Search Results

1. 18.-Manahi-Paewai-Rangitane-o-tamaki-nui-a-rua.pdf [pdf, 5.5 MB]

   ...28. The trustees play an important role in looking after our important taonga namely the Parahaki Island. 29. RoTnaR has a strong relationship with the Parahaki Island and with the Te Apiti Ahu Whenua Trust. CONCLUSION 30. Based on the information and advice we have received to this point in time, RoTNAR supports the Project in its current form. 31. I wish to acknowledge the leadership shown by the Transport Agency in their genuine attempt work with us as real partners. I hav...

2. [2020] NZREADT 28 – Daji v Real Estate Agents Authority (25 June 2020) [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...sale, and asked her to inform the tenants and provide copies of tenancy agreements. [5] On 12 July, a prospective purchaser entered into a conditional agreement for sale and purchase of the property. In late July, Ms Daji contacted Mr Denning requesting an extension of the conditional agreement. Mr Denning advised her that Harcourts had approached him with a prospective purchaser, and were waiting for Ms Daji’s sole agency to end before introducing him to the property. He decli...

3. [2006] NZEmpC WC 23/06 Spotless Services (NZ) Ltd v Morrison [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...required to ensure that the service centre was continuously staffed between 7.30am and 5.30pm Monday to Friday. [2] In August 2005, Ms Morrison sought leave from her manager to undergo private surgery on 16 September 2005. [3] Although her request for leave was refused, she was absent from work from 15 September 2005. She later advised Spotless that the operation had been successful, that she would be fit for work on 17 October 2005 and required leave without pay until then....

4. LCRO 106/2022 MG v WL (30 June 2023) [pdf, 247 KB]

   ...of the proceedings could only have been reached by the parties achieving their respective bargaining positions in 2017 (i.e. the uncertainty of the matter being sent back to the Family Court after both having achieved some measure of success). Request to uplift files [14] [Law firm A] traversed the reasons why Ms WL was unable to comply with Mr PV’s request to uplift Ms MG’s files for a period of three months and submitted that the time taken was reasonable given the circumstance...

5. LCRO 198/2020 CO and EA v LT (29 August 2023) [pdf, 673 KB]

   ...any losses flowed from Mr LT’s conduct. In the application for review they say that the additional rental they were obliged to pay is easily quantified. [94] The complaints and disciplinary process is focused on professional standards. Claims for compensation are primarily a matter for the courts to consider in the form of damages following a successful claim of negligence. [95] The claim for additional rental is not as simple as it might seem. It is unlikely that builder w...

6. W v H [2015] NZIACDT 80 (10 August 2015) [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...was engaged as the exact timing of the alleged phone call is not known; in the circumstances it is irrelevant as both clauses required the adviser to be professional, diligent and respectful (clause 1 of the 2014 code also requires honesty); and perform his services in that manner. The circumstances were: [6.2.1] The adviser swore at his client during a phone conversation and threatened to knock him down. [6.2.2] He threatened in an email to refer his client to the police, and said the...

7. Juan v Ramos [2015] NZIACDT 48 (07 May 2015) [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...Ramos’s response to Immigration New Zealand’s concerns did not provide any comments to the concerns Immigration New Zealand expressed regarding the bona fides of the complainant and his family. [7.6] The complainant subsequently engaged Ms Ramos to request a work visa under section 61 of the Immigration Act 2009. That section provides for the grant of visas is special cases where the applicant is unlawfully in New Zealand, as was the case here. On 30 October 2012, Ms Ramos wrote to I...

8. Koyama v New Zealand Law Society (Costs) [2013] NZHRRT 29 [pdf, 50 KB]

   ...In a decision given on 28 May 2013 the Tribunal awarded the New Zealand Law Society (NZLS) costs in the sum of $8,000. [2] On 7 June 2013 Mr Koyama filed submissions opposing the NZLS costs application. Those submissions amount, in effect, to a request that the Tribunal recall its decision. Three grounds are advanced: 2 [2.1] The Tribunal decision of 28 May 2013 was given prior to the expiry of a 7 June 2013 deadline set by the Tribunal for the filing by Mr Koyama of his submis...

9. OT v PI LCRO 101 / 2011 (20 August 2012) [pdf, 67 KB]

   ...supplied to him by BAJ indicated some discrepancies in that regard. [5] The Standards Committee resolved to take no further action in respect of Mr OT’s complaint on the grounds that Mr PI had acted in good faith and provided an opinion based on information presented to him. It also noted that at the time of the complaint Mr PI had withdrawn his opinion. [6] Mr OT sought a review of that decision by this Office.1 The LCRO agreed with the Standards Committee that there had not be...

10. Morris - Pani Te Wairemana Morris Succession [2016] Chief Judges MB 792 (2016 CJ 792) [pdf, 233 KB]

    ...presentation of the facts of the case to the Court or the Registrar. The Chief Judge may also make such other orders as, in the opinion of the Chief Judge, is necessary in the interests of justice to remedy the mistake or omission. [8] The applicant has requested that the Chief Judge amend the order that is the subject of this application. In terms of Tau v Nga Whanau O Morven & Glenavy – Waihao 903 Section IX Block 2 and Ashwell – Rawinia or Lavinia Ashwell (nee Russell)...