Search Results

1. [2023] NZEmpC 56 Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand v Public Service Association, Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi [pdf, 471 KB]

   ...interim payment might be attached – would work across the Allied groupings given the potentially different findings and timings of commencement which could transpire for the various roles involved. [33] Going on to discuss the resourcing request, he said this was challenging, given the pay equity claim had been raised in respect of more than 100 listed jobs. He also said the DHBs were currently providing significant resources to the pay equity claims. However, he would take...

2. Cambie v ACC [2012] NZACA 7 [pdf, 72 KB]

   ...the medical misadventure for which cover was sought was alleged as being caused by medical error, or medical mishap. [3] With respect to the application for leave to appeal out of time, the grounds are, in summary, that there is new medical information in the form of a medical report by Dr Garesh Kanji which provides strong support for the appellant’s claim, that was not available until 2007; the Corporation contributed to the delay from that time, and there is no prejudice as the...

3. [2006] NZEmpC AC 74/06 Sandifer v Plumbers Gasfitters & Drainlayers Board NZ [pdf, 34 KB]

   ...the defendant as to the plaintiff’s ability to work are of some substance because the plaintiff has not taken the opportunity extended to him of refuting them. [23] However because of the indication of the lack of income disclosed by the tax forms I am prepared to reduce the amount of the award sought by the defendant in order to provide some realistic response to the plaintiff’s claims of impecuniosity. I therefore order the plaintiff to pay $4,000 as a contribution towards the...

4. DT form 4 - acknowledge applicants insurer [pdf, 743 KB]

   For more information visit www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals Disputes Tribunal Z Z Z Page 1 For more information visit www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals DT 07/11 - 4 What is this form for? Use this form if you (the applicant) have been, are entitled to be, or have sought to be, indemnified (that is, compensated) by your insurer for any loss caused by or arising out of the act, omission, or event on which your Disputes Tribunal claim is based, and your insurer wishes to waive notice of procee...

5. Te Manutukutuku Issue 9 [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   ...Trust and leased to Government Property Services (GPS). The claimants were concerned that sub-leases were being made by Government Property Services at rents well above that being paid the Maori owners. The Tribunal accepted the claimants' request that urgency be given and a hearing was held at Te Tatou 0 to Po marae, Petone, in late March, 1991. The Tribunal consisted of Mr Bill Wilson, the presiding officer, Bishop Manuhuia Bennett, Mrs Georgina Te Heuheu and Professor Gordon...

6. Mitchell v Corrections [2023] NZHRRT 18 [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...Britton, at the 1 This decision is to be cited as Mitchell v Corrections [2023] NZHRRT 18 (Note publication restrictions). IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2023] NZHRRT 18 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 request of the Parole Board. Later that year the New Zealand Police (the Police) requested the [medical] assessment to assist them in preparing a plan to manage the risk of harm to Police staff if Ms Mitchell was released. After consultatio...

7. NE v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to Appeal to High Court) [2025] NZACC 188 [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...Corporation regarding the software. The applicant referred to “decisions” dated variously between 7 and 29 August 2022 and 7 October 2022. The reviewer dismissed the application on the basis there was no reviewable decision. That review decision formed the basis of the appeal before Judge Henare. Decision of the District Court [20] The issues for the Court were- (a) Whether the review application of 2 August 2022 for dental treatment for veneers/botox constitutes a reque...

8. BQ BQB v YJ Ltd [2015] NZDT 799 (1 June 2015) [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...that YJ Limited was given notice of the assignment and did not protest the same nor raise any issues as to the extent of what it would or would not recognise as being assigned by any deed. I have not been persuaded YJ Limited’s ‘silence’ can form the basis of an actionable misrepresentation or that YJ Limited had an active obligation to disabuse parties of any erroneous beliefs they may have formed as to the availability of entitlements under the policy. If it w...

9. LCRO 117/2022 VN v SC (16 May 2024) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...actually paid for. [16] The respondent forwarded this email to Mr DS and Ms WT stating: My clients response – his points appear valid. We don’t even have the names of the patients. [17] The applicant said that Company B subsequently lodged two claims in the [Tribunal], one against Company A regarding the treatment of the retention fund and the other against Mr DS for breach of an alleged undertaking. The fact of the second claim was not evident until this review application wa...

10. LCRO 40/2021 PT v UT and RL t/a Law Firm A (28 April 2022) [pdf, 266 KB]

    ...Mr HT. [3] Mr HT set up a trust, the CTG Trust (“the trust”). At the time the trust was established (2005), Mr HT was a client of a [City A] based law firm, [Law Firm B]. 2 [4] In 2014, [Law Firm B] merged with the firm [Law Firm C], to form the firm [Law Firm A] ([LAW FIRM A]). [5] In December 2011, Mr HT had executed his last will and testament. Mr HT’s will appointed Mrs YW (his wife) as a discretionary beneficiary of his trust. [6] [LAW FIRM A] acted for Mr SZ and...