Search Results

1. Engelbrecht TRI-2020-100-007 Procedural Order 5 [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...to considering the pleadings only and may assess evidence in determining whether to remove a party.5 Ellis J has observed that if the Tribunal is to hear and determine claims in an “expeditious and cost-effective way, [it] must be able to perform an active gate-keeping role in terms of both the joinder and removal of parties.”6 This can include the early receipt and assessment of evidence. [7] In circumstances where the evidence is contentious or challenged, or a party’s v...

2. Form 51 Criminal amendment to grant.pdf [pdf, 114 KB]

   Templates V16 – March 2019  page 1  03/19 form 51  Amendment to Grant  Criminal Legal Aid  Legal aid file no.    Lead provider’s ref.        Customer    Provider    Court        Amendment sought    Replace fixed fee    High Cost Case    Additional work when fixed fee has been claimed    Disbursements    Estimate          Applicable fee schedule    A‐C    D    E    F    G    H‐I    J    Ple...

3. Form 51 Criminal legal aid [pdf, 114 KB]

   Templates V16 – March 2019  page 1  03/19 form 51  Amendment to Grant  Criminal Legal Aid  Legal aid file no.    Lead provider’s ref.        Customer    Provider    Court        Amendment sought    Replace fixed fee    High Cost Case    Additional work when fixed fee has been claimed    Disbursements    Estimate          Applicable fee schedule    A‐C    D    E    F    G    H‐I    J    Ple...

4. Form 51a Criminal Amendment High Cost [pdf, 194 KB]

   Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 09/22 form 51a Amendment to Grant Criminal Legal Aid HIGH COST CASE Legal aid file no. Lead provider’s ref. Customer Provider Court Amendment sought Replace fixed fee High Cost Case Additional work when fixed fee has been claimed Disbursements Estimate Applicable fee schedule A-C D-F G H & I J Please tick the following criteria that is specific to your case. Fixed fee...

5. Andrews v Commissioner of Police [2013] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...Andrews and third parties was authorised and/or required by the CDA because they were, in terms of s 8 of the CDA, relevant in that they tended to support or rebut or had a material bearing on the case against Ms Edmonds. In addition they had been requested by her counsel. [33.4] Section 19(1) of the CDA deals with exhibits. It provides that if an exhibit is reasonably capable of reproduction, the prosecutor must disclose a copy of it to the defendant upon request. The exhibit does n...

6. Owen v Hauiti - Kiwinui A (2016) 57 Tairawhiti MB 70 (57 TRW 70) [pdf, 290 KB]

   ...Tairawhiti MB 182-186 (43 TRW 182-186) 57 Tairawhiti MB 80 [32] Counsel contends that the Court should have regard to the Māori Appellate Court decision of Tohu – Te Horo 2B2B2B Residue where the Court determined that the homestead formerly owned by Haami and Te Ani Tohu on Te Horo 2B2B2B block together with the skyline garage built by Matthew Tohu were the property of Sebastian Matthew Tohu. Counsel submits this case is persuasive and in favour of the Owen whānau as the...

7. [2020] NZEnvC 126 Beresford v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 334 KB]

   ...of the public access network” around Sticky Forest and through Kirimoko’s land. Bike Wanaka [27] Bike Wanaka is an incorporated society. It is one of Wānaka’s largest community groups with well over one thousand members. It was formed in 2009 to “represent the interests of cyclists in” the Lake Wānaka/Upper Clutha Region including as to mountain biking. More specifically, its objects or aims include:15 To liaise and maintain the links we have with private...

8. [2024] NZEmpC 109 LDJ v EZC [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...or defence brought in the alternative. This can be illustrated by the Oxford English Dictionary’s primary definition of “incidental”: “Occurring or liable to occur in fortuitous or subordinate conjunction with something else of which it forms no essential part”; thus the question must relate to some essential part of the pleadings for it to be not incidental.5 [12] It is not necessary for the applicant to prove that the question of law will fall for determination in the c...

9. H Trust v Southern Response Earthquake Services Ltd [2019] CEIT-2019-0011 [pdf, 997 KB]

   IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEI-00XX-2019 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN H & H and DB as trustees of the H TRUST Applicant AND SR Respondent Date: 10, 31 October, 14 November, 10, 11, 20 December 2019 Appearances: B for Applicant F and S for Respondent __________________________________________________________________________

10. Goher v Hammadieh [2016] NZIACDT 1 (14 January 2016) [pdf, 184 KB]

    ...Zealand Immigration Advice (Level 7); and [42.2] Complied in full with the orders in this decision, Yasin & Nawaz v Hammadieh [2015] NZIACDT 4, and Ikbarieh v Hammadieh [2014] NZIACDT 111. 7 Further direction [43] The Tribunal requests that the Registrar deliver a copy of this decision, and the substantive decision on this complaint, to the office of the Australian Migration Agents Registration Authority. DATED at WELLINGTON this 14 th day of January 2016...