such leave to appeal. Care must be taken to avoid allowing issues of fact to be dressed up as questions of law as appeals on the former are proscribed. However a mixed question of law and fact can amount to an error of law. [5] Even if the qualifying criteria are made out, this Court has an extensive discretion I the grant or refusal of leave so as to ensure...

7. [2016] NZSSAA 50 (31 May 2016) [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...steps to recover the debt, pursuant to s 86(1) and s 86A of the Social Security Act 1964. The appeal was adjourned for that purpose. [3] Ultimately, submissions were not received from the appellant until 27 November 2015. The appellant was then requested to provide information about her financial circumstances which had been omitted from her earlier submission. Further submissions were received on 14, 21 and 24 December. A Ministry response to these submissions, including calculation...

8. IB v QY LCRO 242 / 2010 (10 February 2012) [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...been drafted by members of the company with the assistance of the AEP and its legal counsel. One of the partners, Mr AZ, acted in that matter, and suggested a few minor changes, but neither he nor anyone else in the firm was involved in the final form of agreement or its signing. [3] The Agreement provided for the eventuality of a member leaving the company either voluntarily or compulsorily (due to default by the Shareholder), or by death. By clause 17, the Agreement provided f...

9. [2017] NZEmpC 163 Briscoe v Oceania Dairy Ltd [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...benefit of a performance appraisal, was not treated with dignity and respect, and was not provided with adequate information about key performance indicators for her job. It is possible that other aspects of the management of Ms Briscoe’s work formed either parts of these claims or separate allegations of unjustified disadvantage. [6] The Authority dismissed all of these alleged grievances because they had been raised outside the 90 days allowed for doing so in the Employment Rela...

10. Director of Human Rights Proceedings [Lightbody] v Corrections (Joinder of Second Defendant) [2018] NZHRRT 32 [pdf, 234 KB]

    ...relevant events and at least two CCTV cameras recorded the alleged assault and associated aftermath. Subsequently the footage from at least one of the CCTV cameras was deleted or lost. [6] When in December 2015 Mr Lightbody made an information privacy request for a copy of the CCTV footage relating to the incident for the purposes of considering a civil claim against Corrections, Corrections declined, relying on s 27(1)(c) and s 29(1)(a) of the Privacy Act 1993 (PA). It claimed disclo...