Search Results

1. [2024] NZREADT 38 – TX v REAA (22 October 2024) [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...managed the premises on behalf of the landlord. [4] On 3 April 2019, TX and the landlord entered into a lease agreement for the premises (the lease agreement) which included clause 27.5 (no access in emergency). [5] On 9 July 2020, LI emailed TX requesting payment of unpaid invoices for the premises of $3,064.77. [6] On 21 July 2020, Ms N, who was LI’s assistant, emailed TX attaching a statement noting that in April and May 2020 TX had received a reduction in rent but from June...

2. Edwards - Whakatohea (2018) 181 Waiariki MB 121 (181 WAR 121) [pdf, 247 KB]

   ...the Act.1 [2] As part of interlocutory proceedings, I convened a judicial conference with the parties on 31 January 2018.2 During that conference, Ms Sykes, counsel for Mr Rakuraku (supported by John Te Rehita Pio and members of Ngāti Irapuaia) requested the Court make a determination regarding the s 30 order and its effect. Ms Sykes requested that the determination take place before the substantive hearing of the review. [3] Crown counsel and counsel for the applicant suggested...

3. [2021] NZACC 101 – OM v ACC (12 July 2021) [pdf, 271 KB]

   ...difficult birth”. [28] In November and December 2017 ACC sought a report from Dr Richardson as to what the appellant’s physical injury was and whether that physical injury was caused by treatment. Dr Richardson did not respond to ACC’s request. [29] On 24 April 2019 ACC declined the claim on the basis that it did not meet the criteria for a treatment injury. The decision was upheld at review on 4 October 2019. [30] Dr Peter Jankowitz, paediatrician, gave an opinion date...

4. [2017] NZEnvC 047 North Eastern Investments Limited & Heritage Lands Limited v Auckland Transport [pdf, 477 KB]

   ...necessary for Mr Maassen to attend at least part of the hearing because of the interrelationship of the NOR with the Land Use consent and the imminent hearing of the appeal relating to that consent. He reminded 12 the Court that on 23 February it requested Mr Maassen to attend Court on the following day. [51] Auckland Transport's contention is that if there is to be an award, NEIL's indemnity cost claim of $605,000 should be reduced by $105,000 to a starting point of...

5. Guidelines for self-represented applicants [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...let the member know. Tribunal staff must remain neutral. This means they cannot provide advice on matters in dispute. However, they can offer information on procedural matters and may help direct applicants to services which can provide advice. Forms Apart from the application form, the CEIT does not require that particular forms or formats of documents are used. Processes in the CEIT do not normally require the drafting of long detailed submissions and do not need to take the form of...

6. [2013] NZEmpC 228 Edwards v The Board of Trustees of Bay of Islands College [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...disclosing a number of documents to the plaintiff but there is now a formal challenge by the plaintiff to that objection in respect of only one set of documents. This includes an email dated 2 April 2013 and attachments to it. The email consists of a request by the then LSM of the College for advice from the New Zealand School Trustees Association (the NZSTA). A copy of the email was sent at the same time to the Chair of the Board of Trustees of the College, Gary Hooson. In addi...

7. [2017] NZEmpC 66 Lal v The Warehouse [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...being fit for some work subject to some physical restrictions (relating to prolonged sitting, standing and walking). 1 Lal v The Warehouse Ltd [2016] NZERA Auckland 78. [7] Ms Lal requested a meeting with Ms Wooding (Human Resources) in late September 2013. At the meeting Ms Lal expressed a desire to transfer to a different store to undertake her rehabilitation. She said that her manager was not providing her with lig...

8. CU v DN Ltd [2019] NZDT 1420 (9 September 2019) [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...fault with the brakes and the creeping were related to a defect in gear box. 15. In July 2018 the brakes still would not consistently bring the mower to a stationary position. The blades would not reliably engage or disengage when actioned. CU informed DN that exercised his right to reject the mower and requested a refund. 16. In August DN uplifted the mower and replaced the gear box for a second time. The mower was returned to CU in April 2019 and has not been used since.

9. [2007] NZEmpC CC 7/07 Rooney Earthmoving Ltd v McTague and anor [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...including as recently as several days ago in Paper Reclaim Ltd v Aotearoa International Ltd [2007] NZSC 26. Addressing the incidence of a fiduciary duty, Blanchard J, giving the judgment of the Supreme Court, wrote at para [31]: When parties have formed a contract the correct approach is first to decide exactly what they have agreed upon. Only then should the Court consider whether any particular aspect of their agreement gives rise to a relationship which can properly be character...

10. Te Manutukutuku 74 [pdf, 11 MB]

    ...report in paral­ lel with a series of conferences to get the parties’ views on additional matters. ӹ Applications from a number of Wairarapa ki Tararua claimants were granted urgency in 2018. The Tribunal is conducting two sets of hearings on requests for binding recommendations. One is on the return of former SOE land on the Pouākani 2 block, which the Crown vested in Wairarapa Moana Māori in 1916 and which includes the site of the Maraetai Hydro Power Station owned by Mer...