Search Results

1. Hansen v CAC 10052 & Sadd [2011] NZREADT 26 [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...matters, even if it was a conclusion on which minds might reasonably differ. In such circumstances it is an error for the High Court to defer to the lower Court’s assessment of the acceptability and weight to be accorded to the evidence, rather than forming its own opinion”. [10] In Kacem v Bashir [2010] NZSC 112 the Supreme Court has clarified that the principles in Austin, Nichols apply to Courts exercising jurisdiction over general appeals from lower Courts, not appeals from d...

2. [2013] NZEmpC 54 Checkmate Precision Cutting Tools Ltd v Tomo [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...further meeting took place on 6 April 2010. Messrs Tomo, Austin, Quin and Kiff were in attendance. At the meeting Mr Austin tabled a letter advising that Mr Tomo took issue with the company’s perspective of his terms of employment and detailing requested information which, it was said, was relevant to the issue of consultation and whether it had been adequate. [7] It is apparent that the 6 April 2010 meeting had two phases. Mr Quin’s evidence was that following an adjournment...

3. MVDT Annual Report 2011-2012 (Auckland) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...fault. Ezy Buy were willing to swap the vehicle for another but when the purchaser was told the exchange vehicle was unsuitable for towing a boat she decided to keep the vehicle. The purchaser produced a document which purported to be a tender form which she signed at the time she agreed to buy the vehicle. From the answers given by the purchaser to questions put to her at the hearing the Tribunal was satisfied that the vehicle was not supplied to the purchaser by competitive tend...

4. [2021] NZEmpC 100 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...if the offer made in it was not accepted within five working days, the company was required to file its reply in the Authority and the matter would continue to a hearing. [22] What followed was an email exchange between lawyers including a request for, and comments about, draft settlement agreements. In that exchange Enterprise IT proposed its own terms of settlement and made an offer in an email labelled “without prejudice”. It expressly reserved the ability to refer to t...

5. [2022] NZEmpC 201 Young v Port of Tauranga Ltd [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...of the COVID-19 vaccination. 2. Inform all employees who have refused the COVID-19 vaccination they are free to resume employment under their original contract without the need to be vaccinated forthwith. 3. Cease and desist all forms of advertising, communication and information promoting the COVID-19 vaccinations. The letter concluded that if they did not desist forthwith, criminal complaints of coercion to cause administration of poisons would be laid with th...

6. Curtin v ACC [2012] NZACA 11 [pdf, 581 KB]

   ...certificate exams. For the Corporation, Mr Tui contended that the correct 2 assessment was carried out under s 62(1)(a), based on the earnings the appellant would have received on completion of his apprenticeship. [5] However, the last assessment form completed by the Corporation on 23 March 1992 was entitled "Loss of Potential Earnings s 63'; which raised another issue from the Authority's perspective, being whether s 63 was in fact applied and if so, was this the co...

7. Knight - Estate of Rewiti Te Rakaherea [2019] Chief Judge's MB 74 (2019 CJ 74) [pdf, 374 KB]

   ...or in the presentation of the facts of the case to the Court or the Registrar. The Chief Judge may only do so where he is of the opinion that it is necessary in the interests of justice to remedy the mistake or omission. [27] The applicant has requested that the Chief Judge amend the order that is the subject of this application. The burden of proof is on the applicant to prove the existence of the alleged mistake or omission either by the Court or in the presentation of evidence....

8. Gender-Pay-Gap-Action-Plan-2021-website.pdf [pdf, 506 KB]

   ...and 60% of leadership roles below tiers two and three are held by women. • More women employees are contacting the Ministry’s People Experience team seeking out leadership development advice aligned to their career development goals, such as requests for information and resources, courses, and specific career opportunities • There has been an increase in the number and quality of nominations for centrally funded development programmes as well as a steady increase in the uptake o...

9. DT v CI Ltd & QI Ltd [2023] NZDT 261 (24 March 2023) [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...RESPONDENT QI Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is adjourned. 2. The matter is to be set down before me on the next available day at 1:30pm. Reasons 1. Following the hearing on 3 March 2023 DT resubmitted all the information was she had provided for her claim. She had provided it in January but it did not get to the file by the time of the hearing into the [court]. It was a bundle of documents in support of her submission. I have now received and...

10. BN & NP v TT [2025] NZDT 9 (27 March 2025) [pdf, 89 KB]

    ...3. If TT wants to file a counterclaim it has to be heard at the same time as the claim so he will need to do that before Tuesday 01 April 2025. K Johnson Disputes Tribunal Referee 27 March 2025 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe