Search Results

1. Satnam Singh v Shane Singh and Scorpion Liquor [2015] NZHRRT 8 [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...414 (Kós J, SL Ineson and PJ Davies) at [107] and [108]. On the facts we see nothing to justify the withholding from the plaintiff of a formal declaration that Shane Singh and Scorpion Liquor breached s 63 of the HRA. [55] We now address the request by the plaintiff that a restraining order be made. Restraining order [56] We believe the request for a restraining order under s 92I(3)(b) of the HRA is properly made. It is clear from the evidence given by the plaintiff that racial ha...

2. Waitangi Tribunal - Part III Te Urewera [pdf, 6.7 MB]

   ...rectified, and footnotes checked and corrected where necessary . Photographs and additional illustrative material may be inserted, and some maps may be modified, added, or replaced . The Tribunal is releasing a pre-publication version of its report at the request of the Crown and claimants in Te Urewera in order to assist them in their negotiations . The remainder of the pre-publication report will be released in further parts . Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded fr...

3. [2019] NZSSAA 05 (31 January 2019) [pdf, 529 KB]

   ...adopted an intransigent strategy of not only withholding support, but electing not to provide the dignity of face-to-face communication with XXXX. The level of intransigence has been established by its refusal to engage face to face with XXXX when requested to do so by this Authority. Of course, the Ministry has had to engage with him face to face at hearings in a courtroom. XXXX is not the most problematic person the Ministry is required to deal with, people who have a history of...

4. OIA-111168.pdf [pdf, 771 KB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 3 May 2024 Ref: OIA 111168 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request Thank you for your request under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act) on 29 February 2024, to the Ministry of Health for information about policies related to Te Tiriti o Waitangi. On 5 April 2024 the Ministry of Health transferred the following part of...

5. [2011] NZEmpC 17 Clarke v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...coming on to the plant and were stopping vehicles entering its premises and searching them with trained dogs. What happened with Mr Clarke has always been in dispute and so must be determined as a matter of evidence. [3] The company’s case, which formed the basis of its finding of serious misconduct and Mr Clarke’s dismissal, is that he refused to heed clear signals to stop and intimidated and endangered the safety of a supervisor engaged in the drug search exercise, Yvonne Llo...

6. [2011] NZEmpC 78 NZ Tramways and Public Passenger Transport Employees Union & Ors v Wellington City Transport Ltd [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...considered that the proceedings concerned only the stated parties and there was no identifiable public interest and urgency. 5 [19] In this Court, Ms Kennedy submitted that potentially over 45 other employees covered by the CEA may bring similar claims against the respondent and that the respondent‟s liability to those employees may be substantial. Counsel submitted that given its potential liability, the respondent was likely to challenge any adverse determination by the Auth...

7. [2009] NZEmpC AC 6A/09 Bay Milk Distributors Ltd v Jopson [pdf, 41 KB]

   ...[17] In the event of a redundancy which, I find as a matter of interpretation, included the circumstances facing Mr Jopson, clause 21.7 of the employment agreement required BMDL to discuss possible redeployment, if any existed, to assist him, if requested, in obtaining alternative employment and to “provide counselling if necessary to assist the Employee.” Clause 21.8 also provided that there would be no entitlement to damages or compensation in the event of a redundancy. Discu...

8. Bigham v Budd - Waiokura Marae and Reserves Trust (2014) 331 Aotea MB 151 (331 AOT 151) [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...three vacancies on the trust. The obvious solution would be for the Court to agree to the appointment of three of the nominees from the last meeting. In this context I find the arguments of Ms Budd less compelling. While it is correct that she requested an adjournment of the meeting due to a tangi, it would appear that the majority of the beneficiaries who attended the hui, including close whānau of the deceased, confirmed that they wanted the meeting to proceed. [22] While it...

9. Samuelu v Aasa [2014] NZIACDT 67 (30 May 2014) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...unsatisfactory after making inquiries. [2.5] Immigration New Zealand informed the adviser of the difficulty with the job offer and she failed to respond in a satisfactory manner. She provided no substantive response to Immigration New Zealand’s requests. [2.6] She failed to inform the complainant of what had happened, he had to make his own inquires with Immigration New Zealand. [3] The essence of the complaint is the adviser took fees, lodged an application that was not satisfactor...

10. Deputy Registrar - Estate of Hohepa Ripia [2016] Chief Judge's MB 869 (2016 CJ 869) [pdf, 273 KB]

    ...or the Registrar. The Chief Judge may also make such other orders as, in the opinion of the Chief Judge, is necessary in the interests of justice to remedy the mistake or omission. 2016 Chief Judge’s MB 878 [9] The applicant has requested that the Chief Judge amend the order that is the subject of this application. In terms of Tau v Nga Whānau O Morven & Glenavy – Waihao 903 Section IX block5 and Ashwell – Rawinia or Lavinia Ashwell (nee Russell)6 the burden...