Search Results

1. SM v UU Ltd [2022] NZDT 159 (15 December 2022) [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...seen in the water tank. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 6 [17] NC provides other explanations for the damage including direct action by third parties trying to steal water or other nefarious reasons to be on top of SM’s water tank. NC later formed the view that the more likely explanation is subsidence. NC has visited the property and notes the water tank is by a bowed retaining wall, likely placed on fill rather than a firm base as recommended, and the wall of the tank has pulling...

2. Form 27 Fixed Fees J [pdf, 290 KB]

   Templates V12 – August 2017 page 1 08/17 form 27 Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedule J Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Provider number Firm number Court type High Court Court of Appeal Parole Board Court location Details of cl...

3. Form 27 Fixed Fees J [pdf, 126 KB]

   Templates V12 – August 2017 page 1 08/17 form 27 Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedule J Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Provider number Firm number Court High Court Court of Appeal Parole Board Court location Details of claim D...

4. PDLA Form 13 Holiday Period Invoice (2023) [pdf, 279 KB]

   page 1 12/20 form 13 Tax Invoice Invoice date Invoice number GST number Police Detention Legal Assistance Scheme (PDLA)- Holiday period roster To: Legal Aid, PO Box/DX City Name of PDLA lawyer Provider number Name of law firm Postal address Personal attendance If claiming for rostered PDLA holiday period shift, enter details on the next page Police Station (or other location attended) Name of assisted person Type of offence eg assault, EBA Was this case? Tick if...

5. Ward [2011] NZWHT Auckland 69 [pdf, 82 KB]

   ...“built”. [8] Lang J also considered the effect of s43(1) of the Building Act 1991 which provides as follows: 43 Code compliance certificate (1) An owner shall as soon as practicable advise the territorial authority, in the prescribed form, that the building work has been completed to the extent required by the building consent issued in respect of that building work. [9] He concluded that if this reasoning is applied to the consideration of the built-by dat...

6. LCRO 158/2019 RL v BN, TG and VK (1 April 2021) [pdf, 604 KB]

   ...had been provided with negligent advice by [JPBN] and advised to advance a counterclaim when that claim had little prospect of success. (b) She had not been advised at commencement as to the potential cost of the proceedings. (c) She had made request for a full account of time spent on her file, but this had not been provided. By way of outcome, Ms RL made request for [JPBN] to be investigated. 3 Subsequent to filing her initial complaint, Ms RL expanded on her complaint in...

7. FN v PL [2023] NZDT 681 (20 December 2023) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 681 APPLICANT FN RESPONDENT PL The Tribunal orders: PL is to pay $400.00 to FN on or before 31 January 2024. Reasons 1. FN and PL were formerly friends/friendly acquaintances. FN says that in 2022 he loaned $400 to PL, paying it to him via internet banking payment around August 2022. The loan amount was repaid by PL the next day. FN says that in setting up the internet banking pa

8. EX v O Ltd [2024] NZDT 514 (16 July 2024) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...apply to this contract. 4. Section 6 of the Act implies a guarantee into every sale to a consumer that the good must be of acceptable quality. Section 7 of the Act provides that the Tribunal must take into account a wide variety of contextual information when determining if the good is of acceptable quality. It states that the good must be acceptable in appearance and finish and be free from minor defects. 5. EX said the bike bag was sold to him with a defect. He said that he did...

9. [2012] NZEmpC 189 Haig v Carrington Farms & Ors [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...causes of action are struck out as having been brought in breach of the limitation period in s 142 Employment Relations Act 2000. B The first defendant’s counterclaims (except those causes of action in breach of contract for concealment of information) are struck out as having been brought in breach of the limitation period in s 142 Employment Relations Act 2000. REASONS OF THE COURT Introduction [1] All parties say that the claims against them were issued out of time and,

10. X Ltd v K Ltd [2019] NZDT 1339 (19 December 2019) [pdf, 252 KB]

    ...and advised: “Hi [redacted]- Apologies for the delay in getting back to you. Packing is scheduled for Monday through Tuesday next week. Our Head of Quality has picked up a statement on your label – Complies with USFDA Do you have any information to support this claim? FDA registration #? Thanks [redacted]” 7. Before any reply was received, K Ltd sent a further email: Hi [redacted]- See attached letter from our Head of Quality. Unfortunately the label claim has pot...