Search Results

1. [2020] NZEmpC 129 ANZ Sky Tours Ltd T/A ANZ Sky Tours v Wei [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...interlocutory applications by ANZ Sky Tours against Ms Wei. One such issue related to disclosure of documents held on a file of an immigration consultant employed by Ms Wei to assist with and resolve her immigration status. Another issue related to a request for Ms Wei to disclose documents relating to any attempt she had made to obtain employment with another employer. This request included documents relating to attempts made, both prior to and after the date of termination of M...

2. Henare v Maori Trustee - Parengarenga 3G costs [2012] Māori Appellate Court MB 540 (2012 APPEAL 540) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...discretion; b) The Court should look to what is just in the circumstances and in doing so should have regard to the nature and course of the proceedings; the importance of the issues; the conduct of the parties; and whether the proceedings were informal or akin to civil litigation; c) If a party has acted unreasonably – for instance by pursuing a wholly unmeritorious and hopeless claim or defence – a more liberal award may well be made in the discretion of the Judge, but there...

3. [2021] NZACC 30 - Knox v ACC (5 February 2021) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...with a deemed accident date of 24 December 2015 (the date when Mr Knox presented to Dunedin Hospital for treatment for the septic arthritis). [4] Mr Knox sought weekly compensation from 25 December 2015 for 42 days, as recorded in the injury claim form dated 18 January 2016. [5] The Corporation investigated whether Mr Knox was entitled to weekly compensation. [6] On 19 January 2016, MPI replied to the Corporation’s questions as to Mr Knox’s work patterns, stating that:...

4. Brown - Motatau 2 Section 23A1B [2019] Chief Judge's MB 311 (2019 CJ 311) [pdf, 339 KB]

   ...subsequent Orders affecting lands to which this application relates 17. There are no consequential orders affecting Motatau 2 Section 23A1B Block. Details of payments made as a result of the Order 18. A Beneficiary Rent Search to Te Tumu Paeroa was not requested because there has been no previous or existing Māori Trustee involvement with this block. Reference to areas of difficulty 19. There are no areas of difficulty to deal with in this matter. Consideration of whether ma...

5. Security Information in Proceedings Bill [PDF, 1.1 MB]

   ...6490402_1 Level 3 Justice Centre 19 Aitken Street PO Box 2858 DX SP20208 Wellington 6140 New Zealand Ph: +64 4 472 1719 Fax: +64 4 473 3482 www.crownlaw.govt.nz 30 September 2021 Attorney-General Security Information in Proceedings Legislation Bill [PCO22599/11.8] – Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 Our Ref: ATT395/333 1. We have considered the Security Information in Proceedings Legislation Bill in draft (version 11.8...

6. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 1 v H [2013] NZLCDT 7 (18 March 2013) [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...to Complainant’s best interests (on or before 31 July 2008) 20 The facts, matters and particulars set out in paragraphs 1 to 16 above are repeated. 21 From 2004 onwards, the Practitioner did not adequately advise the Complainant on: (a) The claims the Complainant may have had against the Vendor in relation to his failure to obtain a code compliance certificate. (b) The time limits which would apply to any such claims. 22 From 2005 onwards, the Practitioner did not adequately adv...

7. Karauti – Succession to George or Hori Kiwa Tukuai (2000) 116 Otorohanga MB 81 (116 OT 81) [pdf, 777 KB]

   ...Minute Book 1 12/62-63 and members of the Tukua family turned up at Court to dispute Kahuhui David Karauti's claim to succeed to Maketu C2B in the terms of the Will. The Court then adjourned the application so that the parties could prepare for a formal hearing on the legal aspects which had been raised. Further hearings were held on 10 July 1998 (recorded at Otorohanga Minute Book 1131145-159) and 16 February 1999 (recorded at Otorohanga Minute Otarohanga Minute Book Volume 116...

8. LCRO 178-2016 KO v RT [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...and imposed a censure and a costs order. [2] Mr RT, an accountant, was the liquidator of The [X] Limited (In Liquidation) (the company) which he states was placed into liquidation on June 2010. He complained that Mr KO failed to respond to his requests to provide information about the company. [3] He says that he “regularly under[took] replacement liquidator appointments when asked to do so by the Commissioner of Inland Revenue” (the Commissioner). The Commissioner suspected...

9. LCRO 40/2023 DG v [Area] Standards Committee [X] (13 March 2024) [pdf, 497 KB]

   ...different from the financial position of the Partner and Trust B. [9] At some point between 2014 and 2016, the complainant introduced the applicant to the Partner. In 2016, the Partner’s father and co-trustee of Trust B died. At the Partner’s request, the applicant accepted appointment as independent trustee in his place. [10] There is disagreement between the complainant and the applicant as to the complainant’s role in that appointment. The firm said initially that: …...

10. [2012] NZEmpC 109 Shelby Park Ltd v Blackie [pdf, 186 KB]

    ...without authority, a fact he admitted to Mr Skinner. This allegedly occurred in September and the two litres taken were worth between $200-$300, according to Mr Skinner’s evidence. [54] Mr Skinner gave no evidence that this was a matter that had formed the basis of any disciplinary action he took against Mr Blackie. It is not even recorded in the work diary. [55] Mr Blackie’s evidence was that he did not admit to stealing the two litres of Roundup. His evidence was that...