Search Results

1. LCRO 130/2022 FN v EO (31 October 2023) [pdf, 261 KB]

   ...view to obtaining the company’s bank statements in an effort to trace Mr ZQ’s funds. [18] Ms EO says that she received no updates from Mr FN and only became aware in March 2021 that he had left the firm.3 [19] As a result of Ms EO’s request for information in April 2021, Mr FN sent a report4 addressed to [Company B Ltd]. He advised that the statutory demand had been served on 1 April 2019, but he had then become aware that the company had been placed into liquidation by...

2. [2009] NZEmpC CC 7/09 Heritage Expeditions Ltd v Fraser [pdf, 37 KB]

   ...Heritage Expeditions Limited rather than Heritage Travel Group Limited. On behalf of Mr Fraser, his solicitors asked the Authority to substitute Heritage Expeditions Limited as the respondent in the proceedings. [10] In response to that request, the Authority reopened its investigation and scheduled a further investigation meeting on 4 June 2009. Notice of that meeting and a minute issued by the Authority was sent to Heritage Travel Group Limited at its address for servi...

3. Cutaran-Tanggaan v Earnshaw [2012] NZIACDT 61 (28 September 2012) [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...done so. [13] Ms Cutaran-Tanggaan produced emails evidencing promises by Ms Earnshaw to refund fees, which included the following emails from Ms Earnshaw to Ms Cutaran-Tanggaan: [13.1] 14 July 2009 — Ms Earnshaw said she had “put forward your request for a refund less of course the charges. At the moment, refunds are still suspended ...”. 3 [13.2] 22 August 2009 — Ms Earnshaw said “... you will be the first to be refunded”. [13.3] 29 August 2009 — Ms Earnsh...

4. ST v CBU LCRO 125 / 2011 (10 December 2012) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...directors of the company and it is not necessary that they should express their complaints as being lodged in that capacity for the complaint to be accepted. [27] It would also be something of an anomaly if it were necessary for there to be a formal company resolution to pursue a complaint, as in circumstances where there was disagreement between directors, a complaint could not be pursued. This is a factor which a Standards Committee would no doubt take into account, but I do not th...

5. [2019] NZEmpC 24 Blue Water Hotel Ltd v VBS [pdf, 370 KB]

   ...terms of s 45(5) of the LSA. [33] Mr Govender is correct in stating that the Court has a discretion under the subsection: P v Attorney-General;12 and of course that is also the position under cl 19 of sch 3 of the Act.13 [34] At the request of the Court, counsel were asked for submissions as to whether this proceeding should be regarded as a test case, it being well established that in such an instance, costs may lie where they fall. [35] Mr McBride referred to a legal co...

6. [2021] NZEmpC 29 Gestro v Relph [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...authored by Mr Relph in the period 2 to 5 March 2021. [13] Mr Relph said that the emails were sent in an attempt to negotiate the issues between the parties, as had been suggested by the Court. He said they are marked without prejudice and formed part of a settlement process. [14] Mr McKenzie-Bridle summarised the emails. In respect of each, he submitted: a) The first email is dated 2 March 2021. It was sent by Mr Relph to a third party; Mr McKenzie-Bridle was simply copied...

7. [2022] NZACC 126– Su v ACC (30 June 2022) [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...Estate of Su v Accident Compensation Corporation [2022] NZACC 30. 2 [3] On 10 March 2019, Mr Su was admitted to hospital. The hospital notes on his admission record that malignancy was regarded as the most likely aetiology, and he was informed of this. Over the next few days, Mr Su’s lungs were drained and this made a significant difference to Mr Su’s ability to breath without discomfort. Blood samples were taken for analysis, and Mr Su was advised that tuberculosis was a...

8. [2025] NZEmpC 105 AZK Ltd v JKL [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...with all the papers filed, so they will be fully appraised of the allegations and the basis for them. For those reasons, this judgment refers to the evidence only to the extent necessary for the purposes of the judgment. [17] The respondent is a former employee of the applicant. Earlier this year, the applicant noted discrepancies in invoices the respondent had supplied for customer 3 “Employment Court of New Zealand Practice Directions” (1 September 2024) <www.employm...

9. [2023] NZIACDT 26 - BL v Registrar (10 October 2023) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...February 2023. On 27 January 2023, the appellant sought reconsideration by Immigration NZ of the decline of the student visa. Appellant contacts adviser [5] The appellant first contacted the adviser by text on 1 February 2023 (at 10:26 am) requesting assistance with her immigration status as no decision had been made on a reconsideration application, but her interim visa would expire on 8 February 2023. On the same day (at 11:21 am), the adviser sent an email to the appellant as...

10. [2006] NZEmpC CC 7/06 NZ Meatworkers Union Inc v Alliance Group Ltd [pdf, 156 KB]

    ...workers store their work clothing and boots in their lockers during the off season and in some cases also their knives and steels. [10] When they confirm that they will be returning for a new season, workers are required to sign an application form which states that they wish to be considered for employment in the next processing season and concludes: I acknowledge and accept that if I am offered employment in the ________ processing season my employment will be on such terms and...