Search Results

1. LCRO 104/2016 and LCRO 192/2016 LP v PR (27 June 2019) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...trustees were not. Mr PR has explained his position in that regard in his submissions. That is accepted and does not raise concern over misconduct. [82] There is nothing in the materials Mr LP has provided on review that supports this Office forming a different view to that reached by the Committee. There is no basis on which to order Mr PR to pay back everything he received from the Trustees. Mr PR accepts the proper course is to confirm the Committee’s decisions. There is no...

2. [2024] NZSAAA 1 (20 September 2024) [pdf, 771 KB]

   ...good reason to further delay determination of this appeal. In particular, I found that the Appellant remained able to: (a) provide all relevant information to the Authority; and (b) properly respond to information provided by the Ministry and requests for information from the Authority. [9] Accordingly, in a Minute of 19 July 2024, I declined to delay the appeal further and advised the parties that I would proceed to determine this appeal after giving the Appellant further oppo...

3. [2022] NZACC 167 — Peni v ACC (24 August 2022) [pdf, 287 KB]

   ...husband’s consultation. Hurt R Hip when stumbled taking out recycling bins. Twisted hip. Strain? [4] On 3 June 2020, the appellant had a telephone consultation with Suzie Costelloe, Practice Nurse, at the Bream Bay Medical Centre and an ACC injury claim form was completed. The description of injury was: Putting rubbish bins out started to lose grip on recycling bins, turned quickly, stumbled, hurt hip and upper leg, not resolving. [5] The nurse also noted: Did go to osteop...

4. [2014] NZEmpC 115 Atkinson v Phoenix Commercial Cleaners Ltd [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...for legal assistance and accordingly sought legal aid. She applied for a legal aid grant on 18 December 2013. In the event, her application for legal aid was not approved until 17 February 2014. It appears that during this period there was a request for further information by the Legal Services Agency, which she duly responded to. [6] The respondent takes issue with the extent of the delay. In particular it is submitted that the period between receipt of the Authority’s determ...

5. AGS v ZTW [2013] NZDT 491 (15 January 2014) [pdf, 21 KB]

   ...6-8 weeks and ZTW strengthened the handles and put on a longer cable. He says he discovered a damaged blade during this time but replaced it at no cost to AGS. [4] When ZTW attempted to return the mower to AGS in June, they rejected it and requested a full refund. In the meantime, they had spent $120.00 on repairs to their old Flymo and claim this amount, the purchase price of the Phoenix hover mower of $988.00 and the filing fee of $45.00. [5] During the adjournment perio...

6. [2021] NZEmpC 67 Mataura Valley Milk Ltd v Scott [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...Ltd v Scott [2020] NZEmpC 120. 3 Mataura Valley Milk Ltd v Scott [2020] NZEmpC 140; Mataura Valley Milk Ltd v Scott [2020] NZEmpC 152. (c) Serious loss to Mataura Valley may result if the search orders are not maintained and varied as requested. [8] Mataura Valley provided a draft order to vary the existing search orders, the terms of which are acceptable with modifications, as set out in Schedule 1 to this judgment. Orders are made accordingly. [9] Costs are reserved...

7. [2023] NZEnvC 202 Queenstown Park Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 4 MB]

   ...s279(1) RMA, such order being by consent rather than representing a decision or determination on the merits pursuant to s297. The court understands for the present purposes that: 4 (a) all parties to the proceeding have executed the memorandum requesting this order; (b) all parties are satisfied that all matters for the court’s endorsement fall within the court’s jurisdiction and conform to the relevant requirements and objectives of the RMA, including in particular, pt 2...

8. [2014] NZEmpC 156 Rolling Thunder Motor Company Ltd v Kennedy [pdf, 60 KB]

   ...solicitor on the record for the plaintiff. [11] After delays in the Court being informed whether the essential pre-requisites for such an application had been met, the Court made an order to that effect on 16 May 2014. The parties were then requested to advise the Court as to what steps would then be appropriate; in particular the plaintiff was requested to advise whether the company proposed to proceed with the challenge at all. [12] On 26 May 2014, Mr Elles, the Managing Dire...

9. EH v D Ltd [2022] NZDT 36 (10 January 2022) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...and cannot be returned without significant cost to the consumer, the respondent is obliged under s 22(2)(a) to collect the furniture at its own expense. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 10 January 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

10. XU v I Ltd [2023] NZDT 621 (2 November 2023) [pdf, 196 KB]

    ...trespass when it removed the XU without permission. Therefore, MO is entitled to a full refund of the $400.00 he was required to pay to get his car released. Referee: Sara Grayson Date: 2 November 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...