Search Results

1. Gollins v CAC 20002 [2014] NZREADT 52 [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...of Natural Justice? [51] It seems to be accepted that any breach of natural justice can be remedied by a de novo hearing before us. [52] The Authority does not accept that the licensee was denied the chance to be heard in respect of the matters forming the basis of the charges, or that there was any other failure to observe the rules of natural justice. [53] Prior to the Committee’s decision to lay charges, the Committee provided the licensee with detailed information received fro...

2. [2018] NZEmpC 82 Ovation NZ Ltd v The NZ Meat Workers Union & Anor [pdf, 260 KB]

   ...defendant contends that its members who are piece rate workers are not being provided with paid rest breaks, in contravention of s 69ZD of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act).2 The defendant pleads that the plaintiffs require work to be performed during breaks in the form of “doffing and stowing and sterilising equipment and gear and donning such equipment and gear for use”. The parties have referred to this matter as the “donning and doffing issue”. [5] That alle...

3. C Ltd v HN [2023] NZDT 451 (6 July 2023) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...on the stock car. 5. The issue to be resolved is whether either party breached the contract and if so, what the remedy for the breach should be? Did either party breach the contract and if so, what should the remedy be? 6 A contract is formed when parties decide to exchange something of value, creating an obligation to perform a particular duty that is legally enforceable. A contract is binding when the parties agree on clear and certain terms. The parties exchanged a paint job...

4. X Ltd v RU Ltd [2024] NZDT 882 (17 October 2024) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...agreed, with the sponsorship including a shirt sponsorship, and mentions on radio advertising. At the end of the season RU Ltd was invoiced. The sponsorship was renewed the following season, and in 2021 the sponsorship was widened to include a newly formed senior women’s team. In total the sponsorships covered the period 2019-2023. 3. The invoices were not paid, despite promises from HT. HT has subsequently been removed from his positions by RU Ltd for alleged wrongdoing. RU Ltd h...

5. [2023] NZREADT 32 UM v REAA (3 November 2023) [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...would have showed him the representation as to the net annual rent was not correct. He did not deliberately withhold them from the appellant, but carelessly sat on them without assessing them. The failure to analyse the bank statements and hence inform the appellant of the non-payment of rent amounted to a failure to exercise skill and diligence in regard to a significant feature of the property, being the actual rent paid in the recent past. This was a breach of r 5.1 of the Rules...

6. [2025] NZIACDT 04 EI v Liu (14 January 2025) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...employers needing workers for recovery work following floods. Mr Liu replied quoting a fee of $800 for each application. [6] Mr Liu then provided the agent with a link to a questionnaire and requested that each applicant fill in their personal information. The complainant completed the questionnaire on 7 March 2023. [7] RM, an associate of the agent, provided a file of supporting documents concerning the complainant to Mr Liu on 16 March 2023. This included a form required by...

7. [2024] NZIACDT 32 - XI v Liu (16 December 2024) [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...employers needing workers for recovery work following floods. Mr Liu replied quoting a fee of $800 for each application. [6] Mr Liu then provided the agent with a link to a questionnaire and requested that each applicant fill in their personal information. The complainant completed the questionnaire on 14 March 2023. [7] RM, an associate of the agent, provided a file of supporting documents concerning the complainant to Mr Liu on 16 March 2023. This included a form required b...

8. [2025] NZIACDT 05 – YI v Liu (14 January 2025) [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...employers needing workers for recovery work following floods. Mr Liu replied quoting a fee of $800 for each application. [6] Mr Liu then provided the agent with a link to a questionnaire and requested that each applicant fill in their personal information. The complainant completed the questionnaire on 7 March 2023. [7] RM, an associate of the agent, provided a file of supporting documents concerning the complainant to Mr Liu on 8 March 2023. This included a form required by...

9. [2025] NZIACDT 06 – DH v Liu (14 January 2025) [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...employers needing workers for recovery work following floods. Mr Liu replied quoting a fee of $800 for each application. [6] Mr Liu then provided the agent with a link to a questionnaire and requested that each applicant fill in their personal information. The complainant completed the questionnaire on 30 March 2023. [7] RM, an associate of the agent, provided a file of supporting documents concerning the complainant to Mr Liu on 30 March 2023. This included a form required b...

10. AB v IJ, OBO and EF LCRO 203/2014 (29 August 2016) [pdf, 312 KB]

    ...[IJ]’s frustrations were expressed in an email8 to Ms [CK], a partner in the firm to whom he had directed his complaints about matters relating to the Estate. He says: Why the hell does [LW] not have to respond to [Law Firm A]’s and [EF]’s requests?????????? The request to sign the house over to [EF] has been ignored for over seven months. This is just a continuation of the constant frustration we have encountered to date and the reason I have documented my total displeasure t...