Search Results

1. Skerrett-White - Allotments 302 - 315 town of Richmond and Richmond Township Allotments 18 - 20 (2013) 2013 Chief Judge's MB 473 (2013 CJ 473) [pdf, 393 KB]

   ...Taheke Marae, and the others lands, while vested in the same trustees, did not have the same specificity of purpose, as noted above. The 1991 orders [31] On 28 February 1991 Donald Mairangi Bennett made an application to the Māori Land Court requesting that the lands known as Town of Richmond 302-315 and 324, and 18 be vested in Bertram Ikatapu Kingi and Donald Mairangi Bennett as trustees upon the grounds that the “present trustees are deceased and a meeting of the Okere Incorpo...

2. [2015] NZSSAA 84 (13 November 2015) [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...June or July 2005 (the time of the XXXX Road incident) and their relationship ended at that point. In addition, there were occasions prior to that when Mr XXXX had left for short periods of a few weeks. [26] There are two independent sources of information about when Mr XXXX lived away from 25 XXXX Avenue. The first is contained in Police reports. The second is the evidence contained in Mr XXXX’s bank statements. [27] The Police reports give an insight into both the timing of Mr...

3. [2020] NZEmpC 225 Davis v Idea Services Ltd [pdf, 368 KB]

   ...challenging behaviour of service users. [5] It is pleaded for Ms Davis that ISL acted unjustifiably and/or breached these terms by: a) failing to have the service user’s disability treatment and care reassessed prior to November 2016, as requested by Ms Davis; 1 Davis v Idea Services Ltd [2019] NZERA 610 (Member Loftus). 2 The term of the IEA placed before the Court was from 21 October 2014 to 20 October 2016. Both parties proceeded on the basis that this was the operativ...

4. [2020] NZIACDT 31 TOD v Registrar of Immigration Advisers (20 July 2020) [pdf, 318 KB]

   ...written agreement for the filing of a new work visa application. [5] On 20 April 2018, the adviser lodged the appellant’s work visa application. An interim visa valid for six months was issued by Immigration New Zealand. [6] The agency requested further information from the adviser on 4 May 2018, which he produced on 11 May 2018. Immigration New Zealand then sought additional information on 14 May 2018, giving the adviser until 18 May to respond. The adviser sought the in...

5. Peters v Wellington Combined Shuttles (Application by Defendant that Jurisdiction be Declined) [2013] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...been lodged with the Human Rights Commission. For present purposes it is necessary to set out only ss 75 and 76 of the Act: 75 Object of this Part The object of this Part is to establish procedures that— (a) facilitate the provision of information to members of the public who have questions about discrimination; and (b) recognise that disputes about compliance with Part 1A or Part 2 are more likely to be successfully resolved if those disputes can be resolved promptly by the part...

6. PC8 Urban Common Bundle - Volume 5 (Part 1) [pdf, 28 MB]

   ...Otago as well as consultation with, and input from, the Otago whänau and röpü groups and Southland and South Canterbury Rünaka. The KTKO NRMP 2005 utilises the geographic boundaries of the Otago Regional Council2 to give a focus to the Plan unless requested to do otherwise by one of the Papatipu Rünanga that comprises Kai Tahu ki Otago. However, it is important to acknowledge that these “artificial” boundary lines do not align with those of custom and tradition of whänau and hapü,...

7. [2020] NZEnvC 188 NZ Fairy Tern Charitable Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 503 KB]

   ...enforcement orders by New Zealand Fairy Tern Charitable Trust (the Trust) and subsequent concerns by the Court to achieve protection of the NZ Fairy Tern. This relates to a dam situated on land jointly owned (as to the bed of the stream by Land Information NZ (LINZ) and as to the banks by the Department of Conservation (DoC)). [2] It is not necessary or helpful to go through the full terms of the decision of this Court, but I do note that after the original Decision 1 there was an app...

8. [2022] NZEnvC 247 Country Lifestyles Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 441 KB]

   ................................................................................................................... 6 The Court’s powers on appeal .................................................................................................................... 8 Auckland Unitary Plan information requirements .............................................................................. 9 Return of application .................................................................................

9. [2017] NZEmpC 96 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd Interlocutory judgment (No 23) [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...unsurprising that there were updates given to the regional office, as would be unexceptional in 15 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 127. respect of a network of companies forming a large multi-national, as is the case in this instance. [86] Secondly, Mr Scampion referred to evidence given by Mr Jacob Roest, General Manager of LSG NZ, at a hearing before Judge Travis on 11 April 2011. 16 The evide...

10. BD & ND v Southern Response Earthquakes Services Ltd [2022] CEIT-2020-0015 [pdf, 381 KB]

    ...not compliant with building regulations. [2] The applicants live at XXXXXXX. Their home is a 1920’s California style bungalow. The house and its surrounds present a picture of a quintessentially Christchurch character suburb, houses of a uniform architectural style on a leafy, oak-lined street. The aesthetic values of the neighbourhood have been deemed worthy of protection by Christchurch City Council and it has been classified as a character area. [3] The house was damaged...