BT v OS LCRO 2/2013 (17 November 2014) [pdf, 81 KB]
...BT emailed OS’s office to say that he did not intend to continue in occupation under the lease after 31 December 2010, that he was selling his business, and inviting GD to consider purchasing his fit-out of her premises. On behalf of GD, OS requested further information, which BT provided. Negotiations continued without the parties reaching agreement. [9] On 16 December 2010, as he had not secured GD’s agreement to buy his fit-out, BT began to remove his fit-out from the lease...