Search Results

1. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Chen [2017] NZLCDT 7 [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...regard the second (Regulations charge) to be even more serious. We adopt the summary of this conduct from Ms Paterson’s submissions: “As part of yearly applications for the renewal of his practising certificate, the Practitioner completed forms (either in hard copy or online) that required the Practitioner to state whether he had obtained any convictions and to disclose any matters that might affect his continuing eligibility for a practising certificate. The Practitioner did no...

2. Kho v Navarette-Scholes [2016] NZIACDT 60 (22 September 2016) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...immediately, and he provided all the documents Ms Navarette-Scholes requested from him. [12] The complainant said Ms Navarette-Scholes did nothing, and the agreement apparently made fees non-refundable if there was no job offer. The complainant said he had formed the view Ms Navarette-Scholes was operating a scam. [13] The Registrar did not seek to provide any further material. Discussion The standard of proof [14] The Tribunal determines facts on the balance of probabilities; howe...

3. BC v C Ltd [2022] NZDT 66 (2 June 2022) [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...would be required from BC. The parties say the project initially involved around 40-46 videos of about 2 minutes each in length and a sum of $110.00 per video was initially agreed as the basis for a contract during negotiations, but C Ltd amended the format to 23 videos of about 5 minutes in length each (or ‘around 20 videos’ as BC contends). 3. BC edited 8 videos for C Ltd during the initial period of the August 2021 lockdown. C Ltd says as the lockdown progressed, there were Co...

4. BI v U Ltd [2024] NZDT 614 (8 August 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...the hearing that it will refund her for this. Conclusion 11. For the above reasons, U Ltd is to pay $60.00 to BI before 8 September 2024. Referee: L Thompson Date: 8 August 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

5. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 2 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 12 MB]

   t e K ā h u i M a u n g a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t e K ā h u i M a u n g a The National Park District Inquiry Report Volume 2 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2013 Wai 1130 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Catalo

6. 2018 Ministry of Justice Annual Report [pdf, 4.3 MB]

   ...justice system deals with people can say a lot about the society it serves. This Ministry has an integral role in New Zealand’s justice system. We provide justice policy advice to the Government, we negotiate the settlement of Treaty of Waitangi claims, we house New Zealand’s largest criminal law firm – the Public Defence Service – we administer legal aid, and we administer New Zealand’s courts and tribunals. We lead the justice sector, and support an integrated sector throu...

7. [2010] NZEmpC 81 Chen v NZ Sugar Co Ltd [pdf, 22 KB]

   ...Mr Chen, when I raised it again, he indicated that he would not then agree to a judicial settlement conference. I also note that in a minute dated 12 November 2009, Chief Judge Colgan directed that Mr Chen was to respond to the defendant’s request for a judicial settlement conference. That minute was followed by an email letter from Mr Chen to the Registry indicating that he did not agree to a judicial settlement conference. [10] In dealing with the memoranda I do not agree...

8. [2009] NZEmpC CC 20/09 Industrial Services Nelson Ltd v Stewart [pdf, 23 KB]

   ...should file a memorandum within 30 days from the date of this judgment. ISNL will have 30 days to respond. [22] In her submissions filed on 24 September 2009 the defendant noted that she had yet to be served with the plaintiff’s statement of claim. If that was so it may raise issues as to the plaintiff’s compliance with reg 12 of the Employment Court Regulations 2000. [23] The defendant, if already served with the plaintiff’s statement of claim, should now, within 30 d...

9. Croft v Hing - Motatau 5E14B3B (2017) 162 Taitokerau MB 155 (162 TTK 155) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...order required Mrs Croft to vacate the shed she was living in. Mrs Croft was at the Māori Land Court office, talking to a member of the Court staff, at the time she learnt of this order. She could have obtained a copy of the relevant application form at that time. She could have, and should have, acted promptly once she learnt of the order. [15] I consider the application could reasonably have been filed sooner. I am not satisfied this application should be accepted out of time...

10. Rao v Singh [2012] NZIACDT 81 (18 October 2012) [pdf, 90 KB]

    ...current address. The processes in dealing with this complaint have been served in accordance with the Act, however it may well be that Mr Singh has not received them. It was his responsibility to ensure that he maintained contact. [4] Ms Rao has requested compensation for the loss of her family’s personal documents, but not provided details of the cost of getting replacements. Decision [5] The grounds on which the complaint has been upheld amount to a contemptuous disregard for th...