Search Results

1. [2012] NZEmpC 94 Gini v Literacy Training Ltd [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...challenge to a determination, the Court can make an order encompassing costs in the Authority when the Authority itself has made no order but simply reserved the question of costs. The issue was raised, however, by the full Court in PBO Ltd (formally Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz. 3 In Goodfellow v Building Connexion Ltd trading as ITM Building Centre, 4 which was a case where costs had not been fixed by the Authority, Judge Couch, following Da Cruz, confirmed that this Court h...

2. Barry v Devi [2011] NZIACDT 29 (5 September 2011) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...the payment of a penalty not exceeding $10,000; (g) an order for the payment of all or any of the costs or expenses of the investigation, inquiry, or hearing, or any related prosecution; (h) an order directing the licensed immigration adviser or former licensed immigration adviser to refund all or any part of fees or expenses paid by the complainant or another person to the licensed immigration adviser or former licensed immigration adviser; (i) an order directing the licensed immigra...

3. Couper v Rangipunga - Parihaka X Trust (2008) 212 Aotea MB 38 (212 AOT 38) [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...issues were raised by the trustees including the awarding of contracts, proposals to engage a farm manager for the trust, notice of and attendance at trustee meetings, conflict of interest and ownership of buildings on trust land. Mr Couper also requested the removal of Mr Rangipunga and Ms Taylor because he claimed they had failed to attend four trustee meetings without proper excuse. Mr Rangipunga questioned the propriety of trustees making decisions when it appeared that a confli...

4. [2019] NZEmpC 171 Thorne v Rolton [pdf, 352 KB]

   ...[8] Mr Rolton’s version of events was significantly different. He said that the discussion about resuming work was between him and Mr Thorne, and he was given a choice of returning on 8 January 2018, or a week later on 15 January 2018. He informed Mr Thorne that he would return on 15 January, unless his money ran out in which case he would come back earlier. [9] There was no record of this meeting and what, if anything, was agreed. Mr Rolton returned to work on 15 January 201...

5. [2021] NZACC 196 - Ambridge v ACC (8 December 2021 [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...decision of a Reviewer dated 5 November 2020. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review, declining jurisdiction in respect of the Corporation’s decision to revoke cover for a right-ankle fracture. 2 Background [2] Ms Ambridge (formerly Edwards) was born in 1960. At 18 months old, she suffered poliomyelitis. This primarily affected her right leg. In 1972, the condition led to surgical lengthening of the right leg. [3] On 24 July 1987, Ms Ambridge fell down som...

6. [2010] NZEmpC 140 Weston v Advkit Para Legal Services Ltd [pdf, 49 KB]

   ...into the corner of the hall where she fell over a telephone stand and chair and hit her head against the wall. This was accompanied by further abuse. Mrs Dixon-McIver, who saw that attack, ordered Kirk out of the house but let him back in on his request. Kirk then assaulted Mrs Weston for a third time. He was then ordered to leave the house a second time by Mrs Dixon-McIver who tried to help Mrs Weston to her feet. When Kirk was allowed back into the house again he at...

7. Murray v Parker - Paihia 3B9B Residue [2018] Chief Judges MB 707 (2018 CJ 707) [pdf, 346 KB]

   ...determine the status of the land to be Maori freehold land (and providing further protection upon registration of the instrument of title with LINZ) A current search of Land Information New Zealand shows no current certificate of title exists. A request for a new certificate of title is to be sought from Land Information New Zealand. 8. At 28 Kaitaia MB 24 (24 March 2009) the Court determined the status of the Paihia block to be Māori freehold land. 9. On 17 August 2009 Land Inf...

8. TZ & AS v TQ [2024] NZDT 220 (8 March 2024) [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...if no time was set a reasonable time? c. If so, what is the remedy including any reasonably foreseeable consequential loss, were the Applicants entitled to cancel the contract and if so, is TQ entitled to any relief for any value of the work performed? What was the agreed scope of the work and any timeframe? 4. There was no dispute and I accept that the parties signed a written contact on 18th of August to repair their house, for $23,300.00 plus GST ($26,795.00) or that the Ap...

9. IN & UI v C Ltd [2023] NZDT 394 (31 August 2023) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...and so it is unlikely that a finding could have been made that UI and IN breached the contract. 38. For these reasons the counterclaim by C Ltd is dismissed. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 31 August 2023 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

10. LCRO 71/2016 ZB v YA (23 August 2018) [pdf, 230 KB]

    ...incorporated on 10 April 2015 (the company). [3] The company rented a residential property (the property) from another company (the landlord), of which Mr ZB was a director. [4] Mr and Mrs WD are specified as the occupiers on the application form, which also bore the name of the company with Mr YA as its director, as applicants. Mr YA appears to have signed the application form, although there seem to be differences between the handwriting that suggest the form was completed by...