Search Results

1. Waikato-River-Authority.pdf [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...New Zealand Inc (“the Appellant”) in respect of the decisions on Proposed Plan Change 1 (“PPC1”) to the Waikato Regional Plan, which were publicly notified on 22 April 2020 (“the Decisions Version”). 2. The WRA is the statutory body formed under the Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010, the Ngati Tuwharetoa, Raukawa, and Te Arawa River Iwi Waikato River Act 2010, and with additional responsibilities arising under the Nga Wai o Maniapoto (Wa...

2. Waikato River Authority.pdf [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...Waipā River Iwi (“the Appellant”) in respect of the decisions on Proposed Plan Change 1 (“PPC1”) to the Waikato Regional Plan, which were publicly notified on 22 April 2020 (“the Decisions Version”). 2. The WRA is the statutory body formed under the Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010, the Ngati Tuwharetoa, Raukawa, and Te Arawa River Iwi Waikato River Act 2010, and with additional responsibilities arising under the Nga Wai o Maniapoto (W...

3. Waikato River Authority.pdf [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...District Council (“the Appellant”) in respect of the decisions on Proposed Plan Change 1 (“PPC1”) to the Waikato Regional Plan, which were publicly notified on 22 April 2020 (“the Decisions Version”). 2. The WRA is the statutory body formed under the Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010, the Ngati Tuwharetoa, Raukawa, and Te Arawa River Iwi Waikato River Act 2010, and with additional responsibilities arising under the Nga Wai o Maniapoto (W...

4. Waikato River Authority.pdf [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...Agri-Nutrients Limited (“the Appellant”) in respect of the decisions on Proposed Plan Change 1 (“PPC1”) to the Waikato Regional Plan, which were publicly notified on 22 April 2020 (“the Decisions Version”). 2. The WRA is the statutory body formed under the Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010, the Ngati Tuwharetoa, Raukawa, and Te Arawa River Iwi Waikato River Act 2010, and with additional responsibilities arising under the Nga Wai o Maniap...

5. Waikato River Authority.pdf [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...Zealand Incorporated (“the Appellant”) in respect of the decisions on Proposed Plan Change 1 (“PPC1”) to the Waikato Regional Plan, which were publicly notified on 22 April 2020 (“the Decisions Version”). 2. The WRA is the statutory body formed under the Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010, the Ngati Tuwharetoa, Raukawa, and Te Arawa River Iwi Waikato River Act 2010, and with additional responsibilities arising under the Nga Wai o Maniapoto...

6. Waikato-River-Authority.pdf [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...Zealand Limited (“the Appellant”) in respect of the decisions on Proposed Plan Change 1 (“PPC1”) to the Waikato Regional Plan, which were publicly notified on 22 April 2020 (“the Decisions Version”). 2. The WRA is the statutory body formed under the Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010, the Ngati Tuwharetoa, Raukawa, and Te Arawa River Iwi Waikato River Act 2010, and with additional responsibilities arising under the Nga Wai o Maniapoto (Wa...

7. [2024] NZEmpC 62 Guerra v Wilson-Grange Investments Ltd T/A The Grange Bar and Restaurant [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...at [3]. 4 See Fletcher Development and Construction Ltd v NZ Labourers etc IUOW [1988] NZILR 114 (LC) at 120; and Nathan v Broadspectrum (New Zealand) Ltd [2017] NZEmpC 72. 5 Employment Relations Act 2000, s 139(3). its full name was requested. There is no detriment to the defendant in making that correction and its name is amended accordingly to Wilson-Grange Investments Ltd. The second issue was that the claim for interest was abandoned. [8] In considering a potentia...

8. [2024] NZEmpC 155 Supercity Ltd v Huch [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...costs.1 [2] Mr Sharp, Supercity Towing’s advocate, has endeavoured to engage with Mr Huch regarding costs. However, Mr Elwell, counsel who represented Mr Huch before the Court, has advised that he has received no response from Mr Huch to his request for instructions in the matter. Supercity Towing has taken the step of serving Mr Huch personally with the memorandum setting out its application for costs. Mr Huch has not filed anything with the Court. 1 Supercity Towing Ltd...

9. [2025] NZEmpC 83 Labour Inspector v Dao (Judgment (No 3) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...owned by the H&K Family Trust and not the respondents themselves. [10] Mr Denyer, counsel for the Labour Inspector, agrees that freezing orders should not freeze more assets than are necessary, but he submits that there is insufficient information to date in relation to the extent of the assets – in particular, the ownership of the three properties. He has not yet had an opportunity to consider the affidavits provided by the respondents. [11] The certificates of title for t...

10. 2025 NZPSPLA 063.pdf [pdf, 86 KB]

    ...authority, and breached professional standards. [2] TPD deny these allegations and say Ms Murray mischaracterises a legitimate investigation into theft with an employment investigation. They also say Ms Murray does not have all the relevant information and has failed to provide evidence to establish any grounds for misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct. They therefore say that leave for Ms Murray to file her complaint should not be granted. [3] Section 74(2) of the Act states that...