11366 items matching your search terms
...view, personally caused [the dog]’s [health condition]. What happened with this dog was, as I see it, an unfortunate accident of fate. Referee: G.P.Rossiter Date: 25 November 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...
...proper for the Tribunal to wait until the completion of the process at the United Nations Human Rights Committee. I believe I have made it very clear on this matter. [18] We are of the view that it would be wrong to accede to this latest deferral request. It is now almost three years since the Tribunal decision was given on 19 July 2010 and experience shows that proceedings before the UN Human Rights Committee can be protracted. The delay involved will be measured not in months, but i...
...which AvSec said would justify an increase. For the reasons I have already given, I am not persuaded there should be an uplift. [33] Next, I consider the AVOs’ point that their financial circumstances should be taken into account. At the request of the Court, detailed affidavits have been filed. [34] I am satisfied, on the basis of that material, that each AVO continues to face significant financial challenges due to loss of their AvSec income which they have not been able to...
...Johnston without meeting the obligation to support him. Further, she submitted that the notification was a critical element of the employer’s decision-making process that is being challenged. Therefore, she submitted that the notification to OTBNZ forms part of his personal grievance for unjustified dismissal. [19] In respect of the first question of law, Ms Fechney submitted that the notification was premature and breached the employer’s obligations to explore reasonable ac...
...outcomes of the meeting. [9] VN and QT prepared a “Memo” dated 25 October 2022. The memo was stated to be “private and confidential to the Trustees only” as well as “without prejudice”. Its subject was “[VN and QT] In Reply to [TL’s] Requests Re: [the Property] For The Pending Christmas Period.” [10] On 31 October 2022, the respondent wrote to VN and QT, with a copy to Mr LG. In her letter, she: (a) recorded her instructions from TL; (b) stated her understandi...
Legal Aid Services use only Approve Further information Refuse Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 15 Amendment to Grant Waitangi Tribunal Proceedings Legal Aid File No. Date Covers the period from to Customer WAI Number Provider Inquiry Stage of Inquiry for this Claim Stage 1 – Case Book Stage 2 – Interlocutory Conferencing Stage 3 – Hearing Lead Provider Provider 2 Other Provider Numb...
...you will be notified when you get to the point where you can file a challenge with the Authority. If you want the Authority to review this decision, you must apply within two months from the date you are advised of Inland Revenue's decision. Use this form to apply: Notice of claim How much does it cost? It costs $552 (including GST) to apply for a review. This fee can be paid online using File and Pay What you need to send us You need to send us 3 copies of this form, Inland Revenue’s decisio...
...to 1 or more of the clients". 4 [17] He said it was “inappropriate” for Mr VE and Mr DP to advise the company on the restructure proposal, and they ought to have referred the four [Z] shareholders/directors for independent advice if requested to act for them on that matter. [18] Dr WM stated the firm no longer acted for the company, but “despite having acted” for the company and him personally, “continues to act” for the four [Z] shareholders/directors and their...
...Law Centre [2021] NZHRRT 10.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2021] NZHRRT 10 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] Against this backdrop Ms Abraham, who was employed by MCLC as its Work and Income New Zealand (WINZ) advocate, made two requests to WINZ for Ms Cook’s personal information. [3] The first request was made on 8 July 2016, immediately after an acrimonious performance review of Ms Cook by Ms Herbert, the Manager of MCLC. The request to WINZ asked whether Ms Cook...
...following documents have been proactively released in accordance with Cabinet Office Circular CO (23) 4, "Proactive Release of Cabinet Material: Updated Requirements". Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been noted and no public interest has been identified that would outweigh the reasons for withholding it. No....