Search Results

1. Idea Services v Attorney-General (Interim Order Application) [2013] NZHRRT 24 [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...with all remaining remedy questions. And, although we do not mean to diminish the importance of the other remedies that have been sought in the claim, the reality is that to a large extent they are matters that either depend on, or will at least be informed by, the determination of the primary questions and the assessment of damages. In any event, if there are any questions of remedy that the High Court is not willing to deal with at first instance, it will be able to remit any such questi...

2. CM v XH LCRO 97 / 2010 (5 July 2011) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...This is a statutory obligation imposed by Section 139(2) of the Act. [4] The Standards Committee provided a statement of reasons shortly thereafter and this was provided to both parties who were invited to respond and provide any further information as they wished to forward. The Applicant raised a query about whether his review application to this Office had been sent to the Standards Committee. I am able to confirm that this was not done and should he wish to receive a copy of...

3. AF v ZU Ltd and ZUZ Ltd [2013] NZDT 219 (8 May 2013) [pdf, 23 KB]

   ...is dismissed. AF are to pay $703.69 to ZUZ Ltd on or before 20 May 2013. Facts [1] During the hearing the correct respondent was identified as ZUZ Ltd [2] In December 2012, a Toyota Surf belonging to the applicants broke down. ZUZ Ltd was requested to recover the vehicle and repair the fault. ZUZ Ltd diagnosed the fault as a leaking injector pump seal. The repair work and some other maintenance items were authorised. The applicants paid the account for the work, being $1,401....

4. AG Ltd v ZT Ltd [2014] NZDT 607 (6 May 2014) [pdf, 23 KB]

   ...[6] This is relevant as if there has not been a misrepresentation and loss, ZT Ltd has to pay what it agreed to for the site. [7] AA has explained how she had an expectation of between 15,000 and 20,000 people attending the show based on the information that she was provided with by AG Ltd. She had decided to attend the show as she had worked through the numbers based on the sales from other shows that ZT Ltd had attended and was confident that the show would be a pr...

5. Clarke v Runanga o Onuku - Te Whanau a Hinemataiao Puhirere Incorporation (2001) 92 South Island MB 225 (92 SI 225) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...unsuccessful. He referred the matter to the Maori Land Court for determination. On the 13 January 2000 I directed that the matter should be considered afresh. A judicial conference was held 9 March 2000 where it was made clear by Mr Clark that he claimed to represent the Ngai Tarewa hapu. There was considerable opposition to that claim. It was decided further discussions should take place between Te Runanga 0 Onuku and Mr Clark facilitated by the Registrar. On 29 April 2000 a hui was duly...

6. McKenzie v ACC (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2024] NZACC 65 [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...persistent medial sided knee pain. Dr Rossaak considered that all non-operative options had been exhausted and the plan was to debride the medial meniscus. [10] On 18 March 2020, Dr Rossaak submitted an assessment report and treatment plan, requesting accident compensation funding for an arthroscopic debridement of the right knee. Dr Rossaak referred to the causal link between the proposed treatment and the covered injury as follows: Judith can’t recall her mechanism of injury...

7. [2023] NZEmpC 101 GF v Comptroller of Customs [pdf, 513 KB]

   ...appointed to an ACOM role at a South Island port in October 2020. [3] The government introduced a vaccination programme which was rolled-out to front line workers, including those working in managed isolation facilities. The roll- out was informed by a cross agency assessment tool that had earlier been developed (the 18 February 2021 Guidance). The 18 February 2021 Guidance was used by Customs to inform decision-making around which of its workers would be captured in the initia...

8. LCRO 78/2019 EW v PT and AM (3 February 2021) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...Respondents The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr EW filed an Application for Review dated 19 June 2019, received in this Office on 20 June 2019. Part 2 of the application form requires the name of the other party to the review to be completed. Mr EW named the other party as being [Law Firm A]. [2] The application for review related to the determination of Mr EW’s complaint about Messrs PT and AM (complaint...

9. Jenner v CAC 10163 & QS - Sanitised [2011] NZREADT 35 [pdf, 123 KB]

   ...September 2010 Jenner (document 55) sent to Vallant Hooker a letter recording that the contract had been signed, enclosed a copy and advised the deposit was held in their trust account and it would be held for 10 working days. [9] When Mr King requested the deposit to be released he provided a deposit slip to the agent Ms Maloney. This was for Nova Construction an entity apparently unrelated to the vendors. Ms Maloney’s evidence was that she did not have anything to do with the m...

10. [2014] NZEmpC 62 Casey v Sensi Merivale Limited [pdf, 107 KB]

    ...not possibly succeed and had persisted in those proceedings after that fact had been drawn to the plaintiff’s attention. 6 The plaintiff also cites the recent judgment of this Court in Asiaciti Trust New Zealand Ltd v Harris in support of her claims to costs. 7 [5] The defendant accepts that it is appropriate for the Court to consider an award of costs covering the proceedings in the Authority, despite costs having been reserved by it. I agree that it is open to the Court to d...