Search Results

1. [2014] NZEmpC 109 Hixon (Labour Inspector) & Collins v Campbell Ors interlocutory [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...3 put before us, that reasonable efforts have been made to serve Mr and Mrs Campbell but these have been unsuccessful. We are satisfied that the proceedings will have come to their notice by sending them to the Post Office Box as Mr Campbell requested. [13] We make an order accordingly, that is that service was effected on the first and third defendants on 21 June 2014, the date of probable receipt of the documents in the Post Office Box. The one condition that will attach to th...

2. ABH v ZYV Ltd [2013] NZDT 37 (28 May 2013) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...home and repair her blinds is unreasonable. Can ZYV Ltd’s charge ABH a late payment fee? [12] ZYV Ltd has sought to charge ABH a $20.00 late payment fee. The terms of the agreement between the parties crystallised when the contract was formed. This was when ZYV Ltd agreed to repair ABH’s blinds. At that point, charges had not been discussed and no reference was made to a late payment fee. For this reason, I find that payment of a late payment fee was not part of the ag...

3. [2022] NZEnvC 023 Karmakar v Auckland Council [pdf, 732 KB]

   ...Roskill, Auckland 1041, for additional residential units as a permitted activity under the City of Auckland Unitary Plan, subject to compliance with the relevant development controls. [2] In a memorandum filed in support of the application, Mr Karmakar requests the Court to approve: the proposed plan for additional houses in one of the properties (exhibit "B") within the national grid yard. The applicant will then apply for the resource consent to the Auckland Council based...

4. Steedman v Apatu - Owhaoko D6 Subdn 3 (2015) 341 Aotea MB 164 (341 AOT 164) [pdf, 372 KB]

   ...met. Counsel says that the standard Auckland District Law Society sale and purchase agreement does not provide for witnessing and accordingly that agreement has not been witnessed. However, counsel pointed out that the Authority & Instruction Forms (“A & I Forms”) have been signed and witnessed consistent with r 11.10 of the Rules. Counsel added that the trustee who signed the sale and purchase agreement did so with the authority of the other trustees and both the appli...

5. O v CAC 10028 & T [2011] NZREADT 15 [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...The CAC accepts that Mr O does not choose to display website addresses in order to make the buyers ring him directly. Continued to advertise their property after the agency agreement ended The CAC accepts that Mr O removed the advertising when requested by the Ts but in future should be aware of his advertising and marketing obligations under the Professional Conduct and Client Care Rules 2009. Was misleading in the use of statistics in his own advertising In the CAC’s view...

6. FB v WBOPSC2 LCRO 184 / 2010 (26 August 2011) [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...to release the new information. He considered that the referral to the Disciplinary Tribunal was an unjust outcome, and that there was no certainty about what the charges were to be. He considered that no misconduct had been identified despite requests from him as to what rule had been broken. Review [6] The Practitioner sought to be heard on his review application and an Applicant- Only hearing was arranged for 6 July 2011. This may be a first step in an LCRO review to ascerta...

7. NH v QM [2023] NZDT 487 (28 August 2023) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...$1,824.00 to NH on or before 17 October 2023. Reasons: 1. NH was invited by QM to join a poker club named the CM. The club was run as a private “room” hosted by QM on an online gambling site. QM, who took a cut (“raked the pot”) in the form of virtual gold coins for organising the group, would collect the money and pay the winners. 2. On 17 April 2023, NH lost $1,824.00 gambling in the club, and paid this sum to QM, who paid the winners. The next day, NH won $11,200.00, but Q...

8. Baker & Baker v CAC 416 & Drumm [2019] NZREADT 34 (12 August 2019) [pdf, 315 KB]

   ...Mr and Mrs Baker complained that the Agency should have been more upfront about the criteria (if they existed at the time they listed and sold their property) and the Agency should honour their promise. Mr Drumm’s response [35] Mr Drumm was requested to respond to the complaint both generally, and to specific issues. [36] Mr Drumm said that at the time of listing, Mr and Mrs Baker had been on the market for some time with another agent and had not received any offers, and exp...

9. [2024] NZEmpC 226 Glenfield College BOT & Ors v Anderson [pdf, 365 KB]

   ...of work. [18] Not surprisingly, Mrs Anderson was very upset when she received this letter. She sent an email to Mr McKinley on 14 September 2020 noting that he had still not provided answers to the questions she had raised at the meeting, and requested that he do so. [19] Mr McKinley responded on 17 September 2020 saying that he was happy to provide a response to the questions she had asked; he assured her that he had carefully considered the matters she had raised before deci...

10. [2024] NZEmpC 226 Glenfield College BOT & Ors v Anderson [pdf, 272 KB]

    ...of work. [18] Not surprisingly, Mrs Anderson was very upset when she received this letter. She sent an email to Mr McKinley on 14 September 2020 noting that he had still not provided answers to the questions she had raised at the meeting, and requested that he do so. [19] Mr McKinley responded on 17 September 2020 saying that he was happy to provide a response to the questions she had asked; he assured her that he had carefully considered the matters she had raised before deci...