Search Results

1. Enforcement of Access Direction (s104) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...agency has not complied with the access direction or has not complied in full. The agency has not lodged an appeal within 20 working days from the date of the notice given to the parties under section 91(7) of the Privacy Act 2020. When to use this form Use this form when applying for an order requiring the agency to comply with the access direction under section 104 of the Privacy Act 2020. Completing this form • Print clearly in CAPITALS. Use a black pen or blue pen when completi...

2. [2025] NZEmpC 34  Xu v Pioneer Education and Immigration Services Group Ltd [pdf, 313 KB]

   ...today, majorly due to my limited time strength and capability, which cannot cater your needs of long-term career development. 3. I offered three-week full salary payments to cover up the notice period as a favor. Trust you will complete the request tasks as discussed today by the end of the period. If you complete the handovers at any time prior 28th of Jan 2020, your payments are still covered till the end and you are free to take a leave in due. 4. A reference letter will be...

3. [2006] NZEmpC AC 63/06 Whelan v Attorney-General for CE of the Children and Young Persons Service [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...were kind enough to indicate that once the Court had made findings they would be happy to carry out their calculations based on them. I accept that offer with alacrity and therefore will reserve the final figure for future lost earnings. I would request the figures be calculated by the actuaries, and hopefully agreed, with leave to apply to the Court if agreement proves impossible. The final figure will be higher than Mr Errington’s recalculations which he produced on 21 July 2...

4. [2021] NZEmpC 117 Zara’s Turkish Ltd (in liquidation) v Kocaturk [pdf, 378 KB]

   ...Zara’s Turkish also pleaded that Mrs Kocatürk’s personal grievance had not been raised within the time allowed under s 114(1) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act). A full hearing of the entire matter as it related to Mrs Kocatürk was requested. [23] Mr and Mrs Kocatürk challenged the determination. Mr Kocatürk placed in issue the decisions that: (a) between 13 October 2009 and 15 March 2010, he was employed by Mirac not Zara’s Turkish; 19 At [96] and [98...

5. [2023] NZEmpC 164 F & B Remuera Ltd v A Labour Inspector [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...alternative. [5] The plaintiff has applied for a stay of execution of the Authority’s determination and has also applied for an interim non-publication order. [6] I consider each application in turn. 1 A Labour Inspector v BRAK Burns Ltd (formerly Burgered Restaurants Auckland Ltd) [2023] NZERA 19 (Member Arthur). 2 At [27](i). 3 At [27](ii). 4 A Labour Inspector v BRAK Burns Ltd (formerly Burgered Restaurants Auckland Ltd) [2023] NZERA 30 (Member Arthur). 5 A...

6. [2014] NZEmpC 158 Whaanga v Sharp Services Limited [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...really going on. You are treating me like a fool, which is unfair and I have made it clear you are manager and you are responsible for the office. Wake up and stop pointing the finger at anyone but yourself. [16] By this stage Mrs Whaanga had formed the view that Mr Sharp did not want her to continue working at Sharp Services. This was unsurprising, and largely informed by her previous conversation with Mr Sharp and the note she had discovered on the company’s computer system...

7. Puriri – Okaihau No3C No2 (2013) 28 Takitimu MB 129 (28 TKT 129) [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...letter was received seeking the removal of Mr Puriri. 4 19 Tākitimu MB 98-109 (19 TKT 98-109) 5 28 Tākitimu MB 122-128 (28 TKT 122-128) 28 Tākitimu MB 132 [12] Mr Puriri then requested a judicial conference for the purpose of obtaining directions from the Court. Clearly from her correspondence Ms Cotter-Arlidge is also seeking directions and “clarification.” I understand from the case manager that there a...

8. Director of Proceedings v Thomson [2015] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...paragraph 2(a) below. A signed copy of the agreed facts is filed with this memorandum. The parties are agreed that it is not necessary for the Tribunal to consider any other evidence for the purpose of making the declaration sought. The parties request that the agreed summary of facts be published by the Tribunal as an addendum to the decision. 2. The plaintiff requests that the Tribunal exercise its jurisdiction in respect of the following matters: (a) A declaration pursuant to s 54...

9. [2017] NZEmpC 82 Judea Tavern Ltd v Jesson [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...Wades to contact her if they needed any further information. They did not. Rather, they responded to the first email as follows: Hi Pat Thank you for the update. Hope your leg is not too painful. Have filled in all the ACC information they requested and sent it back just now. Regards [9] The Wades did not take up the opportunity to ask for further information, or raise any concerns, nor did they respond in writing to any of Ms Jesson’s follow-up emails. [10] Shortly afte...

10. Otimi v Fa'uhiva - Hauhungaroa 1A3 (Poukura Pā) (2018) 394 Aota MB 182 (394 AOT 182) [pdf, 363 KB]

    ...with the kaumātua to discuss their concerns directly. The trustees replied but did not attend the meeting and a vote of no confidence in the trustees was subsequently carried at that meeting. The kaumātua advised the trustees of that vote and requested that the removal of trustees be placed on the agenda for consideration at the AGM. However, when the AGM was held, there was no opportunity for the issues to be raised and the chairperson “arbitrarily” closed the meeting. 3...