10904 items matching your search terms
...such as arrears of wages and holiday pay. [32] Another relevant consideration that was not originally touched on when the papers were filed, but on which further information has now been supplied to the Court, is the respondents’ response to requests or demands for compliance with the Authority’s determination. Even when, as here, a challenge is filed and served 3 (1989) 1 PRNZ 451. 4 [1996] 2 ERNZ 546. within time,...
...Committee. It is not clear to me that Mr DL could not rely on the letter of engagement to determine the question of liability. He may yet be able to do so. 9 [39] For the reasons discussed above I have reached a different conclusion from that formed by the Standards Committee on this issue. I do not consider that Mr DL’s actions constitute a contravention of s 161 or fall within the definition of unsatisfactory conduct set out in s 12 of the Act. [40] The determination...
...Code and was prepared to accept a finding of negligence. Additionally, he had offered to obtain MIQ spots for the complainant and his family free of charge by way of apology. [12] It was submitted that the complainant had suffered harm in the form of loss of income from employment and that this was attributable to Mr Liu’s incorrect advice that he could not return to New Zealand. However, the complainant had received the COVID- 19 wage subsidy between March and May 2020 and he...
...$200 for the initial consultation. The Tribunal found the fee to be unreasonable, though accepted Ms Luv could reasonably have charged $840 (in addition to the consultation fee) to provide advice as to eligibility.8 The complainant therefore requests a refund of $6,810, being $7,650 minus $840. [37] The refund of $2,050 offered by Ms Luv on 24 December 2022 when Immigration NZ declined the expression is irrelevant to assessing a reasonable refund, as the expression should neve...
...copy of the minute at 13 Nelson MB 347 dated 22 April 1971 (as set out at para 6 above); f) A copy of the minute and order at 13 Nelson MB 378 dated 4 November 1971 (as set out at para 7 above); g) A copy of a Rural Valuation and Short Report form for the Block dated 27 January 1971; h) A Schedule of the Block’s economic owners and uneconomic owners; i) A copy of a Vesting Order at 24 Nelson MB 14-16 dated 30 March 1999 for the George Love Whānau Trust; and j) A copy of the...
...of paid special leave. Had this option been taken up, it may have gone some way to addressing the concerns the plaintiff now says she has about reputational damage. It also appears from the evidence currently before the Court that, contrary to requests not to contact other staff, the plaintiff did so. While it appears that the Chief Executive has sought to progress the investigation, he is meeting with resistance from the plaintiff. A meeting has been proposed but has not yet be...
...Patel. It stated that Mr Patel would prepare and complete a retirement category residence application ready for lodgement with Immigration New Zealand. The fee would be $15,000 (including GST), broken down as follows: Consultation and review information $ 5,000 Completion of application ready for lodgement $ 5,000 Approval of application $ 5,000 $ 15,000 [6] The fee was expressed to be for work of a standard nature for the type of application. Extra work would accrue an addi...
...under the Harassment Act relating to harassment of the complainant were laid (then or later). [23] By email on 2 June 2022 to Police, Mr Hawkins referred to his 23 May request and the advice he had received about the timeframes for responses. He requested very specific documents under urgency. The information he asked for was: [23.1] A copy of the complaint from the complainant alleging harassment as per the letter delivered to him on 20 May 2022. 5 [23.2] A copy of a...
...he was met by Ms JD, who signed the contract but was acting on the instructions of someone else. The contract stated the parties were D Ltd and Mr SN. 9. Mr JD considered the parties to the contact were D Ltd and Mr SN. 10. A contract is formed when two parties agree to be bound by promises they exchange. Mr SN offered to purchase the car on 1 November 2021. The offer was made to Ms EM in an email beginning “I’d like to buy your AM Vantage”, and he asked some questions. M...
...before providing his undertaking, Mr MB would have needed to check his files to make sure the documents he would promise to provide were in his possession. [76] It is evident from Mr MB’s 8 and 9 November responses to Ms RC’s, and Mr WP’s requests for the documents that Mr MB had not, at that stage, checked his files which he acknowledges he later did following Mr WP’s complaint. [77] I am persuaded by (a) Mr MB’s statement in his 9 November response to Mr WP that the do...