Search Results

1. Proactive release - Security Information in Proceedings Legislation Bill.pdf [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   © Crown Copyright, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Hon Kris Faafoi Minister of Justice Proactive release – Security Information in Proceedings Legislation Bill Date of issue: 7 December 2021 The following documents have been proactively released. Some information has been withheld on the basis that it would not, if requested under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA), be released. Where that is the case, the relevant section of the OIA has been note

2. 2017 NZSSAA 042 (24 July 2017) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...submissions by 9 November 2016 in response to the Ministry’s Section 12K Report and supplementary report filed on 5 August 2016. 2 [5] On 22 November 2016 the case manager wrote to Ms XXXX noting that she had not provided the submissions requested by the Authority and advised Ms XXXX that if her submissions were not filed by Tuesday 29 November 2016 the matter would be determined. [6] On 29 November 2016 the Authority received an e-mail from Peter Eastgate, coun...

3. UN v DT [2024] NZDT 844 (11 November 2024) [pdf, 251 KB]

   ...a test drive, UN agreed to purchase the vehicle conditional on a pre-purchase inspection. 12. Later the same day UN phoned DT and asked him if he would take the vehicle to V Ltd being [Car’s brand] specialists to be inspected. 13. UN informed DT that he had a good relationship with V Ltd as they had previously serviced his [redacted] vehicles. He said that historically V Ltd were aware of the vehicle as they had sold the vehicle to the original owner when it was first sold in N...

4. Deputy Registrar - Utakura 7 Block (2010) 7 Taitokerau MB 71 (7 TTK 71) [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...road, may have been enacted in part to fill the perceived “gap” in the law arising from the doctrine of dedication not applying to Maori land. Certainly, it was enacted to address the common problem of roads being shown on plans of Maori land, formed and used by the public but without any legal basis (see my discussion below in relation to Re Part Lot 28B Parish of Rangitaiki (1979) 6 Waiariki Appellate MB 20 (6 AP 20)). Set out below is s 321 of the 1993 Act: 321 Land that ha...

5. [2012] NZEmpC 168 Service and Food Workers Union Nga Ringa Tota Inc v Sanford Ltd [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...bargaining or the authority of the other in the bargaining; and 4 Inserted by s 10 of the Employment Relations Amendment Act (No 2) 2004. (e) the union and employer must provide to each other, on request and in accordance with section 34, information that is reasonably necessary to support or substantiate claims or responses to claims made for the purposes of the bargaining. (2) Subsection (1)(b) does not require a union and an...

6. LCRO 213/2015 HY Trust v AK and GJ (21 Janaury 2019) [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...are not indefeasible, and that point was reserved for argument at trial. [27] Mr GJ says he obtained third party discovery from the firm that had acted for Mr MN in the 1990s. When he examined those documents in preparation for trial, Mr GJ formed the view that “what the Trust had done amounted to land transfer fraud”. [28] Mr GJ tested his view with two other lawyers. He consulted Ms Foster, a barrister who had authored texts that traversed the subject of land transfer fr...

7. Barcello v Barcello - Succession to Mary Barcello (2024) 91 Te Waipounamu MB 77 (91 TWP 77) [pdf, 329 KB]

   ...in Mary at one and the same time. 32 Above n 4. 91 Te Waipounamu MB 96 [49] Examining the transaction between Mark and Sharon, as trustees, and Mary as recipient of the shares, I consider that the signing of the various application forms filed with the court simultaneously clearly show an expectation that the trustees were transferring the shares to Mary with the express expectation that she would then transfer them onwards to Mark and Sharon as individuals, so that the...

8. Taipari v Hauraki Maori Trust Board (2008) 114 Hauriki MB 34 (114 H 34) [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...of the ratification process. A copy of the opinion was not given to the elected reps or the iwi of Hauraki either prior to or at the ratification hui on 8 July 2006. [10] Mr Taipari, for the elected reps gave evidence that he passed on the information that a 75% vote in favour was required in both the postal vote and hui vote to many tangata whenua at meetings of the Ngati Maru Runanga, the Marutuahu Whanui and his own whanau. That information was passed on further by people atten...

9. Karanga v Karanga - Mangamuka East H2 (2006) 112 Whangarei MB 23 (112 WH 23) [pdf, 1.9 MB]

   ...$22,000, installed a septic tank and a flush toilet, metalled the road and unde11aken £lU1her work necessary to make the garage liveable. [9] In April 2006 Fred Karanga engaged Ms Afa, a solicitor, who wrote to Robina Karanga and Jacko Rihari to request that they leave the property by 31 May 2006. Robina Karanga indicated that she was willing to leave the property when she was able to find alternative accommodation. She has not found altemative accommodation and remains in the ga...

10. [2020] NZEmpC 218 EPB Ltd v OST [pdf, 217 KB]

    ...prohibiting publication cannot be treated in isolation from OST’s application for leave extending the time for commencement of a challenge. The reason for this is that if the application for leave is granted, OST would then need to file a statement of claim commencing the challenge (she has filed a draft document in support of the application at this stage). The filing of the statement of claim would then entitle EPB to file a statement of defence and require the challenge to be...