Search Results

1. [2021] NZACC 5 - Andrews v ACC (12 January 2021) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...concussions from motor/dirt bike accidents in the past and that he recovered quickly and completely from these. [17] The interface between the appellant and the Corporation from this point on becomes somewhat disjointed. [18] There was a request for a referral to Burwood Hospital for a concussion clinic referral on 3 March 2013. [19] The branch medical advisor noted that no head injury was reported at the initial emergency department assessment and the clinical notes said, ...

2. [2022] NZACC 25 - Teavae v ACC (1 march 2022) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...Consultant Neurologist in London, assessed Ms Teavae and noted that she was continuing to experience epilepsy: Her attacks have always been minor in character. She has never had a grand mal convulsion. At present, most of her attacks consist of a form of absence in which her mind is described as being out of control. However, she is aware of her surrounding and understands what people say, it is a question of not being able to speak herself. She is not certain whether or not she...

3. E v IAG New Zealand Ltd (No 4) [2022] CEIT-2019-0013 [pdf, 535 KB]

   ...these assumptions affected the weight given to the evidence. IAG asserts that the mistakes are indisputable, are objectively ascertainable, and are central to the disposition of the quantum issues. It is asserted that the decision in its current form does not accord IAG natural justice or procedural fairness. IAG says that the decision should be reissued after taking into consideration the evidence excluded or mis-weighted, and rewriting the identified paragraphs. IAG relies upo...

4. Zhang v Deng [2012] NZIACDT 26 (31 May 2012) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...that. The complaint is a statutory process. Being a professional disciplinary matter, there are public interest issues arising. A complaint which has been lodged with the Tribunal is not solely an inter partes matter. The Tribunal will consider a request to withdraw a complaint, but it is not the complainant’s right to do so. [10] This Tribunal, as is commonly the case for professional disciplinary tribunals, has an inquisitorial function. The Tribunal is not dependent on a compla...

5. Jia v Wang [2011] NZIACDT 30 (19 September 2011) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...the factual matters in issue and the potential conclusions that could be reached on the papers before the Tribunal. The parties were given an opportunity to respond. [5] The parties responded. However, the responses did not provide sufficient information to determine the contention; an oral hearing was convened. As the Tribunal’s process is inquisitorial, the parties were directed to the issues the Tribunal considered needed to be addressed. [6] Both the Adviser and the Complainant...

6. O v I [2018] NZIACDT 23 (18 June 2018) [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...within 15 working days of the issue of this decision. [39.2] Mr I’s representatives may file a reply within a further 10 working days. [39.3] Any party may apply to vary the timetable. Publication of the adviser’s name [40] The Registrar is requested to indicate whether in her view Mr I’s identity should be published. The Complainant and Mr I’s representatives may of course also take a position on this matter. [41] The name or information that may identify Mr I, the comp...

7. Manaena-Biddle v Biddle-Bassett - Te Atuareretahi (2019) 223 Waiariki MB 182 (223 WAR 182) [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...being made to Kaitoa Logging. The report also states that on 28 February 2018 the trustees approved that the second harvest to be removed from the land, citing e-mails from Awhi Biddle as evidence. [14] The report concluded that, based on the information Fishers Quay was given, the total costs to be reimbursed to Kaitoa Logging is $11,425.00. In terms of remittances 4 217 Waiariki MB 25-32 (217 WAR 25-32) 223 Waiarik...

8. [2022] NZACC 110 – Hunter v ACC (9 June 2022) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...found evidence of left ulnar neuropathy at the elbow but no evidence of ulnar neuropathy at the wrist. [16] On 18 September 2018, Mr Hadlow assessed Mr Hunter again and lodged an assessment report and treatment plan (ARTP) with the Corporation, requesting funding for a left ulnar nerve decompression/transposition operation. The formal diagnosis was listed as left ulna neuritis secondary to cubital tunnel syndrome. Mr Hadlow noted the accident in March 2007, and stated that there...

9. [2024] NZREADT 05 CAC v Pang (6 March 2024) [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...parallels drawn by the Committee’s counsel to other decisions seems inappropriate to him. [24] Mr Pang sincerely accepts the mistake he made and acknowledges the gravity of the situation. He takes full responsibility. However, he finds the request to cover 50 per cent of the costs to be unjustified. He provided all the evidence available to him. He disputes the claim that he lacked meaningful engagement as he co-operated and provided thorough details to the Committee. He is...

10. Wellington Standards Committee 1 v McCardle [2025] NZLCDT 3 (10 January 2025) [pdf, 624 KB]

    ...Officer about the timetable. DATED at AUCKLAND this 10th day of January 2025 Dr J G Adams Deputy Chairperson 11 Appendix A Particulars 7, 8 and 9 7. At the February Meeting: (a) the Practitioner requested Mr S sign a Deed of Indemnity and Release (the Deed) which: i. imposed on Mr S the obligation to distribute the funds remaining in the Estate ($130,000) in accordance with the Will; and ii. released the Practitioner and the Firm fr...