Search Results

1. AX Ltd v ZC Ltd [2014] NZDT 673 (27 February 2014) [pdf, 29 KB]

   ...network. AA submitted that in establishing an account with ZC Limited and charging a fee there is a standard residential demand that is calculated and accepted as the demand for that account. He argues that that has not changed with the company now requesting connection to the network. He also argues that the increased demand provision is directed towards commercial activity which can change dramatically, unlike residential use which is reasonably confined. [8] I do not accept AA...

2. Dixon v Dixon [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...also no evidence that Mr Wellington undertook any inspection or took part in the supervision of the construction. Mr Wellington was also not shown to have personally assumed responsibility for any part of the project apart from signing the form. The Tribunal was therefore not satisfied that it was desirable to join Mr Wellington. The application was therefore declined. AHI Roofing Ltd Key Homes filed an application to join AHI Roofing Ltd on the grounds that it constructed the...

3. Apostolakis v Attorney-General No.1 (Consolidation Refused) [2017] NZHRRT 46 [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...hearing which took place on 9 March 2017. These delays speak for themselves. [7.4] Consolidation will serve no useful purpose. [8] As to the proceedings in HRRT046/17: Apostolakis v Public Trust, Mrs Apostolakis alleges an information privacy request by her was not responded to in a manner which complied with the Privacy Act 1993. The Public Trust denies this allegation and protests the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. It has applied to have the proceedings struck out. In a Minute iss...

4. Apostolakis v Attorney-General No.3 (Consolidation Refused) [2017] NZHRRT 48 [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...which took place on 9 March 2017. These delays speak for themselves. [7.4] Consolidation will serve no useful purpose. 3 [8] As to the proceedings in HRRT046/17: Apostolakis v Public Trust, Mrs Apostolakis alleges an information privacy request by her was not responded to in a manner which complied with the Privacy Act 1993. The Public Trust denies this allegation and protests the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. It has applied to have the proceedings struck out. In a Minute iss...

5. [2018] NZEmpC 80 Avondale College Board of Trustees v Maday [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...2000 (the Act), being $25,000 for each of two established grievances, to Mrs Catriona Maday.1 [2] Mrs Maday also sought lost wages as a consequence of dismissal. The Authority directed the representatives to confer on issues pertaining to that claim, and indicated that on receipt of the information which was requested, it would issue a 1 Maday v Avondale College Board of Trustees [2018] NZERA Auckland 131. further determin...

6. Waikato-River-Authority.pdf [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...Farmlands Limited (“the Appellant”) in respect of the decisions on Proposed Plan Change 1 (“PPC1”) to the Waikato Regional Plan, which were publicly notified on 22 April 2020 (“the Decisions Version”). 2. The WRA is the statutory body formed under the Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010, the Ngati Tuwharetoa, Raukawa, and Te Arawa River Iwi Waikato River Act 2010, and with additional responsibilities arising under the Nga Wai o Maniapoto (...

7. Waikato-River-Authority.pdf [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...Growers Association (“the Appellant”) in respect of the decisions on Proposed Plan Change 1 (“PPC1”) to the Waikato Regional Plan, which were publicly notified on 22 April 2020 (“the Decisions Version”). 2. The WRA is the statutory body formed under the Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010, the Ngati Tuwharetoa, Raukawa, and Te Arawa River Iwi Waikato River Act 2010, and with additional responsibilities arising under the Nga Wai o Maniapoto...

8. Waikato River Authority.pdf [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...Horticulture New Zealand (“the Appellant”) in respect of the decisions on Proposed Plan Change 1 (“PPC1”) to the Waikato Regional Plan, which were publicly notified on 22 April 2020 (“the Decisions Version”). 2. The WRA is the statutory body formed under the Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010, the Ngati Tuwharetoa, Raukawa, and Te Arawa River Iwi Waikato River Act 2010, and with additional responsibilities arising under the Nga Wai o Mani...

9. Waikato-River-Authority.pdf [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...Farming Limited (“the Appellant”) in respect of the decisions on Proposed Plan Change 1 (“PPC1”) to the Waikato Regional Plan, which were publicly notified on 22 April 2020 (“the Decisions Version”). 2. The WRA is the statutory body formed under the Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010, the Ngati Tuwharetoa, Raukawa, and Te Arawa River Iwi Waikato River Act 2010, and with additional responsibilities arising under the Nga Wai o Maniapoto (Wa...

10. Waikato-River-Authority.pdf [pdf, 183 KB]

    ...Management Limited (“the Appellant”) in respect of the decisions on Proposed Plan Change 1 (“PPC1”) to the Waikato Regional Plan, which were publicly notified on 22 April 2020 (“the Decisions Version”). 2. The WRA is the statutory body formed under the Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010, the Ngati Tuwharetoa, Raukawa, and Te Arawa River Iwi Waikato River Act 2010, and with additional responsibilities arising under the Nga Wai o Maniapoto...