Search Results

1. [2013] NZEmpC 125 Flight Attendants & Related Services (NZ) Assoc v Air New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...parties before the Court. [44] I do not interpret s 178(2)(c) as requiring a precise identity of respondent parties in both forums. There are many examples in the Act of disputes (to use that term non-technically) that can be brought by different forms of litigation depending on the identity of the persons bringing them or against whom they are brought. Frequent examples involve unions and their members who are employees of an employer. Some sorts of proceedings must be brought b...

2. Chen v Gu-Chang [2013] NZIACDT 56 (30 August 2013) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...be considered by the Tribunal. The factors Ms Gu-Chang has put forward to resist the loss or suspension of her licence must be considered. [36] Ms Gu-Chang points to her good standing and provides examples of clients who are satisfied with her performance. They are important considerations; however, when a person commits a professional disciplinary offence involving dishonesty, it is of limited value to say they have dealt honestly with other clients. I accept there is only one matter be...

3. [2025] NZEmpC 16 The Chief of New Zealand Defence Force v Williams [pdf, 305 KB]

   ...NZERA 631 (Member Tan). [2] Warren Williams, Nicholas Shearer and Allan Finn claimed that the hours of work clauses in their individual employment agreements (IEAs) were availability provisions which required them to be available to perform work in addition to their guaranteed hours. They claimed these provisions were not compliant with the requirements of s 67D of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act) because they did not provide for reasonable compensation.2 [3] N...

4. [2016] NZEmpC 165 Lawson v NZ Transport Agency [pdf, 463 KB]

   ...…………………… [198] Mr Pearks’ provisional conclusions ………………………………………………. [212] Interview with Mr Van Heiningen ………………………………………………….. [219] Mr Lawson’s OIA request of 8 May 2014 …………………………………………. [230] Outcomes meeting of 14 May 2014 ………………………………………………… [234] Non-disclosure of the notes of interview with Mr Van Heiningen ……...

5. Skipper v Skipper - Awanui Haparapara 9 Block (2017) 159 Waiariki MB 3 (159 WAR 3) [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...Ms Eru a licence to occupy, as her brothers are unlikely to grant such a licence given their conflict of interest as trustees. Ms Insley noted that John Skipper intended to apply for an occupation order in 2004 and even completed an application form, although it was never lodged with the Court. Ms Insley says the application sought an area of occupation of two acres, rather than the 1200 square metres provided for in the existing licence. She submits that there were sufficient sh...

6. Karepa v Te Riini - The Kikorangi and Kareti Karepa Whānau Trust (2016) 138 Waiariki MB 134 (138 WAR 134) [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...you represent having done that to Ms Te Riini? R Karepa: No. P Marshall: Have any of those communications being made to any of the other trustees? R Karepa: Like I said I live in Auckland. P Marshall: Okay. Is it fair to say that if no requests were made there’s been no refusal to provide information? R Karepa: No because at the same time we were running our own meetings. [34] What I take from the evidence is that, rather than the applicants not being provided info...

7. David Bain report of Hon Ian Binnie QC on compensation claim amended [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   REPORT FOR THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE ON COMPENSATION CLAIM BY DAVID CULLEN BAIN BY HON IAN BINNIE QC 30 August 2012 (supplemented in response to questions raised by the Minister at our meeting of 13 September 2012) - ii - Table of Contents MANDATE AND METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................ 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................

8. David Bain report of Hon Ian Binnie QC on compensation claim supplementary [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   REPORT FOR THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE ON COMPENSATION CLAIM BY DAVID CULLEN BAIN BY HON IAN BINNIE QC 30 August 2012 (supplemented in response to questions raised by the Minister at our meeting of 13 September 2012) - ii - Table of Contents MANDATE AND METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................ 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................

9. LCRO 28/2021 RW v BD and Law Firm A (3 May 2022) [pdf, 330 KB]

   ...are: i. Mr BD disputes that Mr RW instructed him that he wanted to protect his contribution to the purchase in the event that he and Ms SL separated. Ms EC says that this is supported by the fact that Mr RW signed the Authority and Instruction form to register the transfer of the property, which records that he and Ms SL would be registered as joint tenants. ii. Draft wills were prepared and sent to Mr RW and Ms SL in which they appointed each other as executor of their wills a...

10. [2018] NZEnvC 079 Maungaharuru Tangitu Trust v Hastings District Council [pdf, 2.4 MB]

    ...that in both the notified and decisions versions of the PDP, the permitted activities on waahi tapu and waahi taonga sites were very limited. Other than the maintenance, replacement or repair of existing utilities (which were subject to General Performance Standards) and the maintenance of existing farm fences and tracks, all other farming activities had (full) discretionary status - ie there were no other permitted, controlled or even restricted discretionary activities. What is no...